Literature DB >> 24823864

What patients are reading about noninvasive prenatal testing: an evaluation of Internet content and implications for patient-centered care.

M B Mercer1, P K Agatisa, R M Farrell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients' use of the Internet as a source of health information is increasing. The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate Internet-based information about noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), an important new genetic test currently available to high-risk women in early pregnancy.
METHODS: Websites were sampled using leading search engines to mirror Internet-based search patterns of individuals seeking information about NIPT. Content analysis was conducted to assess website reading level, quality, and content.
RESULTS: Basic information about NIPT use as a screening test was accurately described. Overall, sampled websites lacked balance and comprehensive information about NIPT and the complexity of decision making involved in electing for its use. All websites were written at reading levels higher than currently recommended levels for public health information.
CONCLUSION: While online resources should be used with reservation, they can be an important tool to support effective communication and patient-centered care. Online information can help both health care providers and pregnant patients who face a growing number of fetal genetic testing options.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24823864     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  10 in total

1.  Sexual Health Literacy, a Strategy for the Challenges of Sexual Life of Infertile Women: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Zahra Rakhshaee; Raziyeh Maasoumi; Saharnaz Nedjat; Zohreh Khakbazan
Journal:  Galen Med J       Date:  2020-12-28

2.  NIPT and Informed Consent: an Assessment of Patient Understanding of a Negative NIPT Result.

Authors:  Julie L Piechan; Karrie A Hines; Daniel L Koller; Kristyne Stone; Kimberly Quaid; Wilfredo Torres-Martinez; Divya Wilson Mathews; Tatiana Foroud; Lola Cook
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Evaluation of patient education materials: the example of circulating cell free DNA testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Edward M Kloza; Paula K Haddow; Jacquelyn V Halliday; Barbara M O'Brien; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; Glenn E Palomaki
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Patient Perception of Negative Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results.

Authors:  A Theresa Wittman; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Salma Nassef; Blair Stevens; Claire N Singletary
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2016-10

5.  Quality of consumer-oriented websites containing information about the second trimester ultrasound examination during pregnancy.

Authors:  Susanne Georgsson; Tommy Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Accessibility and Applicability of Currently Available e-Mental Health Programs for Depression for People With Poststroke Aphasia: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Stephanie Jane Clunne; Brooke Jade Ryan; Annie Jane Hill; Caitlin Brandenburg; Ian Kneebone
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Online direct-to-consumer messages about non-invasive prenatal genetic testing.

Authors:  Ruth M Farrell; Patricia K Agatisa; MaryBeth Mercer; Marissa B Coleridge
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2016-03-10

8.  Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catrin Eriksson; Matilda Skinstad; Susanne Georgsson; Tommy Carlsson
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Michelle Peter; Hannah McInnes-Dean; Jane Fisher; Dagmar Tapon; Lyn S Chitty; Melissa Hill
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 3.242

10.  Quality of Patient Information Websites About Congenital Heart Defects: Mixed-Methods Study of Perspectives Among Individuals With Experience of a Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Tommy Carlsson; Ulla Melander Marttala; Barbro Wadensten; Gunnar Bergman; Ove Axelsson; Elisabet Mattsson
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2017-09-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.