Literature DB >> 25202494

Isolation and characterization of novel EST-derived genic markers in Pisum sativum (Fabaceae).

Shalu Jain1, Kevin E McPhee1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Novel markers were developed for pea (Pisum sativum) from pea expressed sequence tags (ESTs) having significant homology to Medicago truncatula gene sequences to investigate genetic diversity, linkage mapping, and cross-species transferability. • METHODS AND
RESULTS: Seventy-seven EST-derived genic markers were developed through comparative mapping between M. truncatula and P. sativum in which 75 markers produced PCR products and 33 were polymorphic among 16 pea genotypes. •
CONCLUSIONS: The novel markers described here will be useful for future genetic studies of P. sativum; their amplification in lentil (Lens culinaris) demonstrates their potential for use in closely related species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative mapping; expressed sequence tags; lentil; marker-assisted selection; pea; synteny

Year:  2013        PMID: 25202494      PMCID: PMC4103456          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1300026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is an important grain legume grown in temperate regions of the world because its seeds are a cheap and rich source of protein and contribute to the nutritional quality of human and animal diets. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) for agronomic traits such as yield, quality, and tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses is not widely applied in pea due to unavailability of a reference pea genome and the limited number of molecular markers for tagging of agronomically important genes in pea improvement programs (Jain et al., 2012; Smykal et al., 2012). Pea expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbEST/dbEST_summary.html) are valuable tools for developing breeder-friendly markers from coding regions of genes and have been used in the past to develop a modest number of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in pea (Xu et al., 2012; Mishra et al., 2012; DeCaire et al., 2012; Zhuang et al., 2013). Genomic resources of the sequenced model legume Medicago truncatula Gaertn. (http://gbrowse.jcvi.org/cgi-bin/gbrowse/medicago/) also offer a wealth of information for developing EST-derived genic markers in closely related species using a comparative genomics approach (Smykal et al., 2012). Genic markers developed in this study using the conserved sequences between the two legumes are valuable because they can add density to gene-rich linkage maps of pea, establish macro- or microsynteny between M. truncatula and pea, and have higher chances of transferability between closely related species. This information can help in identifying markers that are tightly linked to the genes of interest or candidate gene/quantitative trait locus for agronomic traits. Investigation of conserved regions in different studies has provided strong evidence for sequence correlations between M. truncatula and pea (Choi et al., 2004a; Aubert et al., 2006; Bordat et al., 2011). This information can be used to develop genic markers based on sequence homology between the related species. Choi et al. (2004b) developed EST-based intron-targeted primers after aligning M. truncatula ESTs with the homologous genomic sequences of Arabidopsis (DC.) Heynh. and used them to construct a genetic map of M. truncatula. The basic assumption for this strategy is that introns or noncoding regions contain more DNA polymorphism than exons or coding regions (Brauner et al., 2002). A similar strategy—one that allows amplification of genomic DNA fragments covering two or more exons and bracketing polymorphic intron regions between those exons—was used in this study to develop pea EST-derived genic markers. Markers developed in this study are also available as cross-species markers within the legume family.