Literature DB >> 25202537

Development of SSR markers for Encholirium horridum (Bromeliaceae) and transferability to other Pitcairnioideae.

Karina Vanessa Hmeljevski1, Maísa B Ciampi2, Cristina Baldauf3, Maurício Sedrez Dos Reis4, Rafaela Campostrini Forzza1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: We developed a set of primers for Encholirium horridum, a species closely associated with inselbergs of the Atlantic Forest, to assess genetic diversity, genetic structure, and gene flow between populations of this species. • METHODS AND
RESULTS: From an enriched genomic library, 10 primer pairs for polymorphic microsatellite regions were developed. The average number of alleles ranged from eight to 20, and the observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.000 to 1.000, and from 0.000 to 0.929, respectively, across the populations. •
CONCLUSIONS: These markers will be useful in evaluating genetic diversity, spatial genetic structure, analysis of gene flow by paternity, and characterization of mating system of E. horridum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlantic Forest; Bromeliaceae; Encholirium horridum; cross-amplification; inselberg; microsatellites

Year:  2013        PMID: 25202537      PMCID: PMC4105294          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1200445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Encholirium Mart. ex Schult. & Schult. f., together with Deuterocohnia Mez, Dyckia Schult. & Schult. f., Fosterella L. B. Sm., and Pitcairnia L’Hér., belongs to Bromeliaceae, subfamily Pitcairnioideae (Givnish et al., 2011). Encholirium is an exclusively Brazilian genus, with a distribution closely associated with inselbergs, in caatinga, cerrado, and Atlantic Forest phytogeographic domains. Of the 27 species described in this genus, only E. horridum L. B. Sm. and E. gracile L. B. Sm. are endemic to the Atlantic Forest (Forzza et al., 2013). Encholirium horridum has large populations distributed mainly in Espírito Santo State, extending to southern Bahia, eastern Minas Gerais, and northern Rio de Janeiro (Forzza et al., 2013). In 2008, the species was indicated as Data Deficient in the Official List of the Endangered Species of the Brazilian Flora (Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 2008). Inselbergs are isolated rock outcrops that can be considered terrestrial islands (Porembski and Barthlott, 2000), where the species usually exhibit spatial isolation and restricted gene flow (Barbará et al., 2008; Boisselier-Dubayle et al., 2010). These features may allow E. horridum populations from these habitats to evolve separately, favoring long-term processes of speciation. To understand possible genetic patterns of these particular habitats, microsatellite markers were developed to assess genetic diversity, genetic structure, and gene flow between populations of E. horridum from different inselbergs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A microsatellite-enriched library was constructed according to the method described by Billotte et al. (1999). For this purpose, genomic DNA from fresh leaves of an individual of E. horridum (Appendix 1) was extracted following Doyle and Doyle (1990). The DNA sample was digested with the RsaI restriction enzyme (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA), and the fragments were then linked to RsaI adapters. The library was enriched for dinucleotide sequences, using biotinylated (CT)8 and (GT)8 bound to Streptavidin MagneSphere Paramagnetic Particles (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, Wisconsin, USA). Enriched fragments were amplified in 100-μL final volume containing 20 μL of selected fragments, 1× Taq buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 4 pmol of primer Rsa21, and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase. A PTC-100 thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) was used for PCR with the following program: 95°C for 1 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 40 s, 60°C for 1 min, extension of 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension of 72°C for 5 min. The amplicons were cloned into a pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation) and transformed into Escherichia coli XL1-Blue competent cells. Positive clones were selected by the expression of β-galactosidase gene and sequenced in an automated ABI 377 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) using T7 and SP6 primers and the BigDye Terminator version 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Chromatograms were assembled and edited using SEQUENCHER 4.9 (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). Microsatellites were identified using the Simple Sequence Repeat Identification Tool (SSRIT; Temnykh et al., 2001). Of the 96 clones sequenced, 34 contained simple sequence repeat (SSR) motifs. It was not possible to design suitable primers harboring SSR regions for four of these clones, because these regions were either at the beginning or end of the sequences. Primer pairs were designed using Primer3Plus software (Untergasser et al., 2007). Evaluation of 30 primer pairs was performed by PCR in a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems), in 10-μL final volume containing 10 ng of template DNA, 1× Taq buffer (Bioline, Tauton, Massachusetts, USA), 2.0 mM MgCl2 (Bioline), 100 μM dNTPs (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, Maryland, USA), 2 pmol of each forward and reverse primer, and 0.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Bioline). The following program was used: 95°C for 3 min, followed by a first step consisting of 10 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, at the specific annealing temperature (Ta; Table 1) for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s, and a second step consisting of 20 cycles of denaturation at 90°C for 30 s, at the Ta (Table 1) for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 60 min. Eight samples from four populations located at the outermost geographic boundaries of species distribution were used to evaluate amplification success and loci polymorphism, respectively, on 1.5% and 3.0% agarose gels stained with GelRed (Biotium, Hayward, California, USA). Those loci with detected polymorphism were reamplified using forward primers labeled with fluorescence (FAM, NED, VIC, PET; Applied Biosystems; Table 1) and were resolved in an ABI 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using GSLIZ600 as the size standard (Applied Biosystems). Loci amplifications were made in single PCRs and were then multiplexed for fragment analysis. Fragment size and allele identification were determined using GeneMapper version 4.1 software (Applied Biosystems). For polymorphism evaluation, we used 89 individuals from 11 populations located along the species distribution (Table 2). These samples were dried in silica gel, and the genomic DNA was extracted using a NucleoSpin Plant II Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Genetic diversity parameters were estimated using FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 (Goudet, 2002). Out of the 30 microsatellite loci isolated, 18 were successfully amplified by PCR, of which 10 were polymorphic in the tested samples (Table 1). The number of alleles for the polymorphic loci ranged from eight to 20, with an average of 14.7. The observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.000 to 1.000, and from 0.000 to 0.929, respectively, across the populations, with an average of 0.345 and 0.433 (Table 2).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Encholirium horridum.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Fluorescent dyeRepeat motifNo. of allelesAllele size (bp)Ta (°C)GenBank accession no.
Eh1G03F: TTGTCGTTGTGACCTTCGTT6FAM(TG)1015213–25758JX183384
R: CTGTCTGCTTTTTGTTCCAGTG
Eh2A07F: ACTACTGCCCGGACTACCAA6FAM(GA)16N(AG)918215–25960JX183385
R: GGCATGTTAGGGTCCTTCAA
Eh2A08F: CTCCTTCAATTCACCCTTCGVIC(CA)6(CT)88105–12360JX183386
R: GTAGATCCAAACCGCATCG
Eh2A11F: AAAGTTGCCACCATGCAGNED(GA)161683–11559JX183387
R: GGGACATGTTGGTGATCTTG
Eh2B09F: GCAGTTAGGCCCATACCAAGVIC(GA)1715162–19059JX183388
R: TACAGAGAAGGCGATGTCCA
Eh2C03F: CGCATGAAAGGAGTAGGATGPET(GT)2020245–28358JX183389
R: AGCACTCACAAAACGGAGAG
Eh2E01F: GCACTCTAAAGGCGACCACVIC(TCT)5NN(TC)1920185–24860JX183390
R: CGATCATCTGCTCCTCCTC
Eh2E02F: ATGCACCAAAAGGGACCANED(TG)109241–26158JX183391
R: TCGATTGTGACTCGACCAAC
Eh2E11F: GGCTTTTGAGGGTGAAGGNED(GA)119179–19558JX183393
R: GGAGAGAGAAGAGAGAGGGAGA
Eh2G07F: GATGAACTCCAGTGCCTTCCPET(AG)2017162–20256JX183394
R: CCACCCTTATTGCTCTCACC

