Benjamin M Scirica1, Luiz Belardinelli2, Bernard R Chaitman3, Jonathan W Waks4, Samuel Volo4, Ewa Karwatowska-Prokopczuk2, Sabina A Murphy4, Mei L Cheng2, Eugene Braunwald4, David A Morrow4. 1. TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA bscirica@partners.org. 2. Gilead Science, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA. 3. St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. 4. TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: To determine the effect of ranolazine, an anti-ischaemic agent with anti-arrhythmic properties, on the overall burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and determine whether ranolazine reduces the long-term incidence of clinical AF after ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: MERLIN-TIMI 36 randomized patients with non-ST elevation ACS to ranolazine or placebo. Atrial fibrillation episodes detected on continuous electrocardiogram (cECG) monitoring were reviewed in 6351 patients (97% of trial). Atrial fibrillation burden was categorized according to the time in AF: clinically insignificant AF (<0.01% of time), paroxysmal AF (>0.01-98%), or predominantly persistent AF (>98%). Clinical AF events were identified through adverse event reporting for a median 1-year follow-up. Overall, patients assigned to ranolazine had a trend towards fewer episodes of AF [75 (2.4%) vs. 55 (1.7%) patients, P = 0.08] detected on cECG during the first 7 days after randomization. The pattern of new-onset AF differed between ranolazine vs. placebo: clinically insignificant AF (five patients in ranolazine vs. seven in placebo), paroxysmal AF (18 vs. 48 patients), and predominantly chronic AF (28 vs. 20 patients, three-way P < 0.01). Among patients with a paroxysmal AF pattern, the overall burden was lower with ranolazine than with placebo (median 4.4 vs.16.1%, P = 0.015). Over the median 1-year follow-up, fewer patients treated with ranolazine experienced an AF event compared with placebo (2.9 vs. 4.1%, RR 0.71, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION:Ranolazine, an anti-anginal agent with electrophysiological effects, may reduce the frequency of paroxysmal AF in patients with non-ST elevation ACS with a pattern of lower overall AF burden in this group. Ranolazine reduced the overall 1-year incidence of clinical AF events. These atrial-specific anti-arrhythmic properties of ranolazine may be of clinical interest and warrant additional investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00099788. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To determine the effect of ranolazine, an anti-ischaemic agent with anti-arrhythmic properties, on the overall burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and determine whether ranolazine reduces the long-term incidence of clinical AF after ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS:MERLIN-TIMI 36 randomized patients with non-ST elevation ACS to ranolazine or placebo. Atrial fibrillation episodes detected on continuous electrocardiogram (cECG) monitoring were reviewed in 6351 patients (97% of trial). Atrial fibrillation burden was categorized according to the time in AF: clinically insignificant AF (<0.01% of time), paroxysmal AF (>0.01-98%), or predominantly persistent AF (>98%). Clinical AF events were identified through adverse event reporting for a median 1-year follow-up. Overall, patients assigned to ranolazine had a trend towards fewer episodes of AF [75 (2.4%) vs. 55 (1.7%) patients, P = 0.08] detected on cECG during the first 7 days after randomization. The pattern of new-onset AF differed between ranolazine vs. placebo: clinically insignificant AF (five patients in ranolazine vs. seven in placebo), paroxysmal AF (18 vs. 48 patients), and predominantly chronic AF (28 vs. 20 patients, three-way P < 0.01). Among patients with a paroxysmal AF pattern, the overall burden was lower with ranolazine than with placebo (median 4.4 vs.16.1%, P = 0.015). Over the median 1-year follow-up, fewer patients treated with ranolazine experienced an AF event compared with placebo (2.9 vs. 4.1%, RR 0.71, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION:Ranolazine, an anti-anginal agent with electrophysiological effects, may reduce the frequency of paroxysmal AF in patients with non-ST elevation ACS with a pattern of lower overall AF burden in this group. Ranolazine reduced the overall 1-year incidence of clinical AF events. These atrial-specific anti-arrhythmic properties of ranolazine may be of clinical interest and warrant additional investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00099788. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Drayton A Hammond; Carmen Smotherman; Christopher A Jankowski; Stephen Tan; Omeni Osian; Dale Kraemer; Marci DeLosSantos Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Dorothee Atzler; Christina Baum; Francisco Ojeda; Till Keller; Kathrin Cordts; Renate B Schnabel; Chi-un Choe; Karl J Lackner; Thomas Münzel; Rainer H Böger; Stefan Blankenberg; Edzard Schwedhelm; Tanja Zeller Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 5.501