| Literature DB >> 25214872 |
Yong Li1, YiXin Ying1, WanLong Ding1.
Abstract
The bacterial communities of 1- to 6-year ginseng rhizosphere soils were characterized by culture-independent approaches, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). Culture-dependent method (Biolog) was used to investigate the metabolic function variance of microbe living in rhizosphere soil. Results showed that significant genetic and metabolic function variance were detected among soils, and, with the increasing of cultivating years, genetic diversity of bacterial communities in ginseng rhizosphere soil tended to be decreased. Also we found that Verrucomicrobia, Acidobacteria, and Proteobacteria were the dominants in rhizosphere soils, but, with the increasing of cultivating years, plant disease prevention or plant growth promoting bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, and Bacillus, tended to be rare.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25214872 PMCID: PMC4156984 DOI: 10.1155/2014/160373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Bacterial diversity and metabolic function indices of ginseng rhizosphere soils.
| Soil samples | Cultivating year |
|
| Shannon diversity | Evenness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | 0.4782 | 0.6712 | 2.791 | 0.829 |
| B | 2 | 0.4357 | 0.6273 | 2.786 | 0.827 |
| C | 3 | 0.4880 | 0.6811 | 2.768 | 0.838 |
| D | 4 | 0.3519 | 0.5367 | 2.716 | 0.832 |
| E | 5 | 0.3866 | 0.5750 | 2.778 | 0.822 |
| F | 6 | 0.4142 | 0.6047 | 2.664 | 0.818 |
H′ indicates Nei's gene diversity; I indicates Shannon's information index.
Figure 1UPGMA dendrogram of six ginseng rhizosphere soils.
Figure 2Rarefaction curves for bacterial OTUs, clustering at 97% rRNA gene similarity.
Figure 3Bacterial communities in ginseng rhizosphere soil.
Figure 4Average well color development (AWCD) with incubation.
Figure 5Principal component analysis (PCA) of Biolog EcoPlates data. Each solid triangle represents a soil sample.
Substrates highly correlated with PC1 and PC2.
| PC1 |
|
|---|---|
| Carbohydrates | |
| I-Erythritol | 0.895 |
| Glycogen | 0.835 |
| D-Glucosaminic acid | 0.859 |
| D-Cellobiose | 0.891 |
| Amino acids | |
| L-Arginine | 0.848 |
| L-Phenylalanine | 0.918 |
| L-Threonine | 0.838 |
|
| |
| Pyruvic acid methyl ester | 0.873 |
| y-Hydroxybutyric | 0.930 |
| Itaconic acid | 0.959 |
| a-Ketobutyric acid | 0.907 |
| Amines | |
| Putrescine | 0.968 |
| Phenolic | |
| 2-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 0.802 |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 0.905 |
| Polymer | |
| a-Cyclodextrin | 0.886 |
|
| |
| PC2 |
|
|
| |
| Amino acids | |
| L-Asparagine | 0.805 |
| Carbohydrates | |
| N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine | 0.804 |