Literature DB >> 25204423

Evaluation of patient education materials: the example of circulating cell free DNA testing for aneuploidy.

Edward M Kloza1, Paula K Haddow, Jacquelyn V Halliday, Barbara M O'Brien, Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian, Glenn E Palomaki.   

Abstract

Informed consent is the process by which the treating health care provider discloses appropriate information to a competent patient so that the patient may make a voluntary choice to accept or refuse treatment. When the analysis of circulating cell free DNA (ccfDNA) became commercially available in 2011 through the Prenatal Diagnostic Laboratory at Women & Infants Hospital of Providence, Rhode Island to "high-risk" women, it provided an opportunity to examine how commercial laboratories informed potential consumers. We identified, via an internet search, four laboratories offering such testing in the United States and one in Europe. We evaluated patient educational materials (PEMs) from each using the Flesch Reading Ease method and a modified version of the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) criteria. Pamphlets were also reviewed for their inclusion of content recommendations from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, the National Society of Genetic Counselors, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists jointly with the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, and the American College of Genetics and Genomics. Reading levels were typically high (10th-12th grade). None of the pamphlets met all SAM criteria evaluated nor did any pamphlet include all recommended content items. To comply with readability and content recommendations more closely, Women & Infants Hospital created a new pamphlet to which it applied the same criteria, and also subjected it to focus group assessment. These types of analyses can serve as a model for future evaluations of similar patient educational materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25204423     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9758-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  14 in total

1.  Why organizations continue to create patient information leaflets with readability and usability problems: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Iddo Gal; Ayelet Prigat
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2004-12-21

2.  Health literacy: a key ingredient for managing personal health.

Authors:  Barbara F Schloman
Journal:  Online J Issues Nurs       Date:  2004-02-12

3.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

4.  Discordant noninvasive prenatal testing results in a patient subsequently diagnosed with metastatic disease.

Authors:  C Michael Osborne; Emily Hardisty; Patricia Devers; Kathleen Kaiser-Rogers; Melissa A Hayden; William Goodnight; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Noninvasive prenatal testing for microdeletion syndromes and expanded trisomies: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Neeta L Vora; Barbara M O'Brien
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Assessment of commonly available education materials in heart failure clinics.

Authors:  Kimberli Taylor-Clarke; Queen Henry-Okafor; Clare Murphy; Madeline Keyes; Russell Rothman; Andre Churchwell; George A Mensah; Douglas Sawyer; Uchechukwu K A Sampson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Undergoing prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia.

Authors:  Sue Hall; Lyn Chitty; Elizabeth Dormandy; Amelia Hollywood; Hajo I J Wildschut; Albert Fortuny; Bianca Masturzo; Jiøí Santavý; Madhulika Kabra; Runmei Ma; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Non-invasive prenatal testing with cell-free DNA: US physician attitudes toward implementation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Thomas J Musci; Genevieve Fairbrother; Annette Batey; Jennifer Bruursema; Craig Struble; Ken Song
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Noninvasive prenatal testing/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: the position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Patricia L Devers; Amy Cronister; Kelly E Ormond; Flavia Facio; Campbell K Brasington; Pamela Flodman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  What patients are reading about noninvasive prenatal testing: an evaluation of Internet content and implications for patient-centered care.

Authors:  M B Mercer; P K Agatisa; R M Farrell
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of Informed Consent Preferences for Multiplex Genetic Carrier Screening among a Diverse Population.

Authors:  Ashley Reeves; Angela Trepanier
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Too Dense and Too Detailed: Evaluation of the Health Literacy Attributes of an Informed Consent Document.

Authors:  Vanessa W Simonds; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-12-10

5.  Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials.

Authors:  Marsha Michie; Stephanie A Kraft; Mollie A Minear; Roberta R Ryan; Megan A Allyse
Journal:  Ethics Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13

6.  The clinical utility of DNA-based screening for fetal aneuploidy by primary obstetrical care providers in the general pregnancy population.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Edward M Kloza; Barbara M O'Brien; Elizabeth E Eklund; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Ethnicity and Language Proficiency Differences in the Provision of and Intention to Use Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrome and Congenital Anomalies. A Prospective, Non-selected, Register-Based Study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ingrid A Peters; Kirsten M Heetkamp; Nicolette T C Ursem; Eric A P Steegers; Semiha Denktaş; Maarten F C M Knapen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03

8.  Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Emilia Niemiec; Danya F Vears; Pascal Borry; Heidi Carmen Howard
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-08-31

Review 9.  Principles and theory guiding development and delivery of patient education in disorders of thrombosis and hemostasis: Reviewing the current literature.

Authors:  Julia Hews-Girard; Christine Guelcher; Jennifer Meldau; Ellen McDonald; Fiona Newall
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-09-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.