Literature DB >> 25217520

Mathematical modeling of tumor growth and metastatic spreading: validation in tumor-bearing mice.

Niklas Hartung1, Séverine Mollard2, Dominique Barbolosi2, Assia Benabdallah1, Guillemette Chapuisat1, Gerard Henry1, Sarah Giacometti2, Athanassios Iliadis2, Joseph Ciccolini2, Christian Faivre2, Florence Hubert3.   

Abstract

Defining tumor stage at diagnosis is a pivotal point for clinical decisions about patient treatment strategies. In this respect, early detection of occult metastasis invisible to current imaging methods would have a major impact on best care and long-term survival. Mathematical models that describe metastatic spreading might estimate the risk of metastasis when no clinical evidence is available. In this study, we adapted a top-down model to make such estimates. The model was constituted by a transport equation describing metastatic growth and endowed with a boundary condition for metastatic emission. Model predictions were compared with experimental results from orthotopic breast tumor xenograft experiments conducted in Nod/Scidγ mice. Primary tumor growth, metastatic spread and growth were monitored by 3D bioluminescence tomography. A tailored computational approach allowed the use of Monolix software for mixed-effects modeling with a partial differential equation model. Primary tumor growth was described best by Bertalanffy, West, and Gompertz models, which involve an initial exponential growth phase. All other tested models were rejected. The best metastatic model involved two parameters describing metastatic spreading and growth, respectively. Visual predictive check, analysis of residuals, and a bootstrap study validated the model. Coefficients of determination were [Formula: see text] for primary tumor growth and [Formula: see text] for metastatic growth. The data-based model development revealed several biologically significant findings. First, information on both growth and spreading can be obtained from measures of total metastatic burden. Second, the postulated link between primary tumor size and emission rate is validated. Finally, fast growing peritoneal metastases can only be described by such a complex partial differential equation model and not by ordinary differential equation models. This work advances efforts to predict metastatic spreading during the earliest stages of cancer. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25217520     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  28 in total

1.  A Prediction Model of Tumor Progression and Survival in HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Dongwoo Chae; Chung Mo Nam; Joo Hoon Kim; Choong-Kun Lee; Seung-Seob Kim; Hyo Song Kim; Minkyu Jung; Jae Ho Cheong; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha; Kyungsoo Park
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Modeling Spontaneous Metastasis following Surgery: An In Vivo-In Silico Approach.

Authors:  Sebastien Benzekry; Amanda Tracz; Michalis Mastri; Ryan Corbelli; Dominique Barbolosi; John M L Ebos
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Experimental method and statistical analysis to fit tumor growth model using SPECT/CT imaging: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Ivan Hidrovo; Joyoni Dey; Megan E Chesal; Dmytro Shumilov; Narayan Bhusal; J Michael Mathis
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-06

4.  Three-Dimensional Spatiotemporal Modeling of Colon Cancer Organoids Reveals that Multimodal Control of Stem Cell Self-Renewal is a Critical Determinant of Size and Shape in Early Stages of Tumor Growth.

Authors:  Huaming Yan; Anna Konstorum; John S Lowengrub
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Multiscale Modeling of Glioblastoma Suggests that the Partial Disruption of Vessel/Cancer Stem Cell Crosstalk Can Promote Tumor Regression Without Increasing Invasiveness.

Authors:  Huaming Yan; Monica Romero-Lopez; Hermann B Frieboes; Christopher C W Hughes; John S Lowengrub
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

Review 7.  Computational oncology--mathematical modelling of drug regimens for precision medicine.

Authors:  Dominique Barbolosi; Joseph Ciccolini; Bruno Lacarelle; Fabrice Barlési; Nicolas André
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  A Model-Based Personalized Cancer Screening Strategy for Detecting Early-Stage Tumors Using Blood-Borne Biomarkers.

Authors:  Sharon Seiko Hori; Amelie M Lutz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Rotating magnetic field induced oscillation of magnetic particles for in vivo mechanical destruction of malignant glioma.

Authors:  Yu Cheng; Megan E Muroski; Dorothée C M C Petit; Rhodri Mansell; Tarun Vemulkar; Ramin A Morshed; Yu Han; Irina V Balyasnikova; Craig M Horbinski; Xinlei Huang; Lingjiao Zhang; Russell P Cowburn; Maciej S Lesniak
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Comparative Analysis of the Growth Pattern of Thyroid Cancer in Young Patients Screened by Ultrasonography in Japan After a Nuclear Accident: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Sanae Midorikawa; Akira Ohtsuru; Michio Murakami; Hideto Takahashi; Satoru Suzuki; Takashi Matsuzuka; Hiroki Shimura; Tetsuya Ohira; Shin-Ichi Suzuki; Seiji Yasumura; Shunichi Yamashita; Hitoshi Ohto; Koichi Tanigawa; Kenji Kamiya
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.