Literature DB >> 20363600

Controlling cellular activity by manipulating silicone surface roughness.

Babu R Prasad1, Michael A Brook, Terry Smith, Shigui Zhao, Yang Chen, Heather Sheardown, Renita D'souza, Yuri Rochev.   

Abstract

Silicone elastomers exhibit a broad range of beneficial properties that are exploited in biomaterials. In some cases, however, problems can arise at silicone elastomer interfaces. With breast implants, for example, the fibrous capsule that forms at the silicone interface can undergo contracture, which can lead to the need for revision surgery. The relationship between surface topography and wound healing--which could impact on the degree of contracture--has not been examined in detail. To address this, we prepared silicone elastomer samples with rms surface roughnesses varying from 88 to 650 nm and examined the growth of 3T3 fibroblasts on these surfaces. The PicoGreen assay demonstrated that fibroblast growth decreased with increases in surface roughness. Relatively smooth (approximately 88 nm) PDMS samples had ca. twice as much fibroblast DNA per unit area than the 'bumpy' (approximately 378 nm) and very rough (approximately 604 and approximately 650 nm) PDMS samples. While the PDMS sample with roughness of approximately 650 nm had significantly fewer fibroblasts at 24h than the TCP control, fibroblasts on the smooth silicone surprisingly reached confluence much more rapidly than on TCP, the gold standard for cell culture. Thus, increasing the surface roughness at the sub-micron scale could be a strategy worthy of consideration to help mitigate fibroblast growth and control fibrous capsule formation on silicone elastomer implants. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20363600     DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces        ISSN: 0927-7765            Impact factor:   5.268


  10 in total

1.  Culture of primary bovine chondrocytes on a continuously expanding surface inhibits dedifferentiation.

Authors:  Derek H Rosenzweig; Mourad Matmati; Ghazaleh Khayat; Sidharth Chaudhry; Boris Hinz; Thomas M Quinn
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  A depth-sensing technique on 3D-printed compensator for total body irradiation patient measurement and treatment planning.

Authors:  Min-Young Lee; Bin Han; Cesare Jenkins; Lei Xing; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Fibroblasts: Diverse Cells Critical to Biomaterials Integration.

Authors:  Riley T Hannan; Shayn M Peirce; Thomas H Barker
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-06-13

4.  In Vivo and In Vitro Fibroblasts' Behavior and Capsular Formation in Correlation with Smooth and Textured Silicone Surfaces.

Authors:  Shu-Qing Huang; Yao Chen; Qiong Zhu; Yi-Ming Zhang; Ze-Yuan Lei; Xin Zhou; Dong-Li Fan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 5.  Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.

Authors:  Mathew Baldwin; Sarah Snelling; Stephanie Dakin; Andrew Carr
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Customizable Implant-specific and Tissue-Specific Extracellular Matrix Protein Coatings Fabricated Using Atmospheric Plasma.

Authors:  Fei Tan; Mohamed Al-Rubeai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-27

7.  Viscoelasticity of repaired sciatic nerve by poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) tubes.

Authors:  Chengdong Piao; Peng Li; Guangyao Liu; Kun Yang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.135

8.  Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) conduit for repair of injured sciatic nerve: A mechanical analysis.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Changfu Zhao; Peng Li; Guangyao Liu; Min Luo
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  The Physicochemical Characteristics of Prosthetic Materials and Their Influence on Their Clinical Properties.

Authors:  Katarzyna Adamska; Beata Strzemiecka; Rafał Brożek; Ryszard Koczorowski; Adam Voelkel
Journal:  Chromatographia       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.044

Review 10.  Scaffold-Mediated Immunoengineering as Innovative Strategy for Tendon Regeneration.

Authors:  Valentina Russo; Mohammad El Khatib; Giuseppe Prencipe; Adrián Cerveró-Varona; Maria Rita Citeroni; Annunziata Mauro; Paolo Berardinelli; Melisa Faydaver; Arlette A Haidar-Montes; Maura Turriani; Oriana Di Giacinto; Marcello Raspa; Ferdinando Scavizzi; Fabrizio Bonaventura; Liliana Liverani; Aldo R Boccaccini; Barbara Barboni
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.