BACKGROUND: The ingestion of a high-fat diet (HFD) and the resulting obese state can exert a multitude of stressors on the individual including anxiety and cognitive dysfunction. Though many studies have shown that exercise can alleviate the negative consequences of a HFD using metabolic readouts such as insulin and glucose, a paucity of well-controlled rodent studies have been published on HFD and exercise interactions with regard to behavioral outcomes. This is a critical issue since some individuals assume that HFD-induced behavioral problems such as anxiety and cognitive dysfunction can simply be exercised away. To investigate this, we analyzed mice fed a normal diet (ND), ND with exercise, HFD diet, or HFD with exercise. RESULTS: We found that mice on a HFD had robust anxiety phenotypes but this was not rescued by exercise. Conversely, exercise increased cognitive abilities but this was not impacted by the HFD. Given the importance of the gut microbiome in shaping the host state, we used 16S rRNA hypervariable tag sequencing to profile our cohorts and found that HFD massively reshaped the gut microbial community in agreement with numerous published studies. However, exercise alone also caused massive shifts in the gut microbiome at nearly the same magnitude as diet but these changes were surprisingly orthogonal. Additionally, specific bacterial abundances were directly proportional to measures of anxiety or cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, behavioral domains and the gut microbiome are both impacted by diet and exercise but in unrelated ways. These data have important implications for obesity research aimed at modifications of the gut microbiome and suggest that specific gut microbes could be used as a biomarker for anxiety or cognition or perhaps even targeted for therapy.
BACKGROUND: The ingestion of a high-fat diet (HFD) and the resulting obese state can exert a multitude of stressors on the individual including anxiety and cognitive dysfunction. Though many studies have shown that exercise can alleviate the negative consequences of a HFD using metabolic readouts such as insulin and glucose, a paucity of well-controlled rodent studies have been published on HFD and exercise interactions with regard to behavioral outcomes. This is a critical issue since some individuals assume that HFD-induced behavioral problems such as anxiety and cognitive dysfunction can simply be exercised away. To investigate this, we analyzed mice fed a normal diet (ND), ND with exercise, HFD diet, or HFD with exercise. RESULTS: We found that mice on a HFD had robust anxiety phenotypes but this was not rescued by exercise. Conversely, exercise increased cognitive abilities but this was not impacted by the HFD. Given the importance of the gut microbiome in shaping the host state, we used 16S rRNA hypervariable tag sequencing to profile our cohorts and found that HFD massively reshaped the gut microbial community in agreement with numerous published studies. However, exercise alone also caused massive shifts in the gut microbiome at nearly the same magnitude as diet but these changes were surprisingly orthogonal. Additionally, specific bacterial abundances were directly proportional to measures of anxiety or cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, behavioral domains and the gut microbiome are both impacted by diet and exercise but in unrelated ways. These data have important implications for obesity research aimed at modifications of the gut microbiome and suggest that specific gut microbes could be used as a biomarker for anxiety or cognition or perhaps even targeted for therapy.
Authors: Rochellys Diaz Heijtz; Shugui Wang; Farhana Anuar; Yu Qian; Britta Björkholm; Annika Samuelsson; Martin L Hibberd; Hans Forssberg; Sven Pettersson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicole de Wit; Muriel Derrien; Hanneke Bosch-Vermeulen; Els Oosterink; Shohreh Keshtkar; Caroline Duval; Johan de Vogel-van den Bosch; Michiel Kleerebezem; Michael Müller; Roelof van der Meer Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Javier A Bravo; Paul Forsythe; Marianne V Chew; Emily Escaravage; Hélène M Savignac; Timothy G Dinan; John Bienenstock; John F Cryan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight Journal: ISME J Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Marc Lohse; Anthony M Bolger; Axel Nagel; Alisdair R Fernie; John E Lunn; Mark Stitt; Björn Usadel Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: David Arndt; Jianguo Xia; Yifeng Liu; You Zhou; An Chi Guo; Joseph A Cruz; Igor Sinelnikov; Karen Budwill; Camilla L Nesbø; David S Wishart Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: L Langsetmo; A Johnson; R T Demmer; N Fino; E S Orwoll; K E Ensrud; A R Hoffman; J A Cauley; A Shmagel; K Meyer; J M Shikany Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Gabrielle L Davidson; Amy C Cooke; Crystal N Johnson; John L Quinn Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Jesseca A Paulsen; Travis S Ptacek; Stephen J Carter; Nianjun Liu; Ranjit Kumar; LaKeshia Hyndman; Elliot J Lefkowitz; Casey D Morrow; Laura Q Rogers Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Natasha A Koloski; Michael Jones; Marjorie M Walker; Gerald Holtmann; Nicholas J Talley Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Simon J Evans; Christine M Bassis; Robert Hein; Shervin Assari; Stephanie A Flowers; Marisa B Kelly; Vince B Young; Vicky E Ellingrod; Melvin G McInnis Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-12-10 Impact factor: 4.791