Literature DB >> 25206505

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit for repair of injured sciatic nerve: A mechanical analysis.

Tao Yu1, Changfu Zhao1, Peng Li2, Guangyao Liu1, Min Luo1.   

Abstract

Tensile stress and tensile strain directly affect the quality of nerve regeneration after bridging nerve defects by poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting for sciatic nerve injury. This study collected the sciatic nerve from the gluteus maximus muscle from fresh human cadaver, and established 10-mm-long sciatic nerve injury models by removing the ischium, following which poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits or autogenous nerve grafts were transplanted. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the axon and myelin sheath were torn, and the vessels of basilar membrane were obstructed in the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit-repaired sciatic nerve following tensile testing. There were no significant differences in tensile tests with autogenous nerve graft-repaired sciatic nerve. Following poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation for sciatic nerve repair, tensile test results suggest that maximum tensile load, maximum stress, elastic limit load and elastic limit stress increased compared with autogenous nerve grafts, but elastic limit strain and maximum strain decreased. Moreover, the tendencies of stress-strain curves of sciatic nerves were similar after transplantation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits or autogenous nerve grafts. Results showed that after transplantation in vitro for sciatic nerve injury, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits exhibited good intensity, elasticity and plasticity, indicating that poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits are suitable for sciatic nerve injury repair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  grants-supported paper; injury model; mechanical property; neural regeneration; neuroregeneration; peripheral nerve injury; poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); sciatic nerve; strain; stress; transplantation

Year:  2013        PMID: 25206505      PMCID: PMC4145904          DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.21.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Regen Res        ISSN: 1673-5374            Impact factor:   5.135


Research Highlights After poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting of in vitro models of sciatic nerve injury using human cadaver sciatic nerves, longitudinal tensile tests were conducted, and stress and strain data of sciatic nerves were obtained. This provided biomechanical basis for poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation in the repair of injured sciatic nerve. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits (ratio of lactic acid to glycolic acid = 70:30) were fabricated using NaCl as a pore-foaming agent. The mass ratio of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) to NaCl was 1:9. After transplantation, the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit exhibited a definite intensity, elasticity and plasticity and can be used for sciatic nerve injury transplantation.

INTRODUCTION

The conventional method for repair of peripheral nerve injury is autogenous nerve grafting, but sources of autogenous nerve are limited. Furthermore, neurological deficits in the donor site and painful neuroma can occur following surgery. The use of allogeneic nerve grafts is limited because of host immune rejection. One study investigating preconditioning for allogeneic nerve grafting to remove or reduce its antigenicity is ongoing[1]. In recent years, various absorbable biomaterials have been used in the repair of nerve defects, and achieved a certain degree of repair of a 10-mm-long nerve injury[2]. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), a copolymer of two monomers, lactic acid and glycolic acid, is an extensively used material in the research and application of tissue engineering[345]. A number of studies have addressed the biological properties, biocompatibility and biomechanics of peripheral nerve injury models after transplantation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) material, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits and autogenous nerve grafting[6789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233]. Peng et al [34] performed a one-dimensional tensile test in 10-mm-long sciatic nerve injury models of human cadaver after autogenous nerve and human amnion transplantation for sciatic nerve injury. They found that the tendencies of change in stress-strain curves of human amnion and sciatic nerve were similar, indicating that human amnion has good biological properties and plasticity, making it a superior graft material for peripheral nerve injury. Hou et al[35] found that myelinated nerve fiber density, average diameter of nerve fibers and myelin sheath thickness were similar in regenerating sciatic nerves treated with mesenchymal stem cell transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting at 12 weeks after 10-mm-long sciatic nerve repair with mesenchymal stem cells combined with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits. Schakenraad et al[36] verified that thin conduits had better mechanical support for repairing 10-mm-long sciatic nerve injuries compared to glycine/DL-lactic acid copolymer conduits of various thickness. Hu et al[37] confirmed that human hair keratin can perfectly bridge a 10-mm-long injured sciatic nerve. Li et al[38] verified that after treatment with alcohol, the porosity of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) tubular scaffolds with a diameter of 1 660 ± 218 nm and 80.6% porosity was diminished; its glass transition temperature and thermolysis temperature were elevated; heat stability was enhanced; and breaking strength, blasting strength and suture strength were obviously increased. Zhao et al[39] found that the tensile strength of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds increased with the increased proportion of polylactic acid, indicating that polylactic acid plays an important role in elevating the tensile strength of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) is nontoxic and nonantigenic, has good biodegradability, biocompatibility and mechanical properties, and its degradation speed can be regulated by controlling the content of the ingredients[54041]. Thus, the reproducibility and mechanical properties of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds is high, and poly(lactic-co- glycolic acid) has been extensively used in tissue-engineered materials[54041]. Previous studies mainly focused on the biological properties, biocompatibility and immunology of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) scaffolds. The study examining the biomechanical properties of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) mainly focused on the mechanical properties of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) materials and a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) tubular scaffold. However, no reports have addressed the tensile mechanical properties of injured nerve after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation. The mechanical properties of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits are essential for the bridging of nerve gaps and the quality of nerve regeneration. The present study sought to quantitatively illuminate the mechanical properties of sciatic nerve injury model after poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation, and to explore the feasibility of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation in the repair of sciatic nerve injury from the angle of biomechanics.

