Literature DB >> 25203376

Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler.

Carlos Placer1, Jose M Enríquez-Navascués, Garazi Elorza, Ander Timoteo, Jose A Mugica, Nerea Borda, Yolanda Saralegui, Jose L Elósegui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic complications, including leaks, stenoses, and bleeding, cause considerable mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery. OBJETIVE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in reducing colorectal anastomotic complications.
DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized clinical study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a university hospital within a specialized colorectal unit. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing left colon resection for a benign or malignant condition were eligible. A total of 302 patients participated, including 154 control subjects and 148 with reinforcement. INTERVENTION: Patients were prospectively randomly assigned to reinforcement of circular stapled anastomosis with a bioabsorbable device versus stapled circular anastomosis without reinforcement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the rate of pooled incidences of anastomotic complications (leakage, bleeding, or stenosis). Secondary outcomes were the rate of reoperations and the length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that there were no significant differences in the pooled incidences of anastomotic complications (p = 0.821). Regarding individual complications, we did not observe statistical differences between groups, including leakage (6.6% vs 4.8%; p = 0.518), hemorrhage (1.4% vs 1.3%; p = 0.431), or stenosis (2.9% vs 6.8%; p = 0.128). Again, no significant differences were observed in length of stay (7 days; p = 0.242) or rate of reoperation (7.3% vs 9.6%; p = 0.490). A patient (0.3%) in the control group died. LIMITATIONS: Sample size calculation was performed including all 3 of the complications, which may render it underpowered to detect differences regarding a specific complication. Anastomoses located within 5 cm from the anal verge were excluded from the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained show that bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in a colorectal anastomosis >5 cm from the anal verge does not reduce the rate of pooled anastomotic complications (ie, leaks, bleeding, or stenosis).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25203376     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  8 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Pelvic Anastomosis Without Protective Ileostomy is Safe in Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ekaterina Baron; Vadim Gushchin; Mary Caitlin King; Andrei Nikiforchin; Armando Sardi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Protection of colorectal anastomosis with an intraluminal bypass device for patients undergoing an elective anterior resection: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Reshef; G Ben-Arie; I Pinsk
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Bowel anastomosis leakage following endometriosis surgery: an evidence based analysis of risk factors and prevention techniques.

Authors:  A Vigueras Smith; R Sumak; R Cabrera; W Kondo; H Ferreira
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-10-08

5.  Reduced rate of dehiscence after implementation of a novel technique for creating colonic anastomosis in pediatric patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis in a single institute.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Bailin Chen; Li Xiang; Chunbao Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Mucosa plication reinforced colorectal anastomosis and trans-anal vacuum drainage: a pilot study with preliminary results.

Authors:  Alexander Ferko; Juraj Váňa; Marek Adámik; Adam Švec; Michal Žáček; Michal Demeter; Marián Grendár
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-06-05

7.  Biomaterial-Assisted Anastomotic Healing: Serosal Adhesion of Pectin Films.

Authors:  Yifan Zheng; Aidan F Pierce; Willi L Wagner; Hassan A Khalil; Zi Chen; Charlotta Funaya; Maximilian Ackermann; Steven J Mentzer
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Effect of Biologic Material Reinforcement on Surgical Anastomosis After Gastrectomy-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Won Jun Kim; Chang Min Lee; Liang An; Jong-Han Kim; Sungsoo Park
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.