Literature DB >> 25217699

Responsiveness of human neonates to the odor of 5α-androst-16-en-3-one: a behavioral paradox?

Helene M Loos1, Sébastien Doucet2, Robert Soussignan3, Constanze Hartmann4, Karine Durand3, Ralf Dittrich5, Paul Sagot6, Andrea Buettner7, Benoist Schaal3.   

Abstract

The odorous steroid 5α-androst-16-en-3-one (AND) occurs in numerous biological fluids in mammals, including man, where it is believed to play a chemocommunicative role. As AND was recently detected in milk and amniotic fluid, sensitivity and hedonic responses to this substance were assessed in human neonates. To this aim, respiration and facial expressions were recorded in 3-day-old newborns in response to aqueous solutions of AND, ranging from 500ng/mL to 0.5 fg/mL. Although analyses of respiratory rate did not lead to clear-cut results, the newborns changed their facial expressions at concentrations not detected by adults in a triangle test. Newborns displayed negative facial actions of longer duration to AND relative to an odorless control. Thus, AND may be considered to be offensive to newborns, which is a counterintuitive outcome as they are exposed to this compound in the womb (and it should therefore be familiar), in milk, and on the mother's skin surface (and it should therefore be conditioned as positive). Multiple reasons for this perceptual-behavioral paradox are discussed.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amniotic fluid; androstenone; aversion; milk; olfaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25217699     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bju041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  8 in total

1.  Responses of Human Neonates to Highly Diluted Odorants from Sweat.

Authors:  Helene M Loos; Sébastien Doucet; Fanny Védrines; Constanze Sharapa; Robert Soussignan; Karine Durand; Paul Sagot; Andrea Buettner; Benoist Schaal
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth.

Authors:  John P McGann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Global Survey of Variation in a Human Olfactory Receptor Gene Reveals Signatures of Non-Neutral Evolution.

Authors:  Kara C Hoover; Omer Gokcumen; Zoya Qureshy; Elise Bruguera; Aulaphan Savangsuksa; Matthew Cobb; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 4.  The development of motor behavior.

Authors:  Karen E Adolph; John M Franchak
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 5.  Olfaction scaffolds the developing human from neonate to adolescent and beyond.

Authors:  Benoist Schaal; Tamsin K Saxton; Hélène Loos; Robert Soussignan; Karine Durand
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Cinema audiences reproducibly vary the chemical composition of air during films, by broadcasting scene specific emissions on breath.

Authors:  Jonathan Williams; Christof Stönner; Jörg Wicker; Nicolas Krauter; Bettina Derstroff; Efstratios Bourtsoukidis; Thomas Klüpfel; Stefan Kramer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Characterization of off-odours and potentially harmful substances in a fancy dress accessory handbag for children.

Authors:  Christoph Wiedmer; Cristina Velasco-Schön; Andrea Buettner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  More Data, Please: Machine Learning to Advance the Multidisciplinary Science of Human Sociochemistry.

Authors:  Jasper H B de Groot; Ilja Croijmans; Monique A M Smeets
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.