Literature DB >> 25207467

Dual-energy multidetector CT for the characterization of incidental adrenal nodules: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced material density analysis.

Achille Mileto1, Rendon C Nelson, Daniele Marin, Kingshuk Roy Choudhury, Lisa M Ho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether contrast material-enhanced dual-energy multidetector computed tomography (CT) with material decomposition analysis allows differentiation of adrenal adenomas from nonadenomatous lesions and to compare findings with those of nonenhanced multidetector CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board of Duke University, with waiver of informed consent. Thirty-eight nonconsecutive patients (22 men and 16 women; mean age, 65 years) with 47 adrenal nodules underwent nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT of the abdomen. For each adrenal nodule, nonenhanced attenuation values were recorded; dual-energy density measurements were obtained by using fat-iodine and fat-water material density basis pairs. Mean and median values of nonenhanced attenuation and material densities were compared between adenomas and nonadenomas by using the two-sample t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, respectively. The diagnostic performance of nonenhanced multidetector CT and dual-energy material densities was assessed by setting the specificity for diagnosis of adenomas at 100%.
RESULTS: Adenomas (lipid rich and lipid poor) displayed significantly different mean density values (in milligrams per cubic centimeter) than those of nonadenomas on fat-iodine (970.4 ± 17.2 vs 1012.3 ± 9.3), iodine-fat (2.5 ± 0.3 vs 4.5 ± 1.5), fat-water (-666.7 ± 154.8 vs -2141.8 ± 953.2), and water-fat (1628.4 ± 177.3 vs 3225 ± 986.1) images, respectively (P < .0001). For diagnosis of adenomas, dual-energy material density analysis showed a sensitivity of 96% (23 of 24 lesions) at a specificity of 100% (23 of 23 lesions), yielding significantly improved diagnostic performance compared with nonenhanced multidetector CT attenuation (sensitivity of 67% [16 of 24 lesions] at a specificity of 100% [23 of 23 lesions]) (P = .035).
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced dual-energy multidetector CT with material density analysis allows differentiation between adrenal adenomas and nonadenomas, reflecting an improved ability over nonenhanced multidetector CT for diagnosis of lipid-poor adenoma. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25207467     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI?

Authors:  Robert S Lim; Trevor A Flood; Matthew D F McInnes; Luke T Lavallee; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Single- and dual-energy CT of the abdomen: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Andrew D Hardie; U Joseph Schoepf; Lloyd M Felmly; Jonathan D Perry; Akos Varga-Szemes; Stefanie Mangold; Damiano Caruso; Christian Canstein; Thomas J Vogl; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Spectral detector CT for cardiovascular applications.

Authors:  Prabhakar Rajiah; Suhny Abbara; Sandra Simon Halliburton
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 4.  "How to" incorporate dual-energy imaging into a high volume abdominal imaging practice.

Authors:  Eric P Tamm; Ott Le; Xinming Liu; Rick R Layman; Dianna D Cody; Priya R Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-03

5.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT in nonspecific terminal ileitis.

Authors:  Xingyuan Xu; Junting Zhu; Xia Wang; Chao Zhu; Xingwang Wu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  Dual-energy CT in early acute pancreatitis: improved detection using iodine quantification.

Authors:  Simon S Martin; Franziska Trapp; Julian L Wichmann; Moritz H Albrecht; Lukas Lenga; James Durden; Christian Booz; Thomas J Vogl; Tommaso D'Angelo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging the renal lesion with dual-energy multidetector CT and multi-energy applications in clinical practice: what can it truly do for you?

Authors:  Achille Mileto; Keitaro Sofue; Daniele Marin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Iodine quantification and detectability thresholds among major dual-energy CT platforms.

Authors:  Ross Edward Taylor; Pamela Mager; Nam C Yu; David P Katz; Jett R Brady; Nakul Gupta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Dual-Energy Computed Tomography of the Liver: Uses in Clinical Practices and Applications.

Authors:  Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Keitaro Sofue; Masatoshi Hori; Kosuke Sasaki; Kazunari Ishii; Takamichi Murakami; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.