Literature DB >> 15253102

Comparison between cilnidipine and amlodipine besilate with respect to proteinuria in hypertensive patients with renal diseases.

Shunichi Kojima1, Mikio Shida, Hiroyuki Yokoyama.   

Abstract

Unlike other dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine has been reported to exert an N-type calcium-channel-blocking activity and to reduce sympathetic hyperactivity. This study compared cilnidipine and amlodipine with respect to their effects on renal function and proteinuria. Twenty-eight proteinuric hypertensive outpatients (13 men and 15 women, aged 62+/-2 years) who had been maintained on CCBs for more than 3 months were randomly assigned to a group receiving amlodipine besilate (14 patients) or a group receiving cilnidipine (14 patients). CCBs were increased in dosage or other drugs were added until blood pressure decreased below 140/90 mmHg, but no inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin (RA) system were added or changed in dosage. Before and at 6 and 12 months after randomization, the concentrations of urine protein, urine albumin, serum and urine creatinine (Cr), and serum beta2-microglobulin were determined. The amlodipine group showed a significant increase in proteinuria, while the increase was suppressed in the cilnidipine group. The rate of increase in proteinuria at 12 months was 87% (95% confidence interval (CI) -10 to 184) of the baseline value with amlodipine and 4% (95% CI -69 to 77) of baseline with cilnidipine, a significant intergroup difference (p<0.05). The mean blood pressure remained in the 96-99 mmHg range until 12 months after randomization, showing no significant difference between the two groups. The cilnidipine group showed an increase in serum Cr levels (baseline vs. 12 months, 1.36+/-0.20 vs. 1.50+/-0.23 mg/dl, p<0.01). Overall, an inverse correlation existed between the changes in Cr and proteinuria (r= -0.477, p<0.01). These results suggest that cilnidipine results in a greater suppression of the increase in proteinuria and greater reduction in glomerular filtration rate than amlodipine, and that these effects are similar between cilnidipine and RA inhibitors. However, additional large-cohort and longer-term studies will be needed to clarify whether cilnidipine is superior to other CCBs in maintaining renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15253102     DOI: 10.1291/hypres.27.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  21 in total

1.  The N-type and L-type calcium channel blocker cilnidipine suppresses renal injury in Dahl rats fed a high-salt diet.

Authors:  Shizuka Aritomi; Hajime Koganei; Hirotaka Wagatsuma; Akira Mitsui; Tetsuya Ogawa; Kosaku Nitta; Tomoyuki Konda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  The fourth-generation Calcium channel blocker: cilnidipine.

Authors:  K Sarat Chandra; G Ramesh
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-12

3.  An N-/L-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine, suppresses autonomic, electrical, and structural remodelling associated with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kazuko Tajiri; Jean-Baptiste Guichard; Xiaoyan Qi; Feng Xiong; Patrice Naud; Jean-Claude Tardif; Antoine Da Costa; Kazutaka Aonuma; Stanley Nattel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 4.  Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and renal disease.

Authors:  Nicolás R Robles; Francesco Fici; Guido Grassi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  A Comparative Study on Clinical and Biochemical Parameters in Amlodipine and Cilnidipine Treated Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Kiran Shetty; Ranjan Shetty; Lakshminarayana Bairy; Pragna Rao; Amruth Kiran; Manjunath Shetty; Vidya Nayak
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

6.  Additive effects of cilnidipine and angiotensin II receptor blocker in preventing the progression of diabetic nephropathy in diabetic spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Authors:  Shizuka Aritomi; Kazumi Niinuma; Tetsuya Ogawa; Tomoyuki Konda; Kosaku Nitta
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Effect of cilnidipine on normal to marginally elevated urine albumin-creatinine ratio in asymptomatic non-diabetic hypertensive patients: an exponential decay curve analysis.

Authors:  Takaaki Nakatsu; Shinji Toyonaga; Keiichi Mashima; Yoko Yuki; Aya Nishitani; Hiroko Ogawa; Toru Miyoshi; Satoshi Hirohata; Reishi Izumi; Shozo Kusachi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  New Generation Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertensive Treatment.

Authors:  Yuri Ozawa; Koichi Hayashi; Hiroyuki Kobori
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rev       Date:  2006-05-01

9.  Comparative effects of valsartan in combination with cilnidipine or amlodipine on cardiac remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in Dahl salt-sensitive rats.

Authors:  Kai Nagasawa; Keiji Takahashi; Natsumi Matsuura; Miwa Takatsu; Takuya Hattori; Shogo Watanabe; Eri Harada; Kazumi Niinuma; Toyoaki Murohara; Kohzo Nagata
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.872

10.  Comparison of Plasma Levels of Renin, Vasopressin and Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Hypertensive Amlodipine Induced Pedal Oedema, Non-Oedema and Cilnidipine Treated Patients.

Authors:  Kiran Shetty; Ranjan Shetty; Pragna Rao; Mamatha Ballal; Amruth Kiran; Sravan Reddy; Umesh Pai; Jyothi Samanth
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.