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Primers were designed from pea EST sequences having significant similarity (score ≥100; E-value ≤e−50) using the BLASTn search with M. truncatula gene calls from the contig assembly (Mt3.0) of M. truncatula. Approximately 1200 M. truncatula gene calls were searched for presence of introns. One or more introns were present in 510 of the 1200 M. truncatula gene calls and were aligned with the available pea ESTs (n = 18576) in the database. Seventy-seven primers were designed from the pea ESTs having well-conserved sequences with M. truncatula gene calls spanning one or more introns. Primers were designed by importing sequences into Primer-BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) and selecting primers 18–24 bp long with annealing temperatures of 55–65°C. New primers were designed to amplify fragments from 150 to 1200 bp. Genomic DNA of 16 pea genotypes including widely grown cultivars and plant introduction lines (i.e., Shawnee, Melrose, Medora, Lifter, Radley, PI 179449, Green Arrow, Frolic, A778-26-6, Sparkle, JI73, Bohatyr, ICI12043, PI 240515, PI 103709, PI 169603) was extracted from leaf tissue using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction protocol (Rogers and Bendich, 1985). PCR amplifications were performed in 25-μL reaction mixtures with 50 ng of template DNA, 0.2 μM of each forward and reverse primers, 200 μM dNTPs, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1× PCR buffer, and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase in a Veriti 96-Well Fast Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). The PCR profile included an initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 51–62°C for 50 s (according to the primer’s annealing temperature), 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Length polymorphism was viewed with ethidium bromide in 8% polyacrylamide gels run in a Mega-Gel high-throughput electrophoresis system for 5 h at 250 V (C.B.S. Scientific, San Diego, California, USA). If length polymorphism was not detected, PCR products were digested with restriction enzymes (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) to generate cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers and separated on 2% agarose to detect polymorphism. Amplified fragments were run with a 25/100-bp DNA ladder (Bioneer, Alameda, California, USA) and analyzed for fragment size using AlphaView Stand Alone analysis software version 3.4 (ProteinSimple, Santa Clara, California, USA). Each EST-derived genic marker was considered polymorphic when the PCR band pattern of one of the 16 pea genotypes was different from the others with regard to size or CAPS polymorphism (Appendix S1). Different polymorphic fragments for a particular locus were considered as different alleles. Seventy-five primer pairs resulted in successful PCR amplification in which 66% (42 primer pairs) were monomorphic and 44% (33 primer pairs) were polymorphic among the 16 pea genotypes, which are parents of several pea mapping populations being used to map different disease resistance loci. The segregation analysis using these polymorphic markers has been conducted in a large number of mapping populations developed from crossing of these genotypes as parents (data not shown). All the primers generated a clear fragment pattern, with PCR products ranging in size from 150 to 1200 bp with two to three alleles per marker. Table 1 summarizes the forward and reverse primer sequence, size range of the original fragment (bp), annealing temperature, M. truncatula gene call, and the equivalent pea EST GenBank accession number. These EST-derived genic markers are codominant, highly reproducible, and easy to score. PCR products among the 16 pea genotypes were analyzed for allele number, observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He) or gene diversity, and polymorphic information content (PIC) using PowerMarker version 3.25 (Liu and Muse, 2005) (Table 2). Ho and He values ranged from 0.0000 to 0.0625 and from 0.0377 to 0.6391, respectively. The PIC ranged from 0.0370 to 0.5659 with an average of 0.2708. Twenty-four EST-derived genic markers were tested in two lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) genotypes, and PCR amplification of 12 markers determined the transferability of these markers in related genera (Appendix S2). This lends support from other studies on transferability of cross-species markers based on conserved sequences (Phan et al., 2006). Cross-species transferability of EST-derived genic markers is due to the conserved nature of primers picked up from coding sequences. More detailed polymorphism analysis and linkage analysis using mapping populations will establish connections between the genetic and genomic information of the closely related species.
Table 1.

