Literature DB >> 2521570

Prognostic variables in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Importance of medical assessment of liver involvement.

N Kemeny1, D Niedzwiecki, B Shurgot, P Oderman.   

Abstract

Variation in response rates to chemotherapy and survival in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma may be due to patient selection factors. The prognostic importance of 13 factors were analyzed in 112 patients with only hepatic metastases, who were eligible for hepatic artery infusional chemotherapy. When individually analyzed, six factors were found to significantly (less than 0.001) affect survival: the percentage of tumor involvement of the liver, assessed medically or surgically; initial serum albumin and lactic dehydrogenase; initial Karnofsky performance status; and weight loss. Patients with less than or equal to 30% liver involvement had a median survival of 24 months versus 10 months if they had greater than 30% involvement. There was a highly significant agreement between medical and surgical assessment of liver involvement (P = 0.0001). When the variables affecting survival were studied together by multivariable analyses, the most important factor was the medical assessment of liver involvement accomplished by evaluation of radionuclide liver scan and CTT scans. The next two most important factors in the model were the ability of the patient to obtain a tumor response and the presence or absence of weight loss. Only one factor helped predict response to chemotherapy, the type of perfusion seen on a 99Technetium-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) arterial flow scan. Forty-five percent of patients with good perfusion had a partial response while 13% of patients with poor perfusion had a tumor response (P = 0.006). We recommend that future studies, dealing with patients who have hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma and are eligible for hepatic arterial infusion, document and stratify for the following factors: the percentage of liver involvement, the presence or absence of weight loss, and the type of perfusion seen on MAA scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2521570     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890215)63:4<742::aid-cncr2820630423>3.0.co;2-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

Review 1.  Progress in the development of prognostic and predictive markers for gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Crystal S Denlinger; Steven J Cohen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2007-10

2.  Screening older cancer patients for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: A comparison of three instruments.

Authors:  Cynthia Owusu; Siran M Koroukian; Mark Schluchter; Paul Bakaki; Nathan A Berger
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Combining systemic chemotherapy with chemoembolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yau-Tong You; Chung-Rong Changchien; Jen-Seng Huang; Koon-Kwan Ng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Prognostic value of chemotherapy-induced hematological toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Laurie Rambach; Aurelie Bertaut; Julie Vincent; Veronique Lorgis; Sylvain Ladoire; Francois Ghiringhelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Nutrition support can bring survival benefit to high nutrition risk gastric cancer patients who received chemotherapy.

Authors:  Miaozhen Qiu; Yi-xin Zhou; Yin Jin; Zi-xian Wang; Xiao-li Wei; Hong-yu Han; Wen-feng Ye; Zhi-wei Zhou; Dong-sheng Zhang; Feng-hua Wang; Yu-hong Li; Da-jun Yang; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Primary and metastatic liver lesions of clinical colorectal cancer differ in chemosensitivity.

Authors:  Y Maehara; Y Sakaguchi; Y Emi; T Kusumoto; S Kohnoe; M Mori; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Clinicopathological features and outcome in advanced colorectal cancer patients with synchronous vs metachronous metastases.

Authors:  L J M Mekenkamp; M Koopman; S Teerenstra; J H J M van Krieken; L Mol; I D Nagtegaal; C J A Punt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  [Transarterial chemoembolization of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma using degradable starch microspheres (Spherex): personal investigations and review of the literature].

Authors:  K Wasser; F Giebel; R Fischbach; H Tesch; P Landwehr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT): a new modality for treating patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  R S Stubbs; S K Wickremesekera
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Prognostic and predictive role of lactate dehydrogenase 5 expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with PTK787/ZK 222584 (vatalanib) antiangiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Michael I Koukourakis; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Efthimios Sivridis; Kevin C Gatter; Tanja Trarbach; Gunnar Folprecht; Michael M Shi; David Lebwohl; Tarja Jalava; Dirk Laurent; Gerold Meinhardt; Adrian L Harris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.