Literature DB >> 25217772

TERT promoter mutation status as an independent prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma.

Klaus G Griewank1, Rajmohan Murali2, Joan Anton Puig-Butille2, Bastian Schilling2, Elisabeth Livingstone2, Miriam Potrony2, Cristina Carrera2, Tobias Schimming2, Inga Möller2, Marion Schwamborn2, Antje Sucker2, Uwe Hillen2, Celia Badenas2, Josep Malvehy2, Lisa Zimmer2, André Scherag2, Susana Puig2, Dirk Schadendorf1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, TERT promoter mutations were identified at high frequencies in cutaneous melanoma tumor samples and cell lines. The mutations were found to have a UV-signature and to lead to increased TERT gene expression. We analyzed a large cohort of melanoma patients for the presence and distribution of TERT promoter mutations and their association with clinico-pathological characteristics.
METHODS: 410 melanoma tumor samples were analyzed by Sanger sequencing for the presence of TERT promoter mutations. An analysis of associations between mutation status and various clinical and pathologic variables was performed.
RESULTS: TERT promoter mutations were identified in 154 (43%) of 362 successfully sequenced melanomas. Mutation frequencies varied between melanoma subtype, being most frequent in melanomas arising in nonacral skin (48%) and melanomas with occult primary (50%), and less frequent in mucosal (23%), and acral (19%) melanomas. Mutations carried a UV signature (C>T or CC>TT). The presence of TERT promoter mutations was associated with factors such as BRAF or NRAS mutation (P < .001), histologic type (P = .002), and Breslow thickness (P < .001). TERT promoter mutation was independently associated with poorer overall survival in patients with nonacral cutaneous melanomas (median survival 80 months vs 291 months for wild-type; hazard ratio corrected for other covariates 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29 to 4.74; P = .006).
CONCLUSIONS: UV-induced TERT promoter mutations are one of the most frequent genetic alterations in melanoma, with frequencies varying depending on melanoma subtype. In nonacral cutaneous melanomas, presence of TERT promoter mutations is independently associated with poor prognosis.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25217772      PMCID: PMC4200061          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  32 in total

1.  NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Roland L Bassett; Chaan S Ng; Jonathan L Curry; Richard W Joseph; Gladys C Alvarado; Michelle L Rohlfs; Jessie Richard; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Kevin B Kim; Alexander J Lazar; Patrick Hwu; Michael A Davies
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma.

Authors:  John A Curtin; Jane Fridlyand; Toshiro Kageshita; Hetal N Patel; Klaus J Busam; Heinz Kutzner; Kwang-Hyun Cho; Setsuya Aiba; Eva-Bettina Bröcker; Philip E LeBoit; Dan Pinkel; Boris C Bastian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  The role of telomeres in stem cells and cancer.

Authors:  Cagatay Günes; K Lenhard Rudolph
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  BRAF mutation, NRAS mutation, and the absence of an immune-related expressed gene profile predict poor outcome in patients with stage III melanoma.

Authors:  Graham J Mann; Gulietta M Pupo; Anna E Campain; Candace D Carter; Sarah-Jane Schramm; Svetlana Pianova; Sebastien K Gerega; Chitra De Silva; Kenneth Lai; James S Wilmott; Maria Synnott; Peter Hersey; Richard F Kefford; John F Thompson; Yee Hwa Yang; Richard A Scolyer
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 8.551

5.  Gene amplifications characterize acral melanoma and permit the detection of occult tumor cells in the surrounding skin.

Authors:  B C Bastian; M Kashani-Sabet; H Hamm; T Godfrey; D H Moore; E B Bröcker; P E LeBoit; D Pinkel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome.

