Literature DB >> 25203128

Solitary pulmonary nodules: Comparison of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion area-detector CT, dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and FDG PET/CT.

Yoshiharu Ohno1, Mizuho Nishio, Hisanobu Koyama, Shinichiro Seki, Maho Tsubakimoto, Yasuko Fujisawa, Takeshi Yoshikawa, Sumiaki Matsumoto, Kazuro Sugimura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the capabilities of dynamic perfusion area-detector computed tomography (CT), dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and positron emission tomography (PET) combined with CT (PET/CT) with use of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from each subject. A total of 198 consecutive patients with 218 nodules prospectively underwent dynamic perfusion area-detector CT, dynamic MR imaging, FDG PET/CT, and microbacterial and/or pathologic examinations. Nodules were classified into three groups: malignant nodules (n = 133) and benign nodules with low (n = 53) or high (n = 32) biologic activity. Total perfusion was determined with dual-input maximum slope models at area-detector CT, maximum and slope of enhancement ratio at MR imaging, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) at PET/CT. Next, all indexes for malignant and benign nodules were compared with the Tukey honest significant difference test. Then, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for each index. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared with the McNemar test.
RESULTS: All indexes showed significant differences between malignant nodules and benign nodules with low biologic activity (P < .0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for total perfusion was significantly larger than that for other indexes (.0006 ≤ P ≤ .04). The specificity and accuracy of total perfusion were significantly higher than those of maximum relative enhancement ratio (specificity, P < .0001; accuracy, P < .0001), slope of enhancement ratio (specificity, P < .0001; accuracy, P < .0001), and SUVmax (specificity, P < .0001; accuracy, P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic perfusion area-detector CT is more specific and accurate than dynamic MR imaging and FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules in routine clinical practice. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25203128     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules: can we do better?

Authors:  Ana María García Vicente; Víctor M Pérez-García; Ángel Soriano Castrejón
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of pulmonary lesions using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging.

Authors:  Lihua Chen; Daihong Liu; Jiuquan Zhang; Bing Xie; Xiaoyue Zhou; Robert Grimm; Xuequan Huang; Jian Wang; Li Feng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Lung cancer screening: nodule identification and characterization.

Authors:  Ioannis Vlahos; Konstantinos Stefanidis; Sarah Sheard; Arjun Nair; Charles Sayer; Joanne Moser
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced CT- and MRI-based perfusion assessment for pulmonary diseases: basics and clinical applications.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Ohno; Hisanobu Koyama; Ho Yun Lee; Sachiko Miura; Takeshi Yoshikawa; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  CT perfusion imaging of lung cancer: benefit of motion correction for blood flow estimates.

Authors:  Lisa L Chu; Robert J Knebel; Aryan D Shay; Jonathan Santos; Ramsey D Badawi; David R Gandara; Friedrich D Knollmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparing the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT versus CT for differentiating benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuzhu Jia; Wanfeng Gong; Zhiping Zhang; Gaofeng Tu; Jiapeng Li; Fanfan Xiong; Hongtao Hou; Yunyi Zhang; Meiqian Wu; Liping Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Overview of MRI for pulmonary functional imaging.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Ohno; Satomu Hanamatsu; Yuki Obama; Takahiro Ueda; Hirotaka Ikeda; Hidekazu Hattori; Kazuhiro Murayama; Hiroshi Toyama
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 8.  Pulmonary Functional Imaging: Part 1-State-of-the-Art Technical and Physiologic Underpinnings.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Ohno; Joon Beom Seo; Grace Parraga; Kyung Soo Lee; Warren B Gefter; Sean B Fain; Mark L Schiebler; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 9.  Dynamic contrast enhanced CT in nodule characterization: How we review and report.

Authors:  Nagmi R Qureshi; Andrew Shah; Rosemary J Eaton; Ken Miles; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT: Which is better in differentiation between malignant and benign solitary pulmonary nodules?

Authors:  Feng Feng; Fulin Qiang; Aijun Shen; Donghui Shi; Aiyan Fu; Haiming Li; Mingzhu Zhang; Ganlin Xia; Peng Cao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.