Literature DB >> 25202659

Diffusion-weighted EPI- and HASTE-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET-CT early during chemoradiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer.

Charlotte S Schouten1, Remco de Bree1, Lisa van der Putten1, Daniel P Noij1, Otto S Hoekstra1, Emile F I Comans1, Birgit I Witte1, Patricia A Doornaert1, C René Leemans1, Jonas A Castelijns1.   

Abstract

MAIN PROBLEM: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) has potential to predict chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and is generally performed using echo-planar imaging (EPI). However, EPI-DWI is susceptible to geometric distortions. Half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE)-DWI may be an alternative. This prospective pilot study evaluates the potential predictive value of EPI- and HASTE-DWI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT (18F-FDG-PET-CT) early during CRT for locoregional outcome in HNSCC.
METHODS: Eight patients with advanced HNSCC (7 primary tumors and 25 nodal metastases) scheduled for CRT, underwent DW-MRI (using both EPI- and HASTE-DWI) and 18F-FDG-PET(-CT) pretreatment, early during treatment and three months after treatment. Median follow-up time was 38 months.
RESULTS: No local recurrences were detected during follow-up. Median Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)EPI-values in primary tumors increased from 77×10(-5) mm(2)/s pretreatment, to 113×10(-5) mm(2)/s during treatment (P=0.02), whereas ADCHASTE did not increase (74 and 74 mm(2)/s, respectively). Two regional recurrences were diagnosed. During treatment, ADCEPI tended to be higher for patients with regional control [(117.3±12.1)×10(-5) mm(2)/s] than for patients with a recurrence [(98.0±4.2)×10(-5) mm(2)/s]. This difference was not seen with ADCHASTE. No correlations between ΔADCEPI and ΔSUV (Standardized Uptake Value) were found in the primary tumor or nodal metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: HASTE-DWI seems to be inadequate in early CRT response prediction, compared to EPI-DWI which has potential to predict locoregional outcome. EPI-DWI and 18F-FDG-PET-CT potentially provide independent information in the early response to treatment, since no correlations were found between ΔADCEPI and ΔSUV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy (CRT); diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI); head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); positron emission tomography (PET); treatment response

Year:  2014        PMID: 25202659      PMCID: PMC4137183          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.07.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  31 in total

1.  Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  J P Pignon; J Bourhis; C Domenge; L Designé
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Roland Bammer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  PET-CT for response assessment and treatment adaptation in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Johan Bussink; Carla M L van Herpen; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Early FDG PET at 10 or 20 Gy under chemoradiotherapy is prognostic for locoregional control and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Maria Hentschel; Steffen Appold; Andreas Schreiber; Nasreddin Abolmaali; Andrij Abramyuk; Wolfgang Dörr; Joerg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann; Klaus Zöphel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Can "early" and "late"18F-FDG PET-CT be used as prognostic factors for the clinical outcome of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy?

Authors:  Paola Castaldi; Vittoria Rufini; Francesco Bussu; Francesco Miccichè; Nicola Dinapoli; Rosa Autorino; Mariaelena Lago; Eugenio De Corso; Giovanni Almadori; Jacopo Galli; Gaetano Paludetti; Alessandro Giordano; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Functional imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: correlation of PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Julia Fruehwald-Pallamar; Christian Czerny; Marius E Mayerhoefer; Benjamin S Halpern; Christina Eder-Czembirek; Markus Brunner; Matthias Schuetz; Michael Weber; Laura Fruehwald; Andreas M Herneth
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  FDG PET studies during treatment: prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eva Brun; Elisabeth Kjellén; Jan Tennvall; Tomas Ohlsson; Anders Sandell; Roland Perfekt; Roland Perfekt; Johan Wennerberg; Sven Erik Strand
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

Authors:  Sungheon Kim; Laurie Loevner; Harry Quon; Eric Sherman; Gregory Weinstein; Alex Kilger; Harish Poptani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an imaging treatment response biomarker to chemoradiotherapy in a mouse model of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Kuei C Lee; Bradford A Moffat; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Diffusion weighted MRI in head-and-neck cancer: geometrical accuracy.

Authors:  Tim Schakel; Johannes M Hoogduin; Chris H J Terhaard; Marielle E P Philippens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  11 in total

1.  Novel imaging biomarkers of response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Sylvain Favelier; Louis Estivalet; Pierre Pottecher; Romaric Loffroy
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  The emerging potential of magnetic resonance imaging in personalizing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: an oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  Kee H Wong; Rafal Panek; Shreerang A Bhide; Christopher M Nutting; Kevin J Harrington; Katie L Newbold
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Uveal melanoma: quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the response assessment after proton-beam therapy, long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Pietro Valerio Foti; Antonio Longo; Michele Reibaldi; Andrea Russo; Giuseppe Privitera; Corrado Spatola; Luigi Raffaele; Vincenzo Salamone; Renato Farina; Stefano Palmucci; Andrea Musumeci; Rosario Caltabiano; Marco Ragusa; Cesare Mariotti; Teresio Avitabile; Pietro Milone; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Assessment of serial multi-parametric functional MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging and R2*) with (18)F-FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Myo Min; Mark T Lee; Peter Lin; Lois Holloway; Dj Wijesekera; Dinesh Gooneratne; Robba Rai; Wei Xuan; Allan Fowler; Dion Forstner; Gary Liney
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Noninvasive Imaging of Cycling Hypoxia in Head and Neck Cancer Using Intrinsic Susceptibility MRI.

Authors:  Rafal Panek; Liam Welsh; Lauren C J Baker; Maria A Schmidt; Kee H Wong; Angela M Riddell; Dow-Mu Koh; Alex Dunlop; Dualta Mcquaid; James A d'Arcy; Shreerang A Bhide; Kevin J Harrington; Christopher M Nutting; Georgina Hopkinson; Cheryl Richardson; Carol Box; Suzanne A Eccles; Martin O Leach; Simon P Robinson; Kate L Newbold
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Biological Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Petra J van Houdt; Yingli Yang; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Tim Schakel; Boris Peltenburg; Jan-Willem Dankbaar; Carlos E Cardenas; Michalis Aristophanous; Chris H J Terhaard; Johannes M Hoogduin; Marielle E P Philippens
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-30

8.  The ability of post-chemoradiotherapy DWI ADCmean and 18F-FDG SUVmax to predict treatment outcomes in head and neck cancer: impact of human papilloma virus oropharyngeal cancer status.

Authors:  S Connor; C Sit; M Anjari; M Lei; T Guerrero-Urbano; T Szyszko; G Cook; P Bassett; V Goh
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Correlations between DW-MRI and 18 F-FDG PET/CT parameters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following definitive chemo-radiotherapy.

Authors:  Steve Connor; Cherry Sit; Mustafa Anjari; Teresa Szyszko; Joel Dunn; Irumee Pai; Gary Cook; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-07

10.  MRI in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy: what is the optimal delay to demonstrate maximal response?

Authors:  S E J Connor; C Burd; N Sivarasan; V Goh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.