| Literature DB >> 25202533 |
Prattana Phuekvilai1, Kirsten Wolff1.
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Microsatellite markers in the genus Tilia were developed to investigate the genetic variation in T. platyphyllos and its relationship with T. cordata. • METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Malvaceae; Tilia platyphyllos; hybridization; microsatellite marker; population structure
Year: 2013 PMID: 25202533 PMCID: PMC4105290 DOI: 10.3732/apps.1200386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Plant Sci ISSN: 2168-0450 Impact factor: 1.936
Characterization of 15 microsatellite markers developed in the genus Tilia.
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat motif | Size (bp) | Primer conc. (mM) | Fluorescent dye | Multiplex sets | GenBank accession no. |
| Tc4 | F: ATTTTAGAATGCCAACCTGCTAAG | T6(GT)12 | 224 | 0.2 | HEX | B | JQ289157 |
| R: TATTGAAGTCCATTTCCAATTGTC | |||||||
| Tc5 | F: TTTTCATACATTTAGAGACTTTTAGCA | (AG)12 | 150 | 0.2 | FAM | D | JQ289158 |
| R: TGCATGATTTGTATGTTTAGGG | |||||||
| Tc6 | F: CCATATCTTCTGCCAGTTTTCC | (AG)12 | 143 | 0.2 | HEX | A | JQ289159 |
| R: GGACTAATTTCTTCCTTTTATTAGGC | |||||||
| Tc7 | F: TTTACTTTTGCCAGTTGTGAGG | (GA)13 | 234 | 0.1 | FAM | D | JQ289160 |
| R: CACCTAGAATGCCTCCTATTCG | |||||||
| Tc8 | F: CGAAGAAACTGTCAAAACAACG | (GA)13 | 160 | 0.1 | HEX | B | JQ289161 |
| R: AGCTGGGTTTTAGAGGATAGGG | |||||||
| Tc11 | F: AGCTATGAAAGAACTATCAAGAGAAAG | (AG)13 | 146 | 0.1 | NED | C | JQ289162 |
| R: CCCCAAGACATTGCAGTAGAAC | |||||||
| Tc31 | F: TTTGCAAAGACTACTCCAAGAATC | (GA)12 | 205 | 0.2 | FAM | B | JQ289164 |
| R: AAATCGATGGTCAAGAACTAAATC | |||||||
| Tc915 | F: ACATCGATTGTATTTCCCTTTAAC | (CT)16 | 165 | 0.2 | HEX | C | JQ289165 |
| R: GTTGTATTTTGCCCTTAACATTG | |||||||
| Tc918 | F: AACGGCTAATTACTCCTAGTTTCG | (AC)9(TC)2 | 240 | 0.2 | HEX | A | JQ289166 |
| R: TGTTCAGCTCACTACTACCTTTCAC | |||||||
| Tc920 | F: AAATGTCTTCAGAGTGACTAGATGG | (GA)2(GT)15(AG)4 | 232 | 0.1 | FAM | A | JQ289167 |
| R: TGCCTCATTATTCTCCTAATTCTC | |||||||
| Tc927 | F: AGTCCTCCTGTCAAATGCTG | (AG)10 | 157 | 0.1 | FAM | C | JQ289168 |
| R: ATCACACTCGTTTATGACATCTTG | |||||||
| Tc937 | F: AGCCAACCAACTTTTACAATACAG | (AG)13 | 162 | 0.1 | NED | A | JQ289169 |
| R: AGATAAAAGCACATAAATCGATGG | |||||||
| Tc943 | F: ATTTCATCTTTCTCTAAAGCCTTG | (CA)10 | 150 | 0.2 | FAM | B | JQ289170 |
| R: GGGAAAGCCTGTGTTAGTTTC | |||||||
| Tc951 | F: TGTTATGACCTCACTTATAACCAAGT | (CT)12 | 160 | 0.2 | NED | D | JQ289171 |
| R: GGGTGAGCTGACAATATAGAAGAG | |||||||
| Tc963 | F: CTAACCCCATTCTCTTTAATTCTG | (CT)11 | 238 | 0.2 | HEX | C | JQ289172 |
| R: GCTTTCATTTCAGTTTTCCTCTAC |
Size of the original fragment.
Fluorescent label on the forward primer.
Results of 15 microsatelite markers in two populations from France (Issole and Gorges de la Carança).
| Issole ( | Gorges de la Carança ( | |||||||
| Locus | HWE | HWE | ||||||
| Tc4 | 8 | 0.85 | 0.82 | ns | 11 | 0.70 | 0.85 | ** |
| Tc5 | 15 | 1.00 | 0.86 | ns | 10 | 0.90 | 0.82 | ns |
| Tc6 | 8 | 0.70 | 0.82 | ns | 7 | 0.75 | 0.76 | ns |
| Tc7 | 9 | 0.80 | 0.76 | ns | 7 | 0.85 | 0.79 | ns |
| Tc8 | 6 | 0.90 | 0.77 | ns | 8 | 0.80 | 0.80 | ns |
| Tc11 | 9 | 0.95 | 0.81 | ns | 8 | 0.65 | 0.73 | ns |
| Tc31 | 9 | 0.80 | 0.80 | ns | 9 | 0.90 | 0.80 | ns |
| Tc915 | 12 | 0.90 | 0.88 | ns | 12 | 0.75 | 0.87 | ns |
| Tc918 | 2 | 0.10 | 0.18 | * | 2 | 0.25 | 0.22 | ns |
| Tc920 | 9 | 0.65 | 0.59 | ns | 5 | 0.30 | 0.54 | ** |
| Tc927 | 14 | 0.85 | 0.90 | ns | 11 | 0.75 | 0.82 | ns |
| Tc937 | 10 | 0.85 | 0.81 | ns | 9 | 0.95 | 0.80 | ns |
| Tc943 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Monomorphic | 2 | 0.30 | 0.26 | ns |
| Tc951 | 8 | 0.60 | 0.64 | ns | 6 | 0.75 | 0.71 | ns |
| Tc963 | 14 | 0.85 | 0.87 | * | 15 | 0.90 | 0.88 | ns |
Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; N = sample size.
ns = nonsignificant departure from HWE; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Amplification of 15 microsatellite loci across 23 species in the genus Tilia.
| Species | Tc4 | Tc5 | Tc6 | Tc7 | Tc8 | Tc11 | Tc31 | Tc915 | Tc918 | Tc920 | Tc927 | Tc937 | Tc943 | Tc951 | Tc963 |
| ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | – | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| + | + | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | – | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | + | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | – | + | ++ | + | + | + | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | ++ | ++ | – | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | |
| + | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | + | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| + | + | ++ | ++ | + | + | ++ | ++ | – | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | ++ | – | + | ++ | + | ++ | + | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | + | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | |
| ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | – | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
Note: – = failed amplification; + = successful amplification with one allele; ++ = successful amplification with more than one allele.
Numbers in parentheses show number of samples tested.