Joanna Hart1, Scott D Halpern. 1. aDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics and Fostering Improvement in End-of-Life Decision Science (FIELDS) Program at the Perelman School of Medicine bCenter for Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Default options dramatically influence the behavior of decision makers and may serve as effective decision support tools in the ICU. Their use in medicine has increased in an effort to improve efficiency, reduce errors, and harness the potential of healthcare technology. RECENT FINDINGS: Defaults often fall short of their predicted influence when employed in critical care settings as quality improvement interventions. Investigations reporting the use of defaults are often limited by variations in the relative effect across sites. Preimplementation experiments and long-term monitoring studies are lacking. SUMMARY: Defaults in the ICU may help or harm patients and clinical efficiency depending on their format and use. When constructing and encountering defaults, providers should be aware of their powerful and complex influences on decision making. Additional evaluations of the appropriate creation of healthcare defaults and their resulting intended and unintended consequences are needed.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Default options dramatically influence the behavior of decision makers and may serve as effective decision support tools in the ICU. Their use in medicine has increased in an effort to improve efficiency, reduce errors, and harness the potential of healthcare technology. RECENT FINDINGS: Defaults often fall short of their predicted influence when employed in critical care settings as quality improvement interventions. Investigations reporting the use of defaults are often limited by variations in the relative effect across sites. Preimplementation experiments and long-term monitoring studies are lacking. SUMMARY: Defaults in the ICU may help or harm patients and clinical efficiency depending on their format and use. When constructing and encountering defaults, providers should be aware of their powerful and complex influences on decision making. Additional evaluations of the appropriate creation of healthcare defaults and their resulting intended and unintended consequences are needed.
Authors: Scott T Micek; Nareg Roubinian; Tim Heuring; Meghan Bode; Jennifer Williams; Courtney Harrison; Theresa Murphy; Donna Prentice; Brent E Ruoff; Marin H Kollef Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Meeta Prasad; Eric S Holmboe; Rebecca S Lipner; Brian J Hess; Jason D Christie; Scarlett L Bellamy; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel Kobewka; Daren K Heyland; Peter Dodek; Aman Nijjar; Nick Bansback; Michelle Howard; Peter Munene; Elizabeth Kunkel; Alan Forster; Jamie Brehaut; John J You Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Christopher P Bourdeaux; Matthew Jc Thomas; Timothy H Gould; Gaurav Malhotra; Andreas Jarvstad; Timothy Jones; Iain D Gilchrist Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Nicole B Gabler; Elizabeth Cooney; Dylan S Small; Andrea B Troxel; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White; Derek C Angus; George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp; Cindy L Bryce; Scott D Halpern Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 2.692