RESULTS

Histomorphology of sciatic nerve injury models with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting

Scanning electron microscopy revealed that after tensile testing, the axon and myelin sheath were torn; myelinated nerve fibers were irregular; fiber diameter and myelin sheath thickness were unequal; a few myelinated nerve fibers were mildly swollen and the basilar membrane vessel was obstructed. There were no significant differences in the histomorphology of sciatic nerves between poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Histomorphology of sciatic nerve injury models after bridging with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) conduit and autogenous nerve (scanning electron microscope, × 400).

(A) Torn axon and myelin sheath and irregular myelinated nerve fibers after autogenous nerve grafting.

(B) A few mildly swollen myelinated nerve fibers obstructed the basilar membrane vessels after PLGA conduit transplantation (arrow).

Histomorphology of sciatic nerve injury models after bridging with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) conduit and autogenous nerve (scanning electron microscope, × 400). (A) Torn axon and myelin sheath and irregular myelinated nerve fibers after autogenous nerve grafting. (B) A few mildly swollen myelinated nerve fibers obstructed the basilar membrane vessels after PLGA conduit transplantation (arrow).

Tensile mechanical property of injured sciatic nerve after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit and autogenous nerve grafting

Tensile test results revealed that tensile maximum load, maximum stress, maximum strain, elastic limit load and elastic limit stress of sciatic nerve injury models were significantly lower after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting compared with the normal controls (P < 0.05)[34]. Tensile maximum load, maximum stress, elastic limit load and elastic limit stress were significantly higher (P < 0.05), but elastic limit strain and tensile maximum strain were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in sciatic nerve injury models after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation compared with autogenous nerve grafting (Tables 1–3).
Table 1

Tensile test results of injured sciatic nerve after autogenous nerve grafting

Table 3

Difference between normal sciatic nerve and injured sciatic nerves after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) conduit transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting in tensile tests

Tensile test results of injured sciatic nerve after autogenous nerve grafting Tensile test results of injured sciatic nerve after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation Difference between normal sciatic nerve and injured sciatic nerves after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) conduit transplantation and autogenous nerve grafting in tensile tests Curve fitting of tensile data between autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups was performed using regression analysis, and their stress-strain curves were then obtained. First stage: when the samples in the autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups achieved 0–4.6% strain and 0–3.8% strain, respectively, the stress-strain curve showed an exponential relationship. Second stage: when the samples in the autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups achieved 4.6–12.0% strain and 3.8–9.6% strain, respectively, the stress-strain curve showed a linear relationship. Third stage: when the samples in the autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups achieved 12.0–14.3% strain and 9.6–11.2% strain, respectively, the stress-strain curve showed an exponential relationship. Fourth stage: when the samples in the autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups achieved 14.3–18.0% strain and 11.2–14.7% strain, respectively, the stress-strain curve showed plastic deformation. The deformation increased steadily, and the specimen almost lost bearing capacity and tended to be destroyed (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Stress-strain curve of sciatic nerve specimens in the autogenous nerve grafting and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) conduit transplantation groups.

Stress-strain curve changes result in an exponential relationship. The stress-strain curves of the two groups exhibited similarity.

Stress-strain curve of sciatic nerve specimens in the autogenous nerve grafting and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) conduit transplantation groups. Stress-strain curve changes result in an exponential relationship. The stress-strain curves of the two groups exhibited similarity.

