Literature DB >> 25202514

Development of microsatellite markers in the hexaploid aquatic macrophyte, Myriophyllum spicatum (Haloragaceae).

Zhi-Gang Wu1, Dan Yu1, Xin-Wei Xu1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: We developed microsatellite primers to investigate genetic diversity and population genetic structure of the cosmopolitan submerged plant Myriophyllum spicatum. • METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty microsatellite loci were identified in M. spicatum using the microsatellite-enriched library method. The numbers of alleles per locus ranged from one to 13, and the expected heterozygosity varied from 0 to 0.873 with a mean of 0.504 in two Chinese populations of M. spicatum. All of the loci were also found to be amplifiable in the related species M. verticillatum and M. sibiricum. •
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that these markers will be significant for studies of population genetic structure and evolutionary history of M. spicatum as well as some of its related species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haloragaceae; Myriophyllum spicatum; microsatellite markers; polyploid; population genetic structure

Year:  2013        PMID: 25202514      PMCID: PMC4105368          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1200230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) is a perennial submerged macrophyte native to Europe, Asia, and northern Africa (Couch and Nelson, 1985). In North America, M. spicatum has been recognized as a noxious invasive plant mainly due to the rapid spread of this species (Reed, 1977; Jacono and Richerson, 2003). Myriophyllum spicatum is hexaploid, and the chromosome number (2n = 6x = 42) was reported for plants from Europe and North America (Löve, 1961; Aiken et al., 1979), whereas there was no report about the polyploid types of M. spicatum because its chromosomes were found to be too small to disclose morphological characteristics for karyotype analysis (Aiken, 1981). There have been numerous studies concerned with the ecology and management of M. spicatum, and only a few studies have revealed DNA sequence variation among different individuals (e.g., Moody and Les, 2007). No investigation has been carried out to examine genetic variation in M. spicatum at the population level; the evolutionary processes of this species are more likely distinctive due to its occurrence in exclusively aquatic habitats (Barrett et al., 1993). Therefore, we isolated 20 microsatellite markers from M. spicatum for use in investigations of genetic variation, population genetic structure, and evolutionary history of this cosmopolitan submerged species.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the dried leaves of one individual of M. spicatum sampled from the Tai Lake population (Appendix 1) using the DNAsecure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). A microsatellite-enriched library was developed following the protocol of Glenn and Schable (2005). The genomic DNA was digested into ∼500-bp fragments with RsaI and XmnI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) and ligated to the SuperSNX24 adapters (F: 5′-GTTTAAGGCCTAGCTAGCAGAATC-3′, R: 5′-pGATTCTGCTAGCTAGGCCTTAAACAAA-3′). The digestion-ligation mixture was hybridized with 3′ biotinylated oligo probes (AC)18/(AG)18/(ATG)12 and captured by Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin (Invitrogen, Dynal AS, Oslo, Norway) for enrichment of simple sequence repeat (SSR) sequences. The products were recovered by PCR amplification with the SuperSNX24 forward primer, ligated into the pEASY-T1 Simple Cloning Vector (Transgen, Beijing, China), and then transformed into competent cells of E. coli. Eighty-three positive clones were selected and sequenced with the ABI 3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Forty-three clones, or approximately 50% of the positive clones, contained SSRs.
Appendix 1.

Geographic location and voucher information of Myriophyllum populations in this study. All voucher specimens are deposited at the Wuhan University Herbarium (WH).