Specific primer sequences and characteristics of 75 EST-derived genic markers developed in Pisum sativum.

LocusPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Product size (bp)Ta (°C)M. truncatula gene call numberPea EST
Mt5_001*F:AGGAAAATCCAGAAGTGTGCTCCCC510–54062Medtr5g008110.1gb|EX568712.1|
R:GCAAGAACATTGGCGCTTCCCC
Mt5_002F:GGCAGAGACGGTTGGAAAGCC310–120060Medtr5g007580.1gb|CD860473.1|
R:GAGGGAGCAAAAGTGGAGCTATCGG
Mt5_003*F:GTGGATGCCATGTTGGGAAGGT35062Medtr5g011160.1gb|EX569130.1|
R:CCTAACATGTCCTCAAACACCAGCA
Mt5_004*F:TGTTCACTGTCACATTAGTGGAGGC810–120062Medtr5g011250.2gb|CD861142.1|
R:TTGGGGCAGTTTCAAATCAGAGTGGG
Mt5_005*F:TGGACCGAATGAGCGAGCCG30062Medtr5g012870.1gb|GH720478.1|
R:CCAATTACTTGGCTCCATCGTCGC
Mt5_006*F:CAAGTTGAAGTGTGGTTTCAGAATCGG38062Medtr5g013110.1gb|FG530896.1|
R:GAACCACCACCTTCTGCCACGC
Mt5_007F:AATCTGAAACTGACAGTGAAGAGTCGG50558Medtr5g013750.2gb|FG530508.1|
R:ACCATAAAGCATCTCTGCTGCCG
Mt5_008*F:AAGAAACACAGCGCACCGGC340–120062Medtr5g016230.1gb|FG536800.1|
R:ATGGCAGCCAAGCCCAATGCC
Mt5_010F:TGCTTTGTTCAACACTTCTGGATGGT32062Medtr5g016380.1gb|CD858783.1|
R:GCAGCGCGAATCATGGTAATGGAG
Mt5_012*F:GGTTGATCCGGAGATTCTCGACGC120062Medtr5g016490.1gb|FG537114.1|
R:AGGAGTATTGGCCAGAACACGGG
Mt5_013F:AGTCGTGTGTACTCATTCATCCGC25062Medtr5g018040.1gb|FG536363.1|
R:TGGTTACTTCAGAACGATGGAAACCG
Mt5_015F:CGGTTGGAGAAGATGGTTCTGTTTGGG330–45062Medtr5g019760.1gb|FG535260.1|
R:CCATCCGCATAATAGCCCCACCC
Mt5_017F:CCATGGCCCATTCAATTGCTGATGC35062Medtr5g021320.1gb|CD859147.1|
R:ACTGATATGGTGGATGAGTTGCTTGC
Mt5_018*F:TCCACATAATCGCCAGCAAATCCC20062Medtr5g021730.1gb|FG530030.1|
R:GCCGACGTTGTTGCCACCG
Mt5_019F:TGCCCATTGGTTTTCCCTGCGG120062Medtr5g022640.1gb|CD861082.1|
R:CATGATCGAAGATGATTGCGCCG
Mt5_020*F:CACCCGAAGAGACTGCGAAAGCG52062Medtr5g024350.1gb|FG530254.1|
R:TCTGGACTGTGCTTTTTGTACTGCC
Mt5_021F:GGAGATGCATTGGAGCCGGG51062Medtr5g027470.1gb|CD859365.1|
R:CGAGTTCCTTTCCAATGAGTTTCTCCC
Mt5_022F:GGCGATGAAATAGTGGAAGAGAGTCCG51062Medtr5g032270.1gb|FG534942.1|
R:TGGTGTTTGGAAGTCACAGTGAACCC
Mt5_023F:AGTGGATGAAGCGGGCTGCC15062Medtr5g034530.1gb|FG536062.1|
R:CACCCTTTTCACCAGCACGGC
Mt5_024*F:AAAGCTCCTGGTTCTGTCCGC300–42062Medtr5g036270.1gb|FG530106.1|
R:TCACCTCACATCCTTCTCCAATGGG
Mt5_025*F:ACACAGGAAGACGCAGTTCTGCC72062Medtr5g036610.1gb|FG535769.1|
R:CGTGATGCTTTGTAAAGAAGGGCGC
Mt5_026F:ACTCTTAGTGCTGGATTGGAGGGC39062Medtr5g038320.1gb|FG530798.1|
R:ACGACTTTCTCAAAGCCATCCGC
Mt5_027*F:GCCATTGCTAGATTTTGGGTTGCC600–120058Medtr5g038460.1gb|FG536762.1|
R:TGAGCAGCAAATGCCTCAGCCC
