| Literature DB >> 26494202 |
Zhigang Wu1, Dan Yu1, Zhong Wang1, Xing Li1, Xinwei Xu1.
Abstract
Understanding how natural processes affect population genetic structures is an important issue in evolutionary biology. One effective method is to assess the relative importance of environmental and geographical factors in the genetic structure of populations. In this study, we examined the spatial genetic variation of thirteen Myriophyllum spicatum populations from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) and adjacent highlands (Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, YGP) by using microsatellite loci and environmental and geographical factors. Bioclim layers, hydrological properties and elevation were considered as environmental variables and reduced by principal component analysis. The genetic isolation by geographic distance (IBD) was tested by Mantel tests and the relative importance of environmental variables on population genetic differentiation was determined by a partial Mantel test and multiple matrix regression with randomization (MMRR). Two genetic clusters corresponding to the QTP and YGP were identified. Both tests and MMRR revealed a significant and strong correlation between genetic divergence and geographic isolation under the influence of environmental heterogeneity at the overall and finer spatial scales. Our findings suggested the dominant role of geography on the evolution of M. spicatum under a steep environmental gradient in the alpine landscape as a result of dispersal limitation and genetic drift.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26494202 PMCID: PMC4616052 DOI: 10.1038/srep15618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Geographic origins, sample sizes, number of genets, number of alleles (NA), number of effective alleles (NEA), Nei’s genotypic diversity index (D) and the value of the first axis of PCA to the environmental variables (PC1) for the 13 Myriophyllum spicatum populations studied.
| QTP | ||||||||||
| ZB | Zhongba, Xizang | 29.6957 | 84.1284 | 4569 | 14 | 2 | 33 | 32.27 | 0.264 | −2.46 |
| AR | Angren, Xizang | 29.2085 | 87.4154 | 4357 | 12 | 9 | 44 | 36.176 | 0.955 | −4.247 |
| DR | Dingri, Xizang | 28.5824 | 87.6523 | 4253 | 6 | 5 | 45 | 37.772 | 0.933 | −3.203 |
| SZ | Shenzha, Xizang | 30.7542 | 88.7873 | 4692 | 18 | 2 | 32 | 30.226 | 0.111 | −4.069 |
| RK | Rikaze, Xizang | 29.3245 | 89.4102 | 3787 | 18 | 11 | 45 | 37.702 | 0.882 | −3.616 |
| CM | Cuomai, Xizang | 28.7710 | 91.6686 | 4626 | 18 | 5 | 36 | 33.04 | 0.81 | −4.853 |
| GB | Gongbujiangda, Xizang | 29.8927 | 93.4645 | 3560 | 20 | 13 | 30 | 25.76 | 0.926 | −2.357 |
| LZ | Linzhi, Xizang | 29.6309 | 94.3825 | 2990 | 12 | 12 | 53 | 43.008 | 1 | −0.12 |
| YGP | ||||||||||
| YS | Yongsheng, Yunnan | 26.6237 | 100.6526 | 1520 | 20 | 8 | 43 | 40.166 | 0.805 | 4.713 |
| DL | Dali, Yunnan | 25.6708 | 100.2109 | 1954 | 19 | 18 | 73 | 50.596 | 0.994 | 5.495 |
| CJ | Chengjiang, Yunnan | 24.6323 | 102.8828 | 1735 | 20 | 17 | 75 | 49.504 | 0.984 | 5.793 |
| LB | Leibo, Sichuan | 28.4286 | 103.7854 | 1134 | 16 | 7 | 44 | 35.798 | 0.775 | 4.97 |
| WN | Weining, Guizhou | 26.8383 | 104.2645 | 2187 | 13 | 13 | 69 | 48.146 | 1 | 3.954 |
| Mean | 47.846 | 38.474 | 0.803 | |||||||
| Total | 206 | 122 | 136 | 34.692 | 0.987 | |||||
Pairwise Bruvo distance between 13 Myriophyllum spicatum populations.
| AR | 0.33 | |||||||||||
| DR | 0.414 | 0.31 | ||||||||||
| SZ | 0.374 | 0.413 | 0.445 | |||||||||
| RK | 0.318 | 0.407 | 0.414 | 0.34 | ||||||||
| CM | 0.467 | 0.479 | 0.454 | 0.351 | 0.376 | |||||||
| GB | 0.479 | 0.478 | 0.469 | 0.492 | 0.385 | 0.449 | ||||||
| LZ | 0.502 | 0.539 | 0.505 | 0.542 | 0.443 | 0.434 | 0.411 | |||||
| YS | 0.502 | 0.603 | 0.549 | 0.567 | 0.483 | 0.566 | 0.555 | 0.515 | ||||
| DL | 0.518 | 0.579 | 0.592 | 0.524 | 0.48 | 0.512 | 0.536 | 0.496 | 0.405 | |||
| CJ | 0.554 | 0.556 | 0.528 | 0.537 | 0.522 | 0.464 | 0.521 | 0.52 | 0.483 | 0.473 | ||
| LB | 0.411 | 0.494 | 0.533 | 0.37 | 0.375 | 0.414 | 0.523 | 0.484 | 0.515 | 0.455 | 0.53 | |
| WN | 0.499 | 0.522 | 0.546 | 0.544 | 0.49 | 0.508 | 0.481 | 0.488 | 0.538 | 0.496 | 0.466 | 0.501 |
Figure 1Thirteen sampling sites of Myriophyllum spicatum in the QTP and adjacent highlands mapped using ArcGIS.
Pie charts represent the probability of assignment to subclusters when K = 2, as identified by STRUCTURE based on microsatellite data. Population codes are shown on the side. The elevation range and main rivers are visualized.
Figure 2The bar plot depicts the STRUCTURE admixture coefficients of all genets when K = 2 (a), the genets of the QTP populations when K = 3 (b), and the genets of the YGP populations when K = 2 (c). A single vertical bar displays the membership coefficient of each individual, with sample site labeled.
Figure 3Scatterplots of Mantel tests: (a) IBD across the entire data set; (b) IBD in the populations of the QTP; (c) IBD in the populations of the YGP. The IBD slope is 0.111, 0.141 and 0.126 for entire region, the QTP and the YGP, respectively.
Partial Mantel tests of association between genetic distances and geographic distances, and the environmental dissimilarity of Myriophyllum spicatum populations in the QTP and YGP, and in two study regions respectively.
| QTP and YGP | G × Dist | Env | 0.330 | |
| G × Env | Dist | 0.077 | 0.554 | |
| QTP | G × Dist | Env | 0.556 | |
| G × Env | Dist | 0.044 | 0.849 | |
| YGP | G × Dist | Env | 0.528 | 0.100 |
| G × Env | Dist | 0.184 | 0.268 |
G, genetic distance (Bruvo distance); Dist, geographic distance; Env, environmental distance. Significant values were presented in bold.
Regression coefficient (β) and significance (p) of MMRR analysis on the association between genetic distance and geographic distance, and environmental dissimilarity of Myriophyllum spicatum populations in the QTP and YGP, and in two study regions respectively.
| QTP and YGP | Geographic distance | 0.490 | |
| Environmental dissimilarity | 0.108 | 0.559 | |
| QTP | Geographic distance | 0.619 | |
| Environmental dissimilarity | 0.041 | 0.831 | |
| YGP | Geographic distance | 0.536 | 0.186 |
| Environmental dissimilarity | 0.161 | 0.559 |
Significant values are presented in bold.