SpeciesPopulationLocationGeographic coordinatesVoucher no.
M. spicatumFYFuyang, Zhejiang29°59′40″N, 119°41′40″EXu et al., 1051
M. spicatumTJTongjiang, Heilongjiang47°30′06″N, 133°05′10″EXu et al., 201
M. spicatumBMBomi, Tibet29°54′58″N, 95°38′05″EXu et al., 2464
M. spicatumTai LakeSuzhou, Jiangsu31°13′22″N, 120°26′46″EXu et al., 1017
M. spicatumLiangzi LakeEzhou, Hubei30°15′30″N, 114°33′30″EXu et al., 2616
M. spicatumBosten LakeBohu, Xinjiang41°54′24″N, 86°43′53″EXu et al., 2570
M. verticillatumXinkai LakeMishan, Heilongjiang45°20′43″N, 132°22′16″EXu et al., 137
M. sibiricumDQDeqin, Yunnan28°30′22″N, 98°54′41″EXu et al., 2450
PCR primers were designed for all 43 sequences using the program Primer Premier 5.0 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, California, USA) and evaluated in 20 individuals from six different populations of M. spicatum (Appendix 1). Twenty pairs of primers (Table 1) that showed single and clear bands were chosen and labeled with the fluorescent dyes 6-FAM, HEX, or ROX. Characterization of the SSR loci was estimated in two distant populations in China (Bosten Lake population and Liangzi Lake population; Appendix 1), each with 20 individuals. PCR amplifications were performed in 15 μL total volume containing ∼50 ng genomic DNA, 0.33 μM of each primer, and 1× PCR Mix (Tiangen Biotech). Microsatellites were amplified under the following conditions: 5 min initial denaturation at 94°C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 52–60°C (Table 1), and 1 min at 72°C; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed on the ABI 3730XL and genotyping was performed using GeneMapper version 4.0 software (Applied Biosystems).
Table 1.

Characteristics of 20 microsatellite markers developed in Myriophyllum spicatum.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifSize range (bp)Ta (°C)Fluorescent dyeaGenBank accession no.
Myrsp1F: GTCAAAGCAGCCACTCGG(TCA)3(TCAGCA)2(GCA)3179–184596-FAMJX000192
R: GGCAACAATGCAGCTAACC
Myrsp2F: TTCTACCGCGAAAGACT(AC)4(TC)10340–358526-FAMJX000193
R: CCATCATTCCTATCAACC
Myrsp3F: CACCACTCCTAAACTCACCCTC(TA)7(TG)18439–457606-FAMJX000194
R: GCTCATCGCCAACTCCTG
Myrsp4F: ACTGGCTAATGATATGCTGA(TC)17(AC)9253–28454ROXJX000195
R: TCTTTCCACGCCTCTTC
Myrsp5F: GGGAAGCCGACAAGAAA(TC)11351–36055ROXJX000196
R: CGAAGACGGAGTTATCAAG
Myrsp6F: TAACAAACCGTACATTACAAGC(TC)17145–15559ROXJX000197
R: TTTCTCTGGGAGCCATAAC
Myrsp7F: AGGACGGAGATAGGATGG(TGA)10(TC)3(TG)3297–307606-FAMJX000198
R: GAGGGCAAAGGGATGAC
Myrsp8F: GCACCATTAGGAGGAGAAC(CA)9282–28758HEXJX000199
R: CTGCCGAAGATGAAACG
Myrsp9F: TCCCCATCTGGTTCGTAT(ATC)5(TTCATC)2(TTC)2224–23358HEXJX000200
R: GGAAGGTAGCGGAGTGC
Myrsp10F: CTAATCCCAGTCCACGG(TCA)4(GCA)5268–27359HEXJX000201
R: GCTGAAATTGAAGCCTCT
Myrsp11F: ATTCCAATCCCACAGTCT(GAA)3(TGC)6(TGA)3267–26955ROXJX000202
R: TCGGCTCATTAGTCCC
Myrsp12F: CGCTTCACAAGTATTCTG(TC)18(AC)10349–38452HEXJX000203
R: TTCATGGTAGCCGTCA
Myrsp13F: GCTTCCATTGCGAAACTT(GCA)4(TCA)4(GCA)3450–45555ROXJX000204
R: CCCAAACACCACCTCATT
Myrsp14F: TTCCCATCCTTCTCCTG(TA)2(TG)8(TA)8(GA)4301–31358ROXJX000205
R: CCAAGTAAGTGTCCCAAAC
Myrsp15F: TCTTTCCACGCCTCTTC(TG)7(AG)9247–282566-FAMJX000206
R: ACTGGCTAATGATATGCTGA
Myrsp16F: GGCTGCCCTATGCTAA(TG)2(CA)8(TA)6(GA)6339–35454ROXJX000207
R: ATCCCACTGAAGTCAAACT
Myrsp17F: CGGAAATACAGTCCAAGGT(GT)2(TG)932058HEXJX000208
R: CATGAGACACTAGTAAAGATCGA
Myrsp18F: GACGCCAAATCCAACT(TCA)11331–339586-FAMJX000209
R: AATGATGTGCCTATACTGAA
Myrsp19F: CTCACCGCCTCGTTAAA(TC)8138–14854HEXJX000210
R: CGTGTTCATTCCATCATTG
Myrsp20F: ACCTCTTCTTCCTGTCTACC(AG)13104576-FAMJX000211
R: ACTAAGCCACATCTGTCTGA

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

All forward primers were labeled with fluorescent dyes except Myrsp4, Myrsp6, and Myrsp19, in which the labels are on the reverse primers.