Mt5_028F:GGCTCCATCTCCCGCATCCG98058Medtr5g039270.1gb|FG535137.1|
R:CTCCTCAAAGGTACATCAGCTCGC
Mt5_029F:TCCACAACCCCAACAACAACAACA28060Medtr5g044680.1gb|FG533184.1|
R:ACTTTGTGTCCATGCTTTTGCACC
Mt5_030F:CATGGTGCACACCTCCACGC490–55060Medtr5g045820.1gb|FG533235.1|
R:TTTCCGTGCTTCAGCAGCCG
Mt5_031F:TTCTTTCCGGAGGGAACACGC52060Medtr5g046470.1gb|EX569990.1|
R:GGCTTGAGTCAGCACACTTGCG
Mt5_033*F:AGTTGGGTGAGGAATTGCAGGC420–43062Medtr5g048930.1emb|AM161971.1|
R:TGGAGCTTATAGTGAGAATTTGCCGC
Mt5_034*F:ACATGAATCTTGACATCGTCACCAGG48060Medtr5g049600.1gb|GH720878.1|
R:ACTGTCATAGATACTCTTTGCAAGCGC
Mt5_036F:TCATGAGTCTTTGTCAGAGGCCCG51060Medtr5g065000.1gb|FG530443.1|
R:TCTAGCCGCAACTTTTCTGAATTTGCC
Mt5_037*F:AGTCCTGATCTTGTCTTAGGTGTGCC55062Medtr5g065120.1gb|FG533265.1|
R:GCAAAGCCTTCTTCCATTACTGAGGG
Mt5_038F:GATGTTGCAACTGGTTATGGTGTGGG51061Medtr5g066790.1gb|FG529092.1|
R:ACTGAGGAACTAACCCGATTGGCC
Mt5_039F:TGCAGACGATGTGTTACCACCGG43061Medtr5g067140.1gb|FG533231.1|
R:CCATGCCAGTTCTCAGTCGTGGA
Mt5_041F:TTATGGGCTGTGGAAGACACCGG29062Medtr5g068460.1gb|FG531379.1|
R:GCCTTGTGATAATGCATCCTCAGCC
Mt5_042*F:AACTTGCTCTGGTGCATGGGC32062Medtr5g068500.1gb|FG530312.1|
R:AACTTCCCTGGCTCGAGCACTCCG
Mt5_043*F:TCCAAGAACACCACAACCACTGCA40058Medtr5g069000.1gb|FG534946.1|
R:TCCAGATCCTCCTGTTACAGCCAGA
Mt5_044F:TGGCTGAGAAAACTGACCCTGGG66062Medtr5g069480.1gb|FG535471.1|
R:AAACCTGGCATGAAGAGAGTAACCG
Mt5_045F:TGGTTCTCATGTCTGGTGGGCC39562Medtr5g071720.1gb|FG530120.1|
R:CCCTATTGCCGGGTTTGGACGC
Mt5_046*F:TCAGTTCTTCTATGCAATAGAGCGGC38062Medtr5g072140.1gb|FG536413.1|
R:AGCCTCAAACAAAGCCCTTGCC
Mt5_047F:GCACTTGAATCCGCGGAACGC49062Medtr5g072570.1gb|FG530391.1|
R:TGTGCTTTGCTCCTTGTGGCC
Mt5_048*F:CATTTGCGGTCTGGCCCCG63062Medtr5g072790.1gb|FG536675.1|
R:TGTTTTTGTTGCAGTCCATGAATTGGC
Mt5_049F:ACAAGATCAGCACCATTGAGGGCC21062Medtr5g072900.1gb|FG535776.1|
R:TCGCTTCAATAATCTGTGCAACCCC
Mt5_050*F:CGGACAGAAGGAAGAAAGCAGAGGC80060Medtr5g073680.1gb|EX568722.1|
R:GAGAAGTTCAGAGCAAGACCAAGCC
Mt5_051*F:ACTGAGCTGCCTCCAACTCACCC480–50058Medtr5g073770.1gb|EX568722.1|
R:GTGCTATCCTTGTATGACTCCTCTCCC
Mt5_052F:CTGGATATAGTGCCGCATCGCC35558Medtr5g075640.1gb|CD860246.1|
R:GAAGTGCACTAAAACCTTCCAAAGGC
Mt5_053*F:GCTTTTGATGTTGATGATGTGGACCC55058Medtr5g077400.1gb|EX569929.1|
R:CCTTAGCTCTTCGAGTGCGTCGG
Mt5_054F:CTCAAATGACTGACATCTTCGAGGGC54058Medtr5g077950.1gb|FG531468.1|
R:CCACGTCGAAGGCTTTCACTTGC
Mt5_055*F:CACCTTGTGCTGTAATAACCAAAAGCC45058Medtr5g079090.1gb|CD858894.1|
R:CTGTCAAGTTTCTAAGGGTTCTCTCCG
Mt5_057F:AACCCCGAAAGGCACATCGG29060Medtr5g079650.1gb|GH719720.1|
