Literature DB >> 25204806

Clinico-pathological significance of the molecular alterations of the SPOP gene in prostate cancer.

María García-Flores1, Irene Casanova-Salas1, José Rubio-Briones2, Ana Calatrava3, José Domínguez-Escrig2, Luis Rubio1, Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus2, Antonio Fernández-Serra1, Zaida García-Casado1, José Antonio López-Guerrero4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor recently described to be mutated in prostate cancer (PCa). Hence, studying the gene expression profile and the presence of SPOP mutations in PCa and understanding its clinico-pathological significance as prognostic and therapeutic biomarker are important to further understand its role in PCa development. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 265 paraffin-embedded PCa samples from patients with more than 5 years of follow-up and treated with radical prostatectomy were collected at our institution for SPOP evaluation. RT-qPCR analysis was performed for expression studies while mutations were assessed by next generation sequencing. Relationship with prognosis was analysed using log-rank analysis and multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS: SPOP was found to be strongly down-regulated in PCa (median=0.24; range=0.04-9.98) and its expression was associated with both, biochemical (p=0.003) and clinical progression free survival (p=0.023), the very low SPOP expression levels being associated to the worst prognosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that low levels of SPOP independently predicted a worse prognosis for both, biochemical (Hazard ratio (HR)=0.5; confidence interval (CI) 95% [0.4-0.9], p=0.011) and clinical progression (HR=0.6; IC 95% [0.4-1], p=0.046). SPOP mutations were found in 10% of TMPRSS2-ERG (T2E)-negative cases. Log-rank tests showed that mutations were significantly associated with biochemical progression free survival (BPFS) (p=0.009) and also were significant in the multivariable analysis (HR=3.4; IC 95% [1.5-7.6], p=0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that prognosis varies depending on SPOP expression and mutational status, hence, defining a new biotype of PCa associated with a worse prognosis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Biotype; Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25204806     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  19 in total

Review 1.  Implications of ubiquitin ligases in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jianfei Qi; Lingling Fan; Arif Hussain
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 2.  Functional analysis of Cullin 3 E3 ligases in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Jianping Guo; Zhiwei Wang; Brian J North; Kaixiong Tao; Xiangpeng Dai; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 3.  Molecular subtyping of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel D Kaffenberger; Christopher E Barbieri
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 4.  Somatic Mutations in Prostate Cancer: Closer to Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  M J Alvarez-Cubero; L J Martinez-Gonzalez; I Robles-Fernandez; J Martinez-Herrera; G Garcia-Rodriguez; M Pascual-Geler; J M Cozar; J A Lorente
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.074

5.  Signature for Prostate Cancer Based on Autophagy-Related Genes and a Nomogram for Quantitative Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Chenghao Wen; Qintao Ge; Bangshun Dai; Jiawei Li; Feixiang Yang; Jialin Meng; Shenglin Gao; Song Fan; Li Zhang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  GLI3 Is Stabilized by SPOP Mutations and Promotes Castration Resistance via Functional Cooperation with Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Marieke Burleson; Janice J Deng; Tai Qin; Thu Minh Duong; Yuqian Yan; Xiang Gu; Debodipta Das; Acarizia Easley; Michael A Liss; P Renee Yew; Roble Bedolla; Addanki Pratap Kumar; Tim Hui-Ming Huang; Yi Zou; Yidong Chen; Chun-Liang Chen; Haojie Huang; Lu-Zhe Sun; Thomas G Boyer
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 6.333

Review 7.  SPOP and cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alison Clark; Marieke Burleson
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 8.  Molecular Subtypes of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kaveri Arora; Christopher E Barbieri
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 9.  Clinical variability and molecular heterogeneity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Shoag; Christopher E Barbieri
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  The diverse roles of SPOP in prostate cancer and kidney cancer.

Authors:  Zhiwei Wang; Yizuo Song; Miaomiao Ye; Xiaoming Dai; Xueqiong Zhu; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.