Authors:  Erin D Pleasance; R Keira Cheetham; Philip J Stephens; David J McBride; Sean J Humphray; Chris D Greenman; Ignacio Varela; Meng-Lay Lin; Gonzalo R Ordóñez; Graham R Bignell; Kai Ye; Julie Alipaz; Markus J Bauer; David Beare; Adam Butler; Richard J Carter; Lina Chen; Anthony J Cox; Sarah Edkins; Paula I Kokko-Gonzales; Niall A Gormley; Russell J Grocock; Christian D Haudenschild; Matthew M Hims; Terena James; Mingming Jia; Zoya Kingsbury; Catherine Leroy; John Marshall; Andrew Menzies; Laura J Mudie; Zemin Ning; Tom Royce; Ole B Schulz-Trieglaff; Anastassia Spiridou; Lucy A Stebbings; Lukasz Szajkowski; Jon Teague; David Williamson; Lynda Chin; Mark T Ross; Peter J Campbell; David R Bentley; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetic alterations in RAS-regulated pathway in acral lentiginous melanoma.

Authors:  Joan A Puig-Butillé; Celia Badenas; Zighereda Ogbah; Cristina Carrera; Paula Aguilera; Josep Malvehy; Susana Puig
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.960

8.  Mutations of the TERT promoter are common in basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Glynis A Scott; Todd S Laughlin; Paul G Rothberg
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  TERT promoter mutations are frequent in cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Klaus G Griewank; Rajmohan Murali; Bastian Schilling; Tobias Schimming; Inga Möller; Iris Moll; Marion Schwamborn; Antje Sucker; Lisa Zimmer; Dirk Schadendorf; Uwe Hillen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  90 in total

1.  Utility of TERT Promoter Mutations for Cutaneous Primary Melanoma Diagnosis.

Authors:  Nancy E Thomas; Sharon N Edmiston; Yihsuan S Tsai; Joel S Parker; Paul B Googe; Klaus J Busam; Glynis A Scott; Daniel C Zedek; Eloise A Parrish; Honglin Hao; Nathaniel A Slater; Michelle V Pearlstein; Jill S Frank; Pei Fen Kuan; David W Ollila; Kathleen Conway
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 2.  Genetic-guided Risk Assessment and Management of Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Association of TERT promoter mutation 1,295,228 C>T with BRAF V600E mutation, older patient age, and distant metastasis in anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Shi; Rengyun Liu; Shen Qu; Guangwu Zhu; Justin Bishop; Xiaoli Liu; Hui Sun; Zhongyan Shan; Enhua Wang; Yahong Luo; Xianghong Yang; Jiajun Zhao; Jianling Du; Adel K El-Naggar; Weiping Teng; Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Efficacy of Cabozantinib and Nivolumab in Treating Hepatocellular Carcinoma with RET Amplification, High Tumor Mutational Burden, and PD-L1 Expression.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yang; Junping Shi; Xiaoqian Chen; Yan Jiang; Haitao Zhao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-02-26

5.  A primary melanoma and its asynchronous metastasis highlight the role of BRAF, CDKN2A, and TERT.

Authors:  Gregory A Hosler; Teresa Davoli; Ilgen Mender; Brandon Litzner; Jaehyuk Choi; Payal Kapur; Jerry W Shay; Richard C Wang
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 6.  Roles of UVA radiation and DNA damage responses in melanoma pathogenesis.

Authors:  Aiman Q Khan; Jeffrey B Travers; Michael G Kemp
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  TERT promoter mutations and prognosis in solitary fibrous tumor.

Authors:  Armita Bahrami; Seungjae Lee; Inga-Marie Schaefer; Jennifer M Boland; Kurt T Patton; Stanley Pounds; Christopher D Fletcher
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  POT1 germline mutations but not TERT promoter mutations are implicated in melanoma susceptibility in a large cohort of Spanish melanoma families.

Authors:  M Potrony; J A Puig-Butille; M Ribera-Sola; V Iyer; C D Robles-Espinoza; P Aguilera; C Carrera; J Malvehy; C Badenas; M T Landi; D J Adams; S Puig
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  TERT Genetic Mutations as Prognostic Marker in Glioma.

Authors:  Peiliang Geng; Xiaoxin Zhao; Juanjuan Ou; Jianjun Li; Rina Sa; Houjie Liang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 10.  TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Rengyun Liu; Mingzhao Xing
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.678

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.