Ho Jong Ra1, Jeong Ku Ha2, Ho Su Jang2, Jin Goo Kim3. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Gangneung, Korea. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, 85, Jeo-dong 2Ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, 85, Jeo-dong 2Ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, Korea. boram107@hanmail.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the incidence and diagnostic rate of traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear associated with severe medial instability and to evaluate the effectiveness of pullout repair. METHODS: From 2007 to 2011, 51 patients who underwent operation due to multiple ligament injuries including medial collateral ligament rupture were reviewed retrospectively. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and Lysholm score were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, and if indicated, a second-look arthroscopic examination was conducted. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 51 patients were associated with severe medial instability. Seven patients were diagnosed with traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear and underwent arthroscopic pullout repair. Five of them were missed at initial diagnosis using MRI. In seven patients, the mean Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores improved from 74.6 ± 10.3 and 47.6 ± 7.3 to 93.0 ± 3.7 and 91.6 ± 2.6, respectively. All showed complete healing of meniscus root on follow-up MRI and second-look arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Medial meniscus posterior root tear may occur in severe medial instability from trauma. It is a common mistake that surgeons may not notice on the diagnosis of those injuries using MRI. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required for the diagnosis of medial meniscus posterior root tear in this type of injuries. The traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear could be healed successfully using arthroscopic pullout repair technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The possibility of the medial meniscus posterior root tear should be considered in severe medial instability and arthroscopic pullout repair can be an effective option for treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.
PURPOSE: To examine the incidence and diagnostic rate of traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear associated with severe medial instability and to evaluate the effectiveness of pullout repair. METHODS: From 2007 to 2011, 51 patients who underwent operation due to multiple ligament injuries including medial collateral ligament rupture were reviewed retrospectively. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and Lysholm score were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, and if indicated, a second-look arthroscopic examination was conducted. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 51 patients were associated with severe medial instability. Seven patients were diagnosed with traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear and underwent arthroscopic pullout repair. Five of them were missed at initial diagnosis using MRI. In seven patients, the mean Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores improved from 74.6 ± 10.3 and 47.6 ± 7.3 to 93.0 ± 3.7 and 91.6 ± 2.6, respectively. All showed complete healing of meniscus root on follow-up MRI and second-look arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Medial meniscus posterior root tear may occur in severe medial instability from trauma. It is a common mistake that surgeons may not notice on the diagnosis of those injuries using MRI. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required for the diagnosis of medial meniscus posterior root tear in this type of injuries. The traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear could be healed successfully using arthroscopic pullout repair technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The possibility of the medial meniscus posterior root tear should be considered in severe medial instability and arthroscopic pullout repair can be an effective option for treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.
Authors: Sang Bum Kim; Jeong Ku Ha; Soo Won Lee; Deok Won Kim; Jae Chan Shim; Jin Goo Kim; Mi Young Lee Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Jin Goo Kim; Yong Seuk Lee; Tae Soo Bae; Jeong Ku Ha; Dong Hoon Lee; Young Jae Kim; Ho Jong Ra Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Aaron J Krych; Nick R Johnson; Rohith Mohan; Diane L Dahm; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jonathan D Kosy; Luigi Matteliano; Anshul Rastogi; Dawn Pearce; Daniel B Whelan Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Daniel J Kaplan; Erin F Alaia; Andrew P Dold; Robert J Meislin; Eric J Strauss; Laith M Jazrawi; Michael J Alaia Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Aaron J Krych; Patrick J Reardon; Nick R Johnson; Rohith Mohan; Logan Peter; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.342