Literature DB >> 25205616

Sensitivity of systemic inflammatory response syndrome for critical illness among ED patients.

Michael M Liao1, Dennis Lezotte2, Steven R Lowenstein3, Kevin Howard4, Zachary Finley4, Zipei Feng4, Richard L Byyny5, Jeffrey D Sankoff5, Ivor S Douglas6, Jason S Haukoos7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the diagnostic accuracy of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for critical illness among emergency department (ED) patients with and without infection. Our objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of SIRS criteria for critical illness in ED patients.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of ED patients at an urban academic hospital. Standardized chart abstraction was performed on a random sample of all adult ED medical patients admitted to the hospital during a 1-year period, excluding repeat visits, transfers, ED deaths, and primary surgical or psychiatric admissions. The binary composite outcome of critical illness was defined as 24 hours or longer in intensive care or inhospital death. Presumed infection was defined as receiving antibiotics within 48 hours of admission. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were calculated using ED triage vital signs and initial white blood cell count.
RESULTS: We studied 1152 patients; 39% had SIRS, 27% had presumed infection, and 23% had critical illness (2% had inhospital mortality, and 22% had ≥24 hours in intensive care). Of patients with SIRS, 38% had presumed infection. Of patients without SIRS, 21% had presumed infection. The sensitivity of SIRS criteria for critical illness was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-58%) in all patients, 66% (95% CI, 56%-75%) in patients with presumed infection, and 43% (95% CI, 36%-51%) in patients without presumed infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome at ED triage, as currently defined, has poor sensitivity for critical illness in medical patients admitted from the ED.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25205616      PMCID: PMC4254326          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  24 in total

1.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Medical record reviews in emergency medicine: the blessing and the curse.

Authors:  Steven R Lowenstein
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 3.  Incorporation bias in studies of diagnostic tests: how to avoid being biased about bias.

Authors:  Andrew Worster; Christopher Carpenter
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 4.  Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports.

Authors:  W R Mower
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Dear SIRS, I'm sorry to say that I don't like you...

Authors:  J L Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The association of sepsis syndrome and organ dysfunction with mortality in emergency department patients with suspected infection.

Authors:  Nathan Shapiro; Michael D Howell; David W Bates; Derek C Angus; Long Ngo; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Does severe non-infectious SIRS differ from severe sepsis? Results from a multi-centre Australian and New Zealand intensive care unit study.

Authors:  Joel M Dulhunty; Jeffrey Lipman; Simon Finfer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?

Authors:  E H Gilbert; S R Lowenstein; J Koziol-McLain; D C Barta; J Steiner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: incidence, morbidities and outcomes in surgical ICU patients.

Authors:  D Pittet; S Rangel-Frausto; N Li; D Tarara; M Costigan; L Rempe; P Jebson; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  James A Russell; Keith R Walley; Joel Singer; Anthony C Gordon; Paul C Hébert; D James Cooper; Cheryl L Holmes; Sangeeta Mehta; John T Granton; Michelle M Storms; Deborah J Cook; Jeffrey J Presneill; Dieter Ayers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Risk factors for the fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Likun Zhu; Rui Jiang; Lijun Pei; Xu Li; Xiangjun Kong; Xinwei Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

2.  Fungal Infection in Acutely Decompensated Cirrhosis Patients: Value of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score.

Authors:  Shahid Habib; Sandeep Yarlagadda; Teresia A Carreon; Lindsey M Schader; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2020-10-31

3.  Combined biomarkers discriminate a low likelihood of bacterial infection among surgical intensive care unit patients with suspected sepsis.

Authors:  Brendan J Kelly; Ebbing Lautenbach; Irving Nachamkin; Susan E Coffin; Jeffrey S Gerber; Barry D Fuchs; Charles Garrigan; Xiaoyan Han; Warren B Bilker; Jacqueleen Wise; Pam Tolomeo; Jennifer H Han
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Making the journey safe: recognising and responding to severe sepsis in accident and emergency.

Authors:  Sarah Pinnington; Brigid Atterton; Sarah Ingleby
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-09-19

5.  Comparative prognostic accuracy of sepsis scores for hospital mortality in adults with suspected infection in non-ICU and ICU at an academic public hospital.

Authors:  Christopher P Kovach; Grant S Fletcher; Kristina E Rudd; Rosemary M Grant; David J Carlbom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Risk factors for postpartum sepsis: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Samina Bakhtawar; Sana Sheikh; Rahat Qureshi; Zahra Hoodbhoy; Beth Payne; Iqbal Azam; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura Magee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department.

Authors:  Rebecca Sparks; Arisa Harada; Ruchir Chavada; Christopher Trethewy
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.090

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.