Yoon-Ho Kwak1, Sahnghoon Lee1, Myung Chul Lee1, Hyuk-Soo Han2. 1. Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. 2. Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea. oshawks7@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find a prognostic factor of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) for surgical decision making. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients who were diagnosed as acute or subacute MMPRT without severe degeneration of the meniscus were treated conservatively for 3 months. Fifty-seven patients with MMPRT showed good response to conservative treatment (group 1), while the remaining 31 patients who failed to conservative treatment (group 2) received arthroscopic meniscus repair. Their demographic characteristics and radiographic features including hip-knee-ankle angle, joint line convergence angle, Kellgren-Lawrence grade in plain radiographs, meniscus extrusion (ME) ratio (ME-medial femoral condyle ratio, ME-medial tibial plateau ratio, ME-meniscus width ratio), the location of bony edema, and cartilage lesions in MRI were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was also performed to determine the cut-off values of risk factors. RESULTS: The degree of ME-medial femoral condyle and medial tibia plateau ratio of group 2 was significantly higher than group 1 (0.08 and 0.07 vs. 0.1 and 0.09, respectively, both p < 0.001). No significant (n.s.) difference in other variables was found between the two groups. On ROC curve analysis, ME-medial femoral condyle ratio was confirmed as the most reliable prognostic factor of conservative treatment for MMPRT (area under ROC = 0.8). CONCLUSION: The large meniscus extrusion ratio was the most reliable poor prognostic factor of conservative treatment for MMPRT. Therefore, for MMPRT patients with large meniscus extrusion, early surgical repair could be considered as the primary treatment option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to find a prognostic factor of medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) for surgical decision making. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients who were diagnosed as acute or subacute MMPRT without severe degeneration of the meniscus were treated conservatively for 3 months. Fifty-seven patients with MMPRT showed good response to conservative treatment (group 1), while the remaining 31 patients who failed to conservative treatment (group 2) received arthroscopic meniscus repair. Their demographic characteristics and radiographic features including hip-knee-ankle angle, joint line convergence angle, Kellgren-Lawrence grade in plain radiographs, meniscus extrusion (ME) ratio (ME-medial femoral condyle ratio, ME-medial tibial plateau ratio, ME-meniscus width ratio), the location of bony edema, and cartilage lesions in MRI were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was also performed to determine the cut-off values of risk factors. RESULTS: The degree of ME-medial femoral condyle and medial tibia plateau ratio of group 2 was significantly higher than group 1 (0.08 and 0.07 vs. 0.1 and 0.09, respectively, both p < 0.001). No significant (n.s.) difference in other variables was found between the two groups. On ROC curve analysis, ME-medial femoral condyle ratio was confirmed as the most reliable prognostic factor of conservative treatment for MMPRT (area under ROC = 0.8). CONCLUSION: The large meniscus extrusion ratio was the most reliable poor prognostic factor of conservative treatment for MMPRT. Therefore, for MMPRT patients with large meniscus extrusion, early surgical repair could be considered as the primary treatment option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Guillaume D Dumont; Grant D Hogue; Jeffrey R Padalecki; Ngozi Okoro; Philip L Wilson Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Wolf Petersen; Philipp Forkel; Matthias J Feucht; Thore Zantop; Andreas B Imhoff; Peter U Brucker Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: James R Slauterbeck; Petteri Kousa; Blake C Clifton; Shelly Naud; Timothy W Tourville; Robert J Johnson; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Dustin R Lee; Anna K Reinholz; Sara E Till; Yining Lu; Christopher L Camp; Thomas M DeBerardino; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2022-04-27
Authors: Aaron J Krych; Matthew D LaPrade; Mario Hevesi; Nicholas G Rhodes; Adam C Johnson; Christopher L Camp; Michael J Stuart Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-11-04