R:ACATTTCGAAGTTTTTCCGCCCGG
Mt5_058*F:GGATACTATTTTCGAGGGATCTGTGGC55058Medtr5g080340.1gb|CD858878.1|
R:CGATTTGCAACGCCTGGCCG
Mt5_059*F:TGGCAGCCTCTATACTACGCGC70058Medtr5g080730.1gb|FG531745.1|
R:CGGTAGTCCTCGAGTTTGTGCCC
Mt5_060F:CCATCTCCTCCTTCACCGCGG49062Medtr5g080900.1gb|FG533819.1|
R:GATAACCACGCGCTTCAGCCC
Mt5_061F:AAGAAGCTGTGTTGGACTCTCAGAGGG49562Medtr5g081470.1gb|FG538061.1|
R:CTTACGAGTCCTTGATTTGTCACCCCC
Mt5_064F:GCCACAGCAGCTCGTGATTCTGT610–120058Medtr5g082780.1gb|GH720629.1|
R:TGCTGTTCTTGCATCTCTTCTTCCC
Mt5_065*F:GGATCGTCAGGTTTGGGGTCCG150–35058Medtr5g083280.1gb|GH719482.1|
R:CCACCCAAACATCAACAGCAACGG
Mt5_066*F:ACAACACCCGAACGCTGTGCC820058Medtr5g083430.1gb|EX571173.1|
R:CCTCGGCTGTCCACTCCTCCC
Mt5_067F:GCGCTCCCTTGACATTTCGCG52055Medtr5g084140.1gb|FG534893.1|
R:GAGATTTTGCACCAGTGTTATTCAGCC
Mt5_068F:GTTGTCATTGTTGTTATGCCACGCC29055Medtr5g084410.1gb|FG533023.1|
R:CTGAACTCCATGCTGCTGTAGGG
Mt5_069*F:AAGCCTCAGCTCTCAACATTTAAGGC32058Medtr5g084550.1gb|FG529821.1|
R:TAGCATCTTCATCAAACCCGCCG
Mt5_070*F:CGCTCTCCGTTGCGATACCGG70058Medtr5g084740.1gb|GH720486.1|
R:AGTTCAACATTGCTGCACCGGG
Mt5_071*F:CCGGCTCATTGATGATATGGTGGC40058Medtr5g084890.1gb|CD860585.1|
R:TGTTTGTGCTGGTTTCTCCACCC
Mt5_072*F:TCTCACATCTGGCATGGCTGGC20058Medtr5g085020.1gb|CD860768.1|
R:GCCACCCAACACAAGTAATGGCG
Mt5_073F:ACACGTGGAATGGATGTTGAAGGG120055Medtr5g085470.1gb|FG533378.1|
R:AAGAACCACCCTCAGCCTTTCGC
Mt5_074F:TGCACAGCAGTTGCCAGAGGA80055Medtr5g085560.1gb|FG537000.1|
R:CTTGTTTCCACTCATCCGAGCTTCA
Mt5_075*F:CAGAGAACAAGCAAGAAAAAGGGGC750–80058Medtr5g085630.1gb|FG534721.1|
R:ACCGGTCATCCACCTCCCGC
Ps4_001F:TTGGCCAAACTGCTTGTCAAACTTGG36359Medtr8g008440FG531483
R:GCCTTGGGGGCATCATTAACATCATCC
Ps4_003F:TCCCGGTACATGGAGCTCTAGTTG56851Medtr8g008880FG537838
R:AGGCTGCAAGAGAAATTCTTGGTCC
Ps4_004F:TTCGGGTTACAACCCTTTCACGG68455Medtr8g011640FG530764
R:GCGCGCCATGACTATAGCAGC
Ps4_005F:TTCTGGATTTGACCAAGAAGCGGC62858Medtr8g011640FG530764
R:TGAAAATCTCCGAACCGGGAACAC
Ps4_006F:TGTCCCAAACCTACTTCGCTCCG22061Medtr8g015460FG538362
R:TGGCCGTCAACTTTCTATTCACCGC
Ps4_007F:GAACCCAATCAAGTGTTGTTGTACGC27559Medtr8g021260FG530143
R:TCATCACGTACAATCACTGACATACGC
Ps4_009F:AGGTGGCAGGCTCGAATCGG60159Medtr8g024670FG533947
R:AGGTGTCGACGTACTCCCGC
Ps4_010F:GCACACGATGATGTGGATGGAGAATGC21058Medtr8g026430FG529623
R:TGTCACAGCCGAAGTGAGCCC
Ps4_012F:AGCTGGATGGGTTTGATGCCCG42556Medtr8g027050EX570946
R:ATCCAATCGCCCAGGCCGC
Mt8_002*F:GTGCTTCTACAAGATCATATTGGCGGC30061Medtr8g008860FG537838
R:GCTTGCAACTGATACTCTTGGACCG

