Literature DB >> 25216649

Inter-subject variability of LTD-like plasticity in human motor cortex: a matter of preceding motor activation.

Mitchell R Goldsworthy1, Florian Müller-Dahlhaus2, Michael C Ridding3, Ulf Ziemann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) of the human primary motor cortex (M1) induces long-term depression (LTD)-like plastic changes in corticospinal excitability, but several studies have reported high inter-subject variability of this effect. Most studies use a tonic voluntary contraction of the target muscle before cTBS to set stimulation intensity; however, it is unclear how this might affect response variability.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of pre-activation of the target hand muscle on inter-subject response variability to cTBS of the human M1.
METHODS: The response to cTBS was assessed by changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. For Study 1, ten healthy subjects attended two sessions. They were instructed in one session to keep their FDI relaxed for the entire testing period (pre-relax), and in the other to perform a 2-min 10% of maximal voluntary tonic contraction 15 min before cTBS (pre-active). For Study 2, data from our previous study were re-analyzed to extend the pre-relax condition to an additional 26 subjects (total n = 36).
RESULTS: cTBS-induced highly consistent LTD-like MEP depression in the pre-relax condition, but not in the pre-active condition. Inter-subject response variability increased in the pre-active condition.
CONCLUSIONS: cTBS induces consistent LTD-like plasticity with low inter-subject variability if pre-activation of the stimulated motor cortex is avoided. This affirms a translational potential of cTBS in clinical applications that aim at reducing cortical excitability.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long-term depression; Metaplasticity; Theta burst stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Voluntary contraction; rTMS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25216649     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  28 in total

1.  Inter-individual variability in cortical excitability and motor network connectivity following multiple blocks of rTMS.

Authors:  Charlotte Nettekoven; Lukas J Volz; Martha Leimbach; Eva-Maria Pool; Anne K Rehme; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Lindsay M Oberman; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 8.294

3.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Polymorphism Predicts Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Shreya Parchure; Denise Y Harvey; Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Laura DeLoretta; Rachel Wurzman; Daniela Sacchetti; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Falk W Lohoff; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-12

4.  Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration'.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Bereznicki; Gillian M Clark; George J Youssef; Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Charlotte B Davies; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Julie Stamm; Sung Wook Chung; Steven J Bowe; Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald; Giacomo Koch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Continuous theta burst stimulation increases contralateral mu and beta rhythms with arm elevation: implications for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Ana Dionísio; Rita Gouveia; Isabel Catarina Duarte; João Castelhano; Felix Duecker; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Motor network connectivity predicts neuroplastic response following theta burst stimulation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Brenton Hordacre; Mitchell R Goldsworthy; Lynton Graetz; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  Reversed Effects of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation following Motor Training That Vary as a Function of Training-Induced Changes in Corticospinal Excitability.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Jeffery J Summers; Mark R Hinder
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Polymorphism Predicts Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Shreya Parchure; Denise Y Harvey; Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Laura DeLoretta; Rachel Wurzman; Daniela Sacchetti; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Falk W Lohoff; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  Variability in cTBS Aftereffects Attributed to the Interaction of Stimulus Intensity With BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism.

Authors:  Denise Y Harvey; Laura DeLoretta; Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Rachel Wurzman; Daniela Sacchetti; Ahmed Ahmed; Abdou Thiam; Falk W Lohoff; Olufunsho Faseyitan; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Modulation of motor cortical excitability by continuous theta-burst stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Mary A Ryan; Gabrielle Block; Fae B Kayarian; Lindsay M Oberman; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.