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

Table 2.

Results for primer screening of polymorphic loci in samples from 11 populations of Encholirium horridum.

Guaratinga (n = 8)Carlos Chagas (n = 8)Ecoporanga (n = 8)Água Doce do Norte (n = 8)Vila Pavão (n = 9)Pancas (n = 8)
LocusAHoHeAHoHeAHoHeAHoHeAHoHeAHoHe
Eh1G0320.3750.32180.8750.85710.0000.00050.3760.54540.3340.65330.6250.589
Eh2A0710.0000.00040.1250.67920.1250.33950.8760.81360.6660.83360.7490.830
Eh2A0810.0000.00020.0000.42910.0000.00030.5000.54540.2860.67940.0000.750
Eh2A1120.1250.12540.5010.43870.6670.68850.9990.821
Eh2B0920.3750.46460.7140.86920.2500.23250.5000.68371.0000.86840.7500.750
Eh2C0320.2500.58370.8570.88120.1250.48260.1430.92960.4280.76270.8330.883
Eh2E0120.0000.00020.1250.12510.0000.00030.2500.50970.4450.87550.7150.798
Eh2E0210.0000.00070.7500.87510.0000.00030.0000.80050.5000.75040.4290.738
Eh2E1110.0000.00050.7510.77710.0000.00050.7500.79550.6260.79520.2500.411
Eh2G0710.0000.00070.3750.91120.1250.12560.7500.83980.8890.91070.7510.911

Note: — = unsuccessful amplification; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity.

Geographic coordinates of the populations: Guaratinga 16°36′S, 39°47′W; Carlos Chagas 17°52′S, 41°03′W; Ecoporanga 18°11′S, 40°40′W; Água Doce do Norte 18°34′S, 40°59′W; Vila Pavão 18°38′S, 40°35′W; Pancas 19°14′S, 40°58′W; Colatina 19°33′S, 40°32′W; Marliéria 19°42′S, 42°42′W; Mutum 19°56′S, 41°29′W; Vila Velha 20°19′S, 40°19′W; Campos 21°20′S, 41°22′W.