Note : Ta = annealing temperature

Polymorphic EST-derived genic markers.

Table 2.

Results of 33 polymorphic EST-derived genic loci screened in 16 genotypes of Pisum sativum.

LocusAHeHoPIC
Mt5_0120.48000.00000.3648
Mt5_0330.35070.00000.3222
Mt5_0430.63910.00000.5659
Mt5_0520.20410.00000.1833
Mt5_0620.40320.00000.3219
Mt5_0820.42340.00000.3338
Mt5_1220.26040.00000.2265
Mt5_1820.03770.03850.0370
Mt5_2020.45270.00000.3502
Mt5_2430.32250.00000.2896
Mt5_2520.48720.04000.3685
Mt5_2720.32000.00000.2688
Mt5_3320.15280.00000.1411
Mt5_3420.21880.00000.1948
Mt5_3720.37500.00000.3047
Mt5_4220.06050.06250.0587
Mt5_4320.49920.00000.3746
Mt5_4620.48000.00000.3648
Mt5_4820.39350.00000.3161
Mt5_5020.49700.00000.3735
Mt5_5130.54080.00000.4529
Mt5_5320.26040.00000.2265
Mt5_5520.07400.00000.0712
Mt5_5820.07400.00000.0712
Mt5_5930.59100.03850.5252
Mt5_6520.48000.00000.3648
Mt5_6620.31070.00000.2624
Mt5_6920.07400.00000.0712
Mt5_7020.14200.00000.1319
Mt5_7120.49700.00000.3735
Mt5_7220.14200.00000.1319
Mt5_7520.47340.00000.3613
Mt8_00220.14200.00000.1319

Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; PIC = polymorphic information content.

Specific primer sequences and characteristics of 75 EST-derived genic markers developed in Pisum sativum. Note : Ta = annealing temperature Polymorphic EST-derived genic markers. Results of 33 polymorphic EST-derived genic loci screened in 16 genotypes of Pisum sativum. Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; PIC = polymorphic information content.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study identifies and characterizes new EST-derived genic markers based on comparative mapping between pea and M. truncatula. Thirty-three polymorphic and 42 monomorphic primer sequences were described in this study. These EST-derived genic markers were mined from conserved M. truncatula gene sequences; therefore, they can be used to anchor genomic regions between pea and M. truncatula and possibly among other members of the legume family. These markers show polymorphism among 16 pea genotypes that include parents of several pea mapping populations being used to map different disease resistance loci. These molecular markers will be useful to develop gene-rich linkage maps and to tag genes for agronomically important traits. In addition, amplification of these markers in lentil demonstrates the transferability of these markers across related species. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  8 in total

1.  Development and characterization of 41 novel EST-SSR markers for Pisum sativum (Leguminosae).

Authors:  Sheng-Chun Xu; Ya-Ming Gong; Wei-Hua Mao; Qi-Zan Hu; Gu-Wen Zhang; Wan Fu; Qiang-Qiang Xian
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis.

Authors:  Kejun Liu; Spencer V Muse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues.

Authors:  S O Rogers; A J Bendich
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Functional mapping in pea, as an aid to the candidate gene selection and for investigating synteny with the model legume Medicago truncatula.

Authors:  G Aubert; J Morin; F Jacquin; K Loridon; M C Quillet; A Petit; C Rameau; I Lejeune-Hénaut; T Huguet; J Burstin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species.

Authors:  Hong-Kyu Choi; Jeong-Hwan Mun; Dong-Jin Kim; Hongyan Zhu; Jong-Min Baek; Joanne Mudge; Bruce Roe; Noel Ellis; Jeff Doyle; Gyorgy B Kiss; Nevin D Young; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A sequence-based genetic map of Medicago truncatula and comparison of marker colinearity with M. sativa.

Authors:  Hong-Kyu Choi; Dongjin Kim; Taesik Uhm; Eric Limpens; Hyunju Lim; Jeong-Hwan Mun; Peter Kalo; R Varma Penmetsa; Andrea Seres; Olga Kulikova; Bruce A Roe; Ton Bisseling; Gyorgy B Kiss; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Translational Genomics in Legumes Allowed Placing In Silico 5460 Unigenes on the Pea Functional Map and Identified Candidate Genes in Pisum sativum L.

Authors:  Amandine Bordat; Vincent Savois; Marie Nicolas; Jérome Salse; Aurélie Chauveau; Michael Bourgeois; Jean Potier; Hervé Houtin; Céline Rond; Florent Murat; Pascal Marget; Grégoire Aubert; Judith Burstin
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Development and characterization of 37 novel EST-SSR markers in Pisum sativum (Fabaceae).

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhuang; Kevin E McPhee; Tristan E Coram; Tobin L Peever; Martin I Chilvers
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 1.936

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Genetic diversity and population structure among pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars as revealed by simple sequence repeat and novel genic markers.

Authors:  Shalu Jain; Ajay Kumar; Sujan Mamidi; Kevin McPhee
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Microsatellite markers: what they mean and why they are so useful.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Carneiro Vieira; Luciane Santini; Augusto Lima Diniz; Carla de Freitas Munhoz
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.771

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.