Literature DB >> 25218239

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation: no value in short-term duplex ultrasound follow-up.

M Broe1, F M Shaikh, A Leahy.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endogenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a proven treatment for varicose veins that has equal efficacy to surgical stripping. It offers the benefit of reduced post operative pain and wound infection and quicker return to work. AIM: To carry out a clinical audit of patients undergoing RFA to monitor outcomes, complication rates, follow-up sclerotherapy and to assess the need for post-operative duplex scan.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 174 procedures carried out from January 2011 to March 2012. Patients were pre-assessed with history, physical exam and duplex ultrasound. They were followed up at 3 months with same. CEAP classification was applied to check for post-operative improvement.
RESULTS: 174 procedures, including 165 great saphenous vein and 9 short saphenous vein ablations were carried out on 154 patients. The duplex occlusion rate at 3 months was 99 %. 141 patients (81 %) showed a reduction in CEAP score with average CEAP decreasing from 2.37 to 0.96. Overall the complication rate was low at 7 %. Paraesthesia was the most common complication with 7 cases (4 %). There were no DVTs. 45.4 % of patients went on to have follow-up sclerotherapy for venous flares.
CONCLUSION: RFA is a safe and effective treatment for varicose veins. There is no benefit in performing routine short term follow-up duplex scan due to the high occlusion rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25218239     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-014-1194-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  26 in total

1.  Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year.

Authors:  Denis Creton; Olivier Pichot; Carmine Sessa; T M Proebstle
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  Regarding "Deep vein thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution".

Authors:  Mitchel P Goldman; Robert Weiss; Wayne Gradman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Endovenous radiofrequency ablation of superficial and perforator veins.

Authors:  Steven M Roth
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Randomized clinical trial of VNUS ClosureFAST radiofrequency ablation versus laser for varicose veins.

Authors:  A C Shepherd; M S Gohel; L C Brown; M J Metcalfe; M Hamish; A H Davies
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Great saphenous vein patency and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous thermal ablation with modified catheter tip positioning.

Authors:  Omar P Haqqani; Calin Vasiliu; Thomas F O'Donnell; Mark D Iafrati
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities.

Authors:  Thomas M Proebstle; Jens Alm; Oliver Göckeritz; Christian Wenzel; Thomas Noppeney; Christian Lebard; Olivier Pichot; Carmine Sessa; Denis Creton
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: a potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques.

Authors:  Geza Mozes; Manju Kalra; Michele Carmo; Lori Swenson; Peter Gloviczki
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution.

Authors:  Anil P Hingorani; Enrico Ascher; Natalia Markevich; Richard W Schutzer; Sreedhar Kallakuri; Alexander Hou; Suresh Nahata; William Yorkovich; Theresa Jacob
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation or conventional high ligation and stripping for great saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  S Subramonia; T Lees
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The occlusion rate and patterns of saphenous vein after radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Choi; Ho-Chul Park; Jin Hyun Joh
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.