Literature DB >> 25203980

Uncertainty quantification in transcranial magnetic stimulation via high-dimensional model representation.

Luis J Gomez, Abdulkadir C Yücel, Luis Hernandez-Garcia, Stephan F Taylor, Eric Michielssen.   

Abstract

A computational framework for uncertainty quantification in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is presented. The framework leverages high-dimensional model representations (HDMRs), which approximate observables (i.e., quantities of interest such as electric (E) fields induced inside targeted cortical regions) via series of iteratively constructed component functions involving only the most significant random variables (i.e., parameters that characterize the uncertainty in a TMS setup such as the position and orientation of TMS coils, as well as the size, shape, and conductivity of the head tissue). The component functions of HDMR expansions are approximated via a multielement probabilistic collocation (ME-PC) method. While approximating each component function, a quasi-static finite-difference simulator is used to compute observables at integration/collocation points dictated by the ME-PC method. The proposed framework requires far fewer simulations than traditional Monte Carlo methods for providing highly accurate statistical information (e.g., the mean and standard deviation) about the observables. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed framework are demonstrated via its application to the statistical characterization of E-fields generated by TMS inside cortical regions of an MRI-derived realistic head model. Numerical results show that while uncertainties in tissue conductivities have negligible effects on TMS operation, variations in coil position/orientation and brain size significantly affect the induced E-fields. Our numerical results have several implications for the use of TMS during depression therapy: 1) uncertainty in the coil position and orientation may reduce the response rates of patients; 2) practitioners should favor targets on the crest of a gyrus to obtain maximal stimulation; and 3) an increasing scalp-to-cortex distance reduces the magnitude of E-fields on the surface and inside the cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25203980     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2353993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  6 in total

1.  Design of transcranial magnetic stimulation coils with optimal trade-off between depth, focality, and energy.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 2.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

3.  Conditions for numerically accurate TMS electric field simulation.

Authors:  Luis J Gomez; Moritz Dannhauer; Lari M Koponen; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  An FMM-FFT Accelerated SIE Simulator for Analyzing EM Wave Propagation in Mine Environments Loaded With Conductors.

Authors:  Abdulkadir C Yucel; Weitian Sheng; Chenming Zhou; Yang Liu; Hakan Bagci; Eric Michielssen
Journal:  IEEE J Multiscale Multiphys Comput Tech       Date:  2018-02-05

5.  The influence of corticospinal activity on TMS-evoked activity and connectivity in healthy subjects: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Petrichella; Nessa Johnson; Bin He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genetic Algorithm for TMS Coil Position Optimization in Stroke Treatment.

Authors:  Shujie Lu; Haoyu Jiang; Chengwei Li; Baoyu Hong; Pu Zhang; Wenli Liu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.