Literature DB >> 3928804

An analysis of in vitro T cell responsiveness in lepromatous leprosy.

G Kaplan, D E Weinstein, R M Steinman, W R Levis, U Elvers, M E Patarroyo, Z A Cohn.   

Abstract

In lepromatous leprosy, there is extensive replication of Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) within dermal macrophages. This lack of microbial resistance has been attributed to a defective cell-mediated immune response to M. leprae antigens. We have examined the in vitro response of T cells to M. leprae to determine if hyporesponsiveness could be reversed. The study included 40 unselected patients from New York and from Colombia, most with the severe lepromatous form of the disease. We first noted that lepromatous leprosy patients were of two types: those unable to respond, as assessed by T cell proliferation and immune (gamma) interferon (IFN-gamma) release, and a second group, exhibiting low but detectable responses relative to tuberculoid controls. When the effect of exogenous recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) on the response to M. leprae antigens was compared in the two groups, many of the low responders, but not the nonresponders, showed enhanced proliferation and IFN-gamma release. To evaluate a possible suppressive effect of monocytes, these cells were eliminated with a cell-specific monoclonal antibody and complement. Depletion of monocytes often expanded preexisting weak responses but did not reverse the anergy of the M. leprae nonresponders. The enhancement was not M. leprae-specific, since it was also observed when bacillus Calmette-Guerin was the antigenic stimulus for proliferation and IFN-gamma production. Removal of the suppressor T cell subset, with OKT8 antibody and complement, also did not restore responses in nonresponder patients. We conclude that a sizable number of lepromatous leprosy patients exhibit a low degree of responsiveness to M. leprae and that the responses can be enhanced in vitro with IL-2 or with monocyte depletion. Nonresponsiveness, however, cannot be reversed. Since currently available assays measure the function of previously sensitized T cells, suppressor mechanisms may yet contribute to defective cell-mediated immunity by impairing the initial sensitization to M. leprae antigens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3928804      PMCID: PMC2187803          DOI: 10.1084/jem.162.3.917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  30 in total

1.  Activated suppressor T cells in leprosy.

Authors:  V Mehra; J Convit; A Rubinstein; B R Bloom
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  A monoclonal antibody (BA-1) reactive with cells of human B lymphocyte lineage.

Authors:  C S Abramson; J H Kersey; T W LeBien
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  T-cell conditioned media reverse T-cell unresponsiveness in lepromatous leprosy.

Authors:  A Haregewoin; T Godal; A S Mustafa; A Belehu; T Yemaneberhan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Studies on the defect in cell-mediated immunity in lepromatous leprosy using HLA-D-identical siblings. Absence of circulating suppressor cells and evidence that the defect is in the T-lymphocyte, rather than the monocyte, population.

Authors:  G L Stoner; R N Mshana; J Touw; A Belehu
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Mechanism of immunosuppression in leprosy: presence of suppressor factor(s) from macrophages of lepromatous patients.

Authors:  P R Salgame; P R Mahadevan; N H Antia
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  In vitro stimulation of lymphocytes in leprosy patients, healthy contacts of leprosy patients, and subjects not exposed to leprosy. Comparison of an antigen fraction prepared from Mycobacterium leprae and tuberculin-purified protein derivative.

Authors:  O Closs; L J Reitan; K Negassi; M Harboe; A Belehu
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  T cell subsets in leprosy lesions: in situ characterization using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  R B Narayanan; L K Bhutani; A K Sharma; I Nath
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Alterations in the membrane of macrophages from leprosy patients.

Authors:  T J Birdi; N F Mistry; P R Mahadevan; N H Antia
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  The cutaneous infiltrates of leprosy: cellular characteristics and the predominant T-cell phenotypes.

Authors:  W C Van Voorhis; G Kaplan; E N Sarno; M A Horwitz; R M Steinman; W R Levis; N Nogueira; L S Hair; C R Gattass; B A Arrick; Z A Cohn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Natural suppressor cells in human leprosy: the role of HLA-D-identical peripheral lymphocytes and macrophages in the in vitro modulation of lymphoproliferative responses.

Authors:  I Nath; J J Van Rood; N K Mehra; M C Vaidya
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  31 in total

1.  Presence of human T-cell responses to the Mycobacterium leprae 45-kilodalton antigen reflects infection with or exposure to M. leprae.

Authors:  A Macfarlane; R Mondragon-Gonzalez; F Vega-Lopez; B Wieles; J de Pena; O Rodriguez; R Suarez y de la Torre; R R de Vries; T H Ottenhoff; H M Dockrell
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2001-05

2.  Common polymorphisms in the NOD2 gene region are associated with leprosy and its reactive states.

Authors:  William Richard Berrington; Murdo Macdonald; Saraswoti Khadge; Bishwa Raj Sapkota; Marta Janer; Deanna Alisa Hagge; Gilla Kaplan; Thomas Richard Hawn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Mycobacterium leprae-host-cell interactions and genetic determinants in leprosy: an overview.

Authors:  Roberta Olmo Pinheiro; Jorgenilce de Souza Salles; Euzenir Nunes Sarno; Elizabeth Pereira Sampaio
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 4.  Immunological study of the defined constituents of mycobacteria.

Authors:  J Ivanyi; K Sharp; P Jackett; G Bothamley
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  1988

5.  Prevalence and specificity of the enhancing effect of three types of interleukin 2 on T cell responsiveness in 97 lepromatous leprosy patients of mixed ethnic origin.

Authors:  S Barnass; J Mace; J Steele; P Torres; B Gervasoni; R Ravioli; J Terencio; G A Rook; M F Waters
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Limiting dilution analysis of T cell unresponsiveness to mycobacteria in advanced disseminated tuberculosis.

Authors:  M S Gilardini Montani; F Del Gallo; G Lombardi; P Del Porto; E Piccolella; F Arienzo; V Colizzi
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Defective intralesional interferon-gamma activity in patients with lepromatous leprosy.

Authors:  B Volc-Platzer; H Stemberger; T Luger; T Radaszkiewicz; G Wiedermann
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Influence of delayed immune reactions on human epidermal keratinocytes.

Authors:  G Kaplan; M D Witmer; I Nath; R M Steinman; S Laal; H K Prasad; E N Sarno; U Elvers; Z A Cohn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Influence of Mycobacterium leprae and its soluble products on the cutaneous responsiveness of leprosy patients to antigen and recombinant interleukin 2.

Authors:  G Kaplan; E P Sampaio; G P Walsh; R A Burkhardt; T T Fajardo; L S Guido; A de Miranda Machado; R V Cellona; R M Abalos; E N Sarno
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Parasite-specific anergy in human filariasis. Insights after analysis of parasite antigen-driven lymphokine production.

Authors:  T B Nutman; V Kumaraswami; E A Ottesen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.