Literature DB >> 25205186

[Osteosarcoma: reliability and quality of the information in the internet].

Michael Schippinger1, Paul Ruckenstuhl, Jörg Friesenbichler, Andreas Leithner.   

Abstract

The World Wide Web has grown during the last years to a considerable source of medical information for experts as well as for laymen and patients. The quality of this information is subjected to some limitation linked with the structure of the Internet and the management of Internet pages. The cross- sectional study presented evaluates and compares quality and reliability of information with respect of osteosarcoma in the most common German-language Internet pages for medical information. As both, one of the most common primary malignant bone tumors and its peak of incidence at the age of childhood and youth, osteosarcoma is considered of significant importance in orthopedic oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25205186     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-014-0304-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of internet recommendations for prehospital care of venomous snake bites.

Authors:  Sarah Barker; Nathan P Charlton; Christopher P Holstege
Journal:  Wilderness Environ Med       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.518

2.  Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey.

Authors:  Michele L Ybarra; Michael Suman
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Scope, completeness, and accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Hyla H Polen; Maged N Kamel Boulos; Joan H Dzenowagis
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  How good is Google? The quality of otolaryngology information on the internet.

Authors:  Max D Pusz; Scott E Brietzke
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Internet is useful for information on rare conditions.

Authors:  O R Dearlove; A Sharples; C Stone
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-23

6.  Wikipedia and osteosarcoma: a trustworthy patients' information?

Authors:  Andreas Leithner; Werner Maurer-Ertl; Mathias Glehr; Joerg Friesenbichler; Katharina Leithner; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

Authors:  D Charnock; S Shepperd; G Needham; R Gann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  The World Health Organization's histologic classification of bone tumors. A commentary on the second edition.

Authors:  F Schajowicz; H A Sissons; L H Sobin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices.

Authors:  Charlotte E Rees; Jillyan E Ford; Charlotte E Sheard
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-07

10.  The impact of search engine selection and sorting criteria on vaccination beliefs and attitudes: two experiments manipulating Google output.

Authors:  Ahmed Allam; Peter Johannes Schulz; Kent Nakamoto
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Like or Dislike? Impact of Facebook on Ewing Sarcoma Treatment.

Authors:  Paul Ruckenstuhl; Michael Schippinger; Paul Liebmann; Andreas Leithner; Gerwin Bernhardt
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2016-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.