| Literature DB >> 25209105 |
Kai Nagasawa1, Keiji Takahashi1, Natsumi Matsuura1, Miwa Takatsu1, Takuya Hattori1, Shogo Watanabe1, Eri Harada2, Kazumi Niinuma2, Toyoaki Murohara3, Kohzo Nagata1.
Abstract
Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are often supplemented with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for treatment of hypertension. We recently showed that the L/N-type CCB cilnidipine has superior cardioprotective effects compared with the L-type CCB amlodipine in Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) rats. We have now compared the effects of the ARB valsartan combined with cilnidipine or amlodipine on cardiac pathophysiology in DS rats. DS rats fed a high-salt diet from 6 weeks of age were treated with vehicle, valsartan alone (10 mg kg(-1) per day), or valsartan combined with either cilnidipine (1 mg kg(-1) per day) or amlodipine (1 mg kg(-1) per day) from 7 to 11 weeks. The salt-induced increase in systolic blood pressure apparent in the vehicle group was attenuated similarly in the three drug treatment groups. Valsartan-cilnidipine attenuated left ventricular (LV) fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction as well as cardiac oxidative stress and inflammation to a greater extent than did valsartan alone or valsartan-amlodipine. In addition, the increases in urinary excretion of dopamine and epinephrine as well as in cardiac renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) gene expression apparent in vehicle-treated rats were attenuated to a greater extent by valsartan-cilnidipine than by the other two treatments. Valsartan-cilnidipine thus attenuated LV remodeling and diastolic dysfunction more effectively than did valsartan or valsartan-amlodipine in rats with salt-sensitive hypertension, and this superior cardioprotective action of valsartan-cilnidipine compared with valsartan-amlodipine is likely attributable, at least in part, to the greater antioxidant and antiinflammatory effects associated with both greater inhibition of cardiac RAAS gene expression and N-type calcium channel blockade.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25209105 DOI: 10.1038/hr.2014.136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hypertens Res ISSN: 0916-9636 Impact factor: 3.872