Literature DB >> 25207574

Three-dimensional dose prediction based on two-dimensional verification measurements for IMRT.

Iori Sumida1, Hajime Yamaguchi, Hisao Kizaki, Keiko Aboshi, Yuji Yamada, Yasuo Yoshioka, Kazuhiko Ogawa.   

Abstract

Dose verifications for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are generally performed once before treatment. A 39-fraction treatment course for prostate cancer delivers a dose prescription of 78 Gy in eight weeks. Any changes in multileaf collimator leaf position over the treatment course may affect the dosimetry. To evaluate the magnitude of deviations from the predicted dose over an entire treatment course with MLC leaf calibrations performed every two weeks, we tracked weekly changes in relative dose error distributions measured with two-dimensional (2D) beam-by-beam analysis. We compared the dosimetric results from 20 consecutive patient-specific IMRT quality assurance (QA) tests using beam-by-beam analysis and a 2D diode detector array to the dose plans calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS). We added back the resulting relative dose error measured weekly into the original dose grid for each beam. To validate the prediction method, the predicted doses and dose distributions were compared to the measurements using an ionization chamber and film. The predicted doses were in good agreement, within 2% of the measured doses, and the predicted dose distributions also presented good agreement with the measured distributions. Dose verification results measured once as a pretreatment QA test were not completely stable, as results of weekly beam-by-beam analysis showed some variation. Because dosimetric errors throughout the treatment course were averaged, the overall dosimetric impact to patients was small.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25207574      PMCID: PMC5711089          DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Radiation therapy dose escalation for prostate cancer: a rationale for IMRT.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alex Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven Feigenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Robert A Price
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Response corrections for solid-state detectors in megavoltage photon dosimetry.

Authors:  Z Yin; R P Hugtenburg; A H Beddoe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA.

Authors:  Arthur J Olch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  On the insensitivity of single field planar dosimetry to IMRT inaccuracies.

Authors:  Jon J Kruse
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; James M Galvin; Daniel Low; Jatinder R Palta; Isaac Rosen; Michael B Sharpe; Ping Xia; Ying Xiao; Lei Xing; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  3. Special Considerations Regarding Absorbed-Dose and Dose-Volume Prescribing and Reporting in IMRT.

Authors: 
Journal:  J ICRU       Date:  2010-04

7.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors.

Authors:  Benjamin E Nelms; Heming Zhen; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quality assurance of MLC leaf position accuracy and relative dose effect at the MLC abutment region using an electronic portal imaging device.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Hisao Kizaki; Masahiko Koizumi; Toshiyuki Ogata; Yutaka Takahashi; Yasuo Yoshioka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  A survey on planar IMRT QA analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin E Nelms; Jeff A Simon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  6 in total

1.  Incorporation of gantry angle correction for 3D dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Hisao Kizaki; Keiko Aboshi; Mari Tsujii; Yuji Yamada; Masashi Yagi; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Evaluation of the radiobiological gamma index with motion interplay in tangential IMRT breast treatment.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Indra J Das; Hisao Kizaki; Keiko Aboshi; Mari Tsujii; Yuji Yamada; Kiesuke Tamari; Osamu Suzuki; Yuji Seo; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Organ-specific modulation complexity score for the evaluation of dose delivery.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Indra J Das; Hisao Kizaki; Keiko Aboshi; Mari Tsujii; Yuji Yamada; Keisuke Tamari; Yuji Seo; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device.

Authors:  Iori Sumida; Hajime Yamaguchi; Indra J Das; Hisao Kizaki; Keiko Aboshi; Mari Tsujii; Yuji Yamada; Osamu Suzuki; Yuji Seo; Fumiaki Isohashi; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Curtailing patient-specific IMRT QA procedures from 2D dose error distribution.

Authors:  Keita Kurosu; Iori Sumida; Hirokazu Mizuno; Yuki Otani; Michio Oda; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yuji Seo; Osamu Suzuki; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Three-dimensional dose prediction and validation with the radiobiological gamma index based on a relative seriality model for head-and-neck IMRT.

Authors:  Noriaki Hamatani; Iori Sumida; Yutaka Takahashi; Michio Oda; Yuji Seo; Fumiaki Isohashi; Keisuke Tamari; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.