Literature DB >> 20116207

Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration carried out with the ClosureFast procedure: results at 1 year.

Denis Creton1, Olivier Pichot, Carmine Sessa, T M Proebstle.   

Abstract

This prospective and multicenter study shows the results at 1 year of radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal obliteration (RSTO) carried out with the ClosureFast procedure. The RSTO clinical and duplex ultrasound imaging results were evaluated at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. All procedures were carried out on outpatients under tumescent local anesthesia. Among the 295 members who were treated, 289 were reexamined at 3 days, 290 at 3 months, 289 at 6 months, and 220 at 1 year. Occlusion scores were 99.7%, 99.3%, 98.6%, and 96.9% at, respectively, 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. At 3 cm below the saphenofemoral junction, before the procedure, the greater saphenous vein (GSV) diameter was 5.4+/-2 mm (range 2-18). It decreased to 4.5+/-1.7 mm at 3 days, 2.4+/-1.5 mm at 6 months, and 1.3+/-0.9 mm at 1 year. In members reexamined at 1 year, the decrease in diameter of the treated vein compared with the preprocedural measurement was 79% (p<0.001, t-test). At 1 year, in 58% of the cases, duplex ultrasound imaging at mid-thigh level could not show the GSV trunk. Preprocedural pain that was present in 57.5% of the cases decreased to 10.8% of the cases at 3 days and 2% of the cases at 1 year (p<0.001, chi2 test). Among the treated limbs, 70.1% did not present with any postprocedural pain at any time of the follow-up. On the third day, the patients evaluated the mean pain intensity at 0.7+/-1.6 on a visual analog scale of 0-10. During the follow-up, no painful indurations were noticed in 67.7% of the legs. No thromboembolic complications were reported. Paresthesias were observed in 3.4% of the cases. Invalidity clinical score, evaluated at 3.9+/-2 before the procedure, decreased to 3.5+/-1.2 on the third day, 0.9+/-1.5 at 3 months, 0.7+/-1.2 at 6 months, and 0.5+/-1.1 at 1 year. This study confirms the efficacy of RSTO when using ClosureFast, which allows obliteration of the GSV trunk in 97% of cases at 1 year with few side effects and almost no postprocedural pain. Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20116207     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  14 in total

1.  [Endovenous ablation of saphenous vein varicosis].

Authors:  Sanja Schuller-Petrovic
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-06-13

Review 2.  [Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins : The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations].

Authors:  Karsten Hartmann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2011-02-01

4.  Endovenous radiofrequency ablation: no value in short-term duplex ultrasound follow-up.

Authors:  M Broe; F M Shaikh; A Leahy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Is radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins a valuable option? A systematic review of the literature with a cost analysis.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Jean-François Fisette; Suzanne K Bédard; Marc-Antoine Despatis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Five-year results from the prospective European multicentre cohort study on radiofrequency segmental thermal ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins.

Authors:  T M Proebstle; B J Alm; O Göckeritz; C Wenzel; T Noppeney; C Lebard; C Sessa; D Creton; O Pichot
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Mechanochemical endovenous ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein insufficiency (MESSI trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Doeke Boersma; Ramon R J P van Eekeren; Hans J C Kelder; Debora A B Werson; Suzanne Holewijn; Michiel A Schreve; Michel M P J Reijnen; Jean Paul P M de Vries
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Current standards and recent progress in minimally invasive phlebo surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Göckeritz
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2012-04

Review 9.  Consensus for the Treatment of Varicose Vein with Radiofrequency Ablation.

Authors:  Jin Hyun Joh; Woo-Shik Kim; In Mok Jung; Ki-Hyuk Park; Taeseung Lee; Jin Mo Kang
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2014-12-31

10.  Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation versus RADiOfrequeNcy Ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ramon R J P van Eekeren; Doeke Boersma; Suzanne Holewijn; Anco Vahl; Jean Paul p m de Vries; Clark J Zeebregts; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.