Characteristics of 20 microsatellite markers developed in Myriophyllum spicatum. Note: Ta = annealing temperature. All forward primers were labeled with fluorescent dyes except Myrsp4, Myrsp6, and Myrsp19, in which the labels are on the reverse primers. Because M. spicatum is hexaploid, up to six alleles per locus should be expressed in one single plant. Of all 20 loci, however, most showed no more than four alleles per individual (Table 2); no reliable explanation could be provided for this considering that the inheritance pattern of M. spicatum was ambiguous. The allele dosage of partial heterozygotes is difficult to identify, thus the presence/absence of the peaks was used to calculate the frequencies for Nei’s expected heterozygosity. The locus Myrsp12 showed the highest polymorphism with 13 alleles in the Liangzi Lake population, whereas Myrsp17 and Myrsp20 were monomorphic in both populations. The expected heterozygosity ranged from 0 to 0.873 with a mean of 0.407 and 0.601 in the two populations, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2.

Results of initial primer screening in two populations of Myriophyllum spicatum.

Bosten LakeLiangzi Lake
LocusAmAHeAHe
Myrsp1340.66130.591
Myrsp2330.59490.847
Myrsp321050.417
Myrsp4420.496100.782
Myrsp5540.70380.817
Myrsp6350.56840.681
Myrsp721050.687
Myrsp8220.49620.496
Myrsp931080.716
Myrsp10240.54340.543
Myrsp1121020.466
Myrsp12630.667130.873
Myrsp13320.49630.631
Myrsp14440.543100.773
Myrsp15440.543100.784
Myrsp16430.66540.689
Myrsp1711010
Myrsp18430.66540.727
Myrsp19220.49620.496
Myrsp2011010
Mean32.550.4075.40.601

Note: A = number of alleles; Am = maximum allele number per individual; He = expected heterozygosity.

Results of initial primer screening in two populations of Myriophyllum spicatum. Note: A = number of alleles; Am = maximum allele number per individual; He = expected heterozygosity. Cross-species amplification was conducted in M. verticillatum L. (10 individuals, Appendix 1) and M. sibiricum Kom. (20 individuals, Appendix 1), both of which are in the same section of Myriophyllum as M. spicatum (Moody and Les, 2010). All of the loci were amplified successfully in these two related species.

CONCLUSIONS

The polymorphism observed for the microsatellite loci we isolated is high enough to support genetic studies in M. spicatum. Cross-species amplification also reveals that these markers are suitable to use in two related species. We conclude that these primers will facilitate the investigation of genetic diversity, population structure, and evolutionary history of M. spicatum as well as some of its related species.
  1 in total

1.  Isolating microsatellite DNA loci.

Authors:  Travis C Glenn; Nancy A Schable
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.600

  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Genetic and geographical structure of boreal plants in their southern range: phylogeography of Hippuris vulgaris in China.

Authors:  Qixiang Lu; Jinning Zhu; Dan Yu; Xinwei Xu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Development of EST-derived microsatellite markers in the aquatic macrophyte Ranunculus bungei (Ranunculaceae).

Authors:  Zhigang Wu; Jinwei Wu; Yalin Wang; Hongwei Hou
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Influence of geography and environment on patterns of genetic differentiation in a widespread submerged macrophyte, Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L., Haloragaceae).

Authors:  Zhigang Wu; Dan Yu; Xing Li; Xinwei Xu
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Great influence of geographic isolation on the genetic differentiation of Myriophyllum spicatum under a steep environmental gradient.

Authors:  Zhigang Wu; Dan Yu; Zhong Wang; Xing Li; Xinwei Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Carneiro Vieira; Luciane Santini; Augusto Lima Diniz; Carla de Freitas Munhoz
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Bridging population genetics and the metacommunity perspective to unravel the biogeographic processes shaping genetic differentiation of Myriophyllum alterniflorum DC.

Authors:  Jorge García-Girón; Pedro García; Margarita Fernández-Aláez; Eloy Bécares; Camino Fernández-Aláez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.