DISCUSSION

Tensile testing is an important method to compare the mechanical properties of sciatic nerve after autogenous nerve grafting and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation in a model of sciatic nerve injury. Cadaver race, gender, age, health status and vocation can introduce errors. To make the experimental data more reliable, this study adopted the following measures: sciatic nerve was obtained from fresh healthy male adult cadavers. We tried to use the specimen within 48 hours. Each specimen was preset. Sciatic nerve injury models were replicated by the same highly qualified surgeon from the Department of Microsurgery through suturing the same site as the specimen, and the number of stitches was identical. Tension speed and ambient temperature were identical. Each single sciatic nerve undergoing autogenous nerve grafting and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation was randomly selected to receive histomorphological observation after tensile testing. Histomorphological observation results suggest that there was no significant difference in injured sciatic nerve after autogenous nerve grafting and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation. Using previously published results[34] of tensile testing of normal sciatic nerve as normal controls, results from our study revealed that the mechanical properties were better in the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation group than the autogenous nerve graft group. Under loading conditions, the tendencies of change in stress-strain curves of sciatic nerve injury models were identical between autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups. The biomaterials for sciatic nerve injury should have good biodegradation, biocompatibility, plasticity, a definite mechanical strength, and can maintain a certain shape for some time after transplantation to ensure mechanical support before tissue regeneration[424344]. However, these properties can antagonize the stress produced by surrounding tissues during nerve regeneration and the stress produced by extension and flexion at the anastomotic site of nerve and nerve stump. Therefore, it is important to select suitable artificial materials and the correct method of preparation to produce a scaffold with suitable structure and mechanical properties. Experimental results suggest that a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit (ratio of lactic acid to glycolic acid = 70:30), created using NaCl as a pore-foaming agent (mass ratio of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) to NaCl = 1:9), has defined intensity, elasticity and plasticity, and can be used for sciatic nerve injury transplantation. A previous study reported the tensile mechanical properties of normal sciatic nerve specimen of gluteus maximus muscle of normal Chinese adult male cadavers[34]. Thus, in our study we did not set a normal control group, but used the normal control group from the previous study[34]. Abundant previous studies mainly examined the biocompatibility, biodegradation and mechanical strength of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) materials and conduits, and the mechanical properties of the injured sciatic nerve after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation in animal in vitro studies, such as in rats[45464748]. The difference of our study to these other studies is that we selected sciatic nerve specimens from fresh human cadavers to replicate sciatic nerve injury models. The injured sciatic nerve received autogenous nerve grafting and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation, followed by tensile testing. Stress-strain curve fitting between autogenous nerve grafting and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups was conducted using regression analysis to compare the difference in mechanical properties of sciatic nerves. This study provided a biomechanical basis for poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation for sciatic nerve injury. Although it is an in vitro experiment, it is similar to clinical sciatic nerve injury repaired with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation. Human cadaver sciatic nerve specimens are limited, so this study only simulated 10-mm long sciatic nerve injury models. Further studies addressing various injury models and various types of stresses deserve further investigations. Because of individual differences of various biomaterials, in vitro experimental data have some definite limitations, but is nonetheless still valuable for the clinic. After transplantation, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduits exhibited good intensity, elasticity and plasticity, indicating that poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit is fit for the repair of sciatic nerve injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design

Contrast observation, biomechanics experiment.

Time and setting

Experiments were performed at the Mechanics Experiment Center, Jilin University, China from December 2009 to August 2012.

Materials

Bilateral sciatic nerve specimens of gluteus maximus muscle were obtained from eight fresh normal Chinese adult male cadavers who died from acute head trauma, aged 25–30 years old. The cadavers were provided by the Norman Bethune Health Science Centre of Jilin University, China. A total of 16 bilateral sciatic nerves of the gluteus maximus muscle were collected within 24 hours after death, and stored in a container containing saline. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (ratio of lactic acid and glycolic acid = 70:30) was purchased from Changchun Sinobiomaterials Co., Ltd. (Changchun, Jilin Province, China).

Methods

Preparation of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit

In accordance with previously published studies[3239], poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) was dissolved in dichloromethane. NaCl particles of 200–300 μm served as pore-foaming agent. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) was mixed with NaCl at a mass ratio of 1:9. The mixture was poured into a prefabricated mold, and made into 30 conduits of 10 mm length, 11 mm outer diameter and 9 mm inner diameter. The mixture in the mold was placed at room temperature and volatilized in a fume hood for 96 hours. After stripping, the scaffolds were obtained and placed in a vacuum oven for drying at 37°C for 48 hours, and then immersed in an 800-mL beaker containing deionized water for 96 hours. The deionized water was replaced once every 4 hours. The scaffolds were dried in a drying box at 37°C for 48 hours, in a vacuum oven for drying at 37°C for 48 hours, and then placed in a dryer.

Preparation of sciatic nerve specimens

After 1 day of storage, each of 15 sciatic nerves of gluteus maximus muscle was cut into two samples with a scalpel by the same highly qualified surgeon from the Department of Microsurgery. Thirty 40-mm-long samples were equally and randomly assigned to autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups.

Replication of sciatic nerve injury models

In accordance with a previous study[34], models of sciatic nerve injury were replicated by cutting the sample to make a 10-mm-long defect by a highly qualified physician with a S-5 aseptic plastic-handled scalpel (Huaian Lianhe Yikang Medical Supplies Co., Ltd., Xuyi, Jiangsu Province, China).