Characteristics of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Encholirium horridum. Note: Ta = annealing temperature. Results for primer screening of polymorphic loci in samples from 11 populations of Encholirium horridum. Note: — = unsuccessful amplification; A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity. Geographic coordinates of the populations: Guaratinga 16°36′S, 39°47′W; Carlos Chagas 17°52′S, 41°03′W; Ecoporanga 18°11′S, 40°40′W; Água Doce do Norte 18°34′S, 40°59′W; Vila Pavão 18°38′S, 40°35′W; Pancas 19°14′S, 40°58′W; Colatina 19°33′S, 40°32′W; Marliéria 19°42′S, 42°42′W; Mutum 19°56′S, 41°29′W; Vila Velha 20°19′S, 40°19′W; Campos 21°20′S, 41°22′W. Cross-species amplification was evaluated in the five genera of subfamily Pitcairnioideae (Appendix 1). Genomic DNA from dried leaves in silica gel was extracted using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA). The PCR protocol used was the same as described above. In general, cross-amplification was high (Table 3). All of the 10 primer pairs amplified successfully in E. gracile, while for the other four species the success of amplification varied from 40% to 60%.
Table 3.

Transferability of 10 microsatellite markers developed for Encholirium horridum across species of Bromeliaceae, subfamily Pitcairnioideae.

SpeciesEh1G03Eh2A07Eh2A08Eh2A11Eh2B09Eh2C03Eh2E01Eh2E02Eh2E11Eh2G07
Deuterocohnia meziana**************
(56°C)(58°C)(58°C)(56°C)(58°C)(56°C)
Dyckia ibiramensis************
(56°C)(58°C)(58°C)(58°C)(60°C)
Encholirium gracile**************************
(58°C)(58°C)(58°C)(59°C)(62°C)(58°C)(60°C)(58°C)(58°C)(56°C)
Fosterella windischii*********
(56°C)(58°C)(60°C)(58°C)
Pitcairnia bradei*********
(56°C)(60°C)(59°C)(60°C)(58°C)

Note: *** = strong intensity amplification with single band visualized; ** = median intensity amplification with single band visualized; * = weak amplification; — = unsuccessful amplification.

Optimum annealing temperature is shown in parentheses.

Transferability of 10 microsatellite markers developed for Encholirium horridum across species of Bromeliaceae, subfamily Pitcairnioideae. Note: *** = strong intensity amplification with single band visualized; ** = median intensity amplification with single band visualized; * = weak amplification; — = unsuccessful amplification. Optimum annealing temperature is shown in parentheses.

CONCLUSIONS

The markers presented here will be useful in evaluating genetic diversity, spatial genetic structure, analysis of gene flow by paternity, and characterization of mating system of E. horridum. Results of cross-amplification indicate that this set of primers could be promising chiefly in studies with other species of Encholirium, but also with other Pitcairnioideae.
  4 in total

1.  Phylogeny, adaptive radiation, and historical biogeography in Bromeliaceae: insights from an eight-locus plastid phylogeny.

Authors:  Thomas J Givnish; Michael H J Barfuss; Benjamin Van Ee; Ricarda Riina; Katharina Schulte; Ralf Horres; Philip A Gonsiska; Rachel S Jabaily; Darren M Crayn; J Andrew C Smith; Klaus Winter; Gregory K Brown; Timothy M Evans; Bruce K Holst; Harry Luther; Walter Till; Georg Zizka; Paul E Berry; Kenneth J Sytsma
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential.

Authors:  S Temnykh; G DeClerck; A Lukashova; L Lipovich; S Cartinhour; S McCouch
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Within-population spatial genetic structure in four naturally fragmented species of a neotropical inselberg radiation, Alcantarea imperialis, A. geniculata, A. glaziouana and A. regina (Bromeliaceae).

Authors:  T Barbará; C Lexer; G Martinelli; S Mayo; M F Fay; M Heuertz
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3.

Authors:  Andreas Untergasser; Harm Nijveen; Xiangyu Rao; Ton Bisseling; René Geurts; Jack A M Leunissen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Do plant populations on distinct inselbergs talk to each other? A case study of genetic connectivity of a bromeliad species in an Ocbil landscape.

Authors:  Karina Vanessa Hmeljevski; Alison Gonçalves Nazareno; Marcelo Leandro Bueno; Maurício Sedrez Dos Reis; Rafaela Campostrini Forzza
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Carneiro Vieira; Luciane Santini; Augusto Lima Diniz; Carla de Freitas Munhoz
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.771

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.