Literature DB >> 25216949

Pulse pressure variation is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure.

Jae-Kwang Shim1, Jong-Wook Song1, Young Song1, Ji-Ho Kim2, Hye-Min Kang3, Young-Lan Kwak4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the predictive ability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) for fluid responsiveness would be altered in patients with elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: According to the preoperative echocardiographic assessment of the ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus (E/E'), patients undergoing surgical coronary revascularization were classified into normal (n=34, E/E'<8) and high (n=34, E/E'>15) LV filling pressure group. After anesthetic induction, PPV and hemodynamic data were measured before and after 6 mL/kg of colloid administration. Fluid responsiveness was defined as 12% or more increase in stroke volume index assessed by pulmonary artery catheter and tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
RESULTS: The AUROCs of PPV in the normal and high filling pressure group were 0.829 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.661-0.963; P<.001) and 0.583 (95% CI, 0.402-0.749; P=.110), respectively. The AUROCs of cardiac filling pressures and right ventricular end-diastolic volume index did not show statistical significance in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: None of the assessed preload indices including PPV were able to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated LV filling pressure.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Filling pressure; Fluid responsiveness; Left ventricle; Pulse pressure variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25216949     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  9 in total

1.  The Evaluation of Factors Affecting Hemodynamic Variability in Mechanically-Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Eissa Bilehjani; Nader Nader; Haleh Farzin; Maryam Haghighate Azari; Solmaz Fakhari
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-08-12

2.  Sudden cardiac arrest in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with dynamic cavity obstruction: The case for a decatecholaminisation strategy.

Authors:  Cosmin Balan; Adrian View-Kim Wong
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2017-10-09

3.  Combination of Static Echocardiographic Indices for the Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Coronary Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hye-Bin Kim; Sarah Soh; Jong-Wook Song; Min-Yu Kim; Young-Lan Kwak; Jae-Kwang Shim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  [Detection rate of thyroid nodules in routine health check-up and its influencing factors: a 10-year survey of 309 576 cases].

Authors:  Xiaoying Lai; Ping Ouyang; Hong Zhu; Shengli An; Lijuan Xia; Yiting Yao; Han Zhang; Zhi Li; Kan Deng
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-02-29

5.  Pulse Wave Transit Time Measurements of Cardiac Output in Septic Shock Patients: A Comparison of the Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output System with Transthoracic Echocardiography.

Authors:  Marc Feissel; Ludwig Serge Aho; Stefan Georgiev; Romain Tapponnier; Julio Badie; Rémi Bruyère; Jean-Pierre Quenot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miguel Á Ibarra-Estrada; José A López-Pulgarín; Julio C Mijangos-Méndez; José L Díaz-Gómez; Guadalupe Aguirre-Avalos
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2015-06-26

7.  Applicability of Pulse Pressure Variation during Unstable Hemodynamic Events in the Intensive Care Unit: A Five-Day Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Bertrand Delannoy; Florent Wallet; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Mathieu Page; Mahmoud Kaaki; Mathieu Schoeffler; Brenton Alexander; Olivier Desebbe
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 8.  Fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2015-11-19

9.  Ten Things to be Considered in Practicing Critical Care Echocardiography.

Authors:  Xin Ding; Da-Wei Liu; Yan-Gong Cao; Hong-Min Zhang; Huan Chen; Hua Zhao; Xiao-Ting Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.