Repair of sciatic nerve injury

The samples were separately bridged with autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit using 7-0 nylon thread (Qingdao Nesco Medical Co., Ltd., Qingdao, Shandong Province, China). Eight stitches were sutured in each sample at the same site.

Tensile test

Tensile testing was conducted on an Autocontrol Electronic Universal Testing Machine (Changchun Research Institute for Testing, Changchun, Jilin Province, China). The length and diameter of each sample were measured under a reading microscope (Third Optical Instrument Factory, Changchun, Jilin Province, China). In the autogenous nerve graft group, the sample was 40 mm long, 11.1–11.3 mm outer diameter and 9.1–9.2 mm inner diameter. In the poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit graft group, the sample was 40 mm long, 11.0–11.2 mm outer diameter and 9.0–9.3 mm inner diameter. In accordance with a previously published method[49], each sample was subjected to loading and unloading 10 times for presetting. This experiment simulated normal human body temperature of 36.5 ± 1.0°C. The samples in the two groups were placed in the chuck of the testing machine, and underwent tension at 5 mm/min. After testing, the Autocontrol Electronic Universal Testing Machine automatically output maximum load, maximum stress, elastic limit strain, maximum strain, elastic limit load and elastic limit stress and stress-strain curve.

Histological observation

Cross sections of one sciatic nerve at the same site from the autogenous nerve graft and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation groups were separately and randomly selected, prefixed in 4% glutaral, postfixed in 1% osmic acid, dehydrated in acetone, and clinically point dried, followed by vacuum coating with gold palladium by direct-current sputtering. Nerve cross sections were observed under a field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) to compare the changes in nerve cells, myelin sheaths, axons and basilar membranes.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and expressed as mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance was used. Intergroup comparison was performed using Sceffe method. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Table 2

Tensile test results of injured sciatic nerve after poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit transplantation

  36 in total

1.  Assessment of processed human amniotic membrane as a protective barrier in rat model of sciatic nerve injury.

Authors:  Hao Meng; Mo Li; Fengjian You; Junjie Du; Zhuojing Luo
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiations of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on a nanofibrous scaffold with designed pore network.

Authors:  Jiang Hu; Kai Feng; Xiaohua Liu; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Preparation and integration of human amnion nerve conduits using a light-activated technique.

Authors:  Anne C O'Neill; Mark A Randolph; Kenneth E Bujold; Irene E Kochevar; Robert W Redmond; Jonathan M Winograd
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Controlling cellular activity by manipulating silicone surface roughness.

Authors:  Babu R Prasad; Michael A Brook; Terry Smith; Shigui Zhao; Yang Chen; Heather Sheardown; Renita D'souza; Yuri Rochev
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.268

5.  Modulation of MAPK and Akt signaling pathways in proximal segment of injured sciatic nerves.

Authors:  Guixin Sun; Zengchun Li; Xinhong Wang; Wenjie Tang; Youzhen Wei
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  [Mechanism of rat sciatic nerve regeneration induced by human hair keratin].

Authors:  Lian-mei Hu; Zhong-xian Piao; Qi-wei Wang; Wan-shan Wang; Wei-wang Gu; Ying-jie Piao
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2008-07

7.  Enhancement of regeneration with glia cell line-derived neurotrophic factor-transduced human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells after sciatic nerve crush injury.

Authors:  Fu-Chou Cheng; Ming-Hong Tai; Meei-Ling Sheu; Chun-Jung Chen; Dar-Yu Yang; Hong-Lin Su; Shu-Peng Ho; Shu-Zhen Lai; Hung-Chuan Pan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Exploration and neurolysis for the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with a sciatic nerve palsy after total hip replacement.

Authors:  S Kyriacou; P S Pastides; V K Singh; L Jeyaseelan; M Sinisi; M Fox
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Strain and stress variations in the human amniotic membrane and fresh corpse autologous sciatic nerve anastomosis in a model of sciatic nerve injury.

Authors:  Chuangang Peng; Qiao Zhang; Qi Yang; Qingsan Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  n5-STZ Diabetic Model Develops Alterations in Sciatic Nerve and Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons of Wistar Rats.

Authors:  Francisco Walber Ferreira-da-Silva; Kerly Shamyra da Silva-Alves; Matheus Lemos-Dos-Santos; Keciany Alves de Oliveira; Humberto Cavalcante Joca; Otoni Cardoso do Vale; Andrelina Noronha Coelho-de-Souza; José Henrique Leal-Cardoso
Journal:  ISRN Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Conduit-based Nerve Repairs Provide Greater Resistance to Tension Compared with Primary Repairs: A Biomechanical Analysis on Large Animal Samples.

Authors:  Kumaran Rasappan; Vaikunthan Rajaratnam; Yoke-Rung Wong
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-12-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.