Sang-Ging Ong1, Won Hee Lee1, Mei Huang1, Devaveena Dey1, Kazuki Kodo1, Veronica Sanchez-Freire1, Joseph D Gold1, Joseph C Wu2. 1. From the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (S.-G.O., W.H.L., M.H., D.D., K.K., V.S.-F., J.D.G., J.C.W.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (S.-G.O., W.H.L., K.K., V.S.-F., J.C.W.), Department of Radiology (M.H., D.D., J.C.W.), and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.D.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA. 2. From the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (S.-G.O., W.H.L., M.H., D.D., K.K., V.S.-F., J.D.G., J.C.W.); and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (S.-G.O., W.H.L., K.K., V.S.-F., J.C.W.), Department of Radiology (M.H., D.D., J.C.W.), and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.D.G.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA. joewu@stanford.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the promise shown by stem cells for restoration of cardiac function after myocardial infarction, the poor survival of transplanted cells has been a major issue. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF1) is a transcription factor that mediates adaptive responses to ischemia. Here, we hypothesize that codelivery of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) with a nonviral minicircle plasmid carrying HIF1 (MC-HIF1) into the ischemic myocardium can improve the survival of transplanted CPCs. METHODS AND RESULTS: After myocardial infarction, CPCs were codelivered intramyocardially into adult NOD/SCID mice with saline, MC-green fluorescent protein, or MC-HIF1 versus MC-HIF1 alone (n=10 per group). Bioluminescence imaging demonstrated better survival when CPCs were codelivered with MC-HIF1. Importantly, echocardiography showed mice injected with CPCs+MC-HIF1 had the highest ejection fraction 6 weeks after myocardial infarction (57.1±2.6%; P=0.002) followed by MC-HIF1 alone (48.5±2.6%; P=0.04), with no significant protection for CPCs+MC-green fluorescent protein (44.8±3.3%; P=NS) when compared with saline control (38.7±3.2%). In vitro mechanistic studies confirmed that cardiac endothelial cells produced exosomes that were actively internalized by recipient CPCs. Exosomes purified from endothelial cells overexpressing HIF1 had higher contents of miR-126 and miR-210. These microRNAs activated prosurvival kinases and induced a glycolytic switch in recipient CPCs, giving them increased tolerance when subjected to in vitro hypoxic stress. Inhibiting both of these miRs blocked the protective effects of the exosomes. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, HIF1 can be used to modulate the host microenvironment for improving survival of transplanted cells. The exosomal transfer of miRs from host cells to transplanted cells represents a unique mechanism that can be potentially targeted for improving survival of transplanted cells.
BACKGROUND: Despite the promise shown by stem cells for restoration of cardiac function after myocardial infarction, the poor survival of transplanted cells has been a major issue. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF1) is a transcription factor that mediates adaptive responses to ischemia. Here, we hypothesize that codelivery of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) with a nonviral minicircle plasmid carrying HIF1 (MC-HIF1) into the ischemic myocardium can improve the survival of transplanted CPCs. METHODS AND RESULTS: After myocardial infarction, CPCs were codelivered intramyocardially into adult NOD/SCIDmice with saline, MC-green fluorescent protein, or MC-HIF1 versus MC-HIF1 alone (n=10 per group). Bioluminescence imaging demonstrated better survival when CPCs were codelivered with MC-HIF1. Importantly, echocardiography showed mice injected with CPCs+MC-HIF1 had the highest ejection fraction 6 weeks after myocardial infarction (57.1±2.6%; P=0.002) followed by MC-HIF1 alone (48.5±2.6%; P=0.04), with no significant protection for CPCs+MC-green fluorescent protein (44.8±3.3%; P=NS) when compared with saline control (38.7±3.2%). In vitro mechanistic studies confirmed that cardiac endothelial cells produced exosomes that were actively internalized by recipient CPCs. Exosomes purified from endothelial cells overexpressing HIF1 had higher contents of miR-126 and miR-210. These microRNAs activated prosurvival kinases and induced a glycolytic switch in recipient CPCs, giving them increased tolerance when subjected to in vitro hypoxic stress. Inhibiting both of these miRs blocked the protective effects of the exosomes. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, HIF1 can be used to modulate the host microenvironment for improving survival of transplanted cells. The exosomal transfer of miRs from host cells to transplanted cells represents a unique mechanism that can be potentially targeted for improving survival of transplanted cells.
Authors: Shusheng Wang; Arin B Aurora; Brett A Johnson; Xiaoxia Qi; John McAnally; Joseph A Hill; James A Richardson; Rhonda Bassel-Duby; Eric N Olson Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Mei Huang; ZhiYing Chen; Shijun Hu; Fangjun Jia; Zongjin Li; Grant Hoyt; Robert C Robbins; Mark A Kay; Joseph C Wu Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Helena C Christianson; Katrin J Svensson; Toin H van Kuppevelt; Jin-Ping Li; Mattias Belting Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carme Camps; Francesca M Buffa; Stefano Colella; John Moore; Christos Sotiriou; Helen Sheldon; Adrian L Harris; Jonathan M Gleadle; Jiannis Ragoussis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Julián Aragonés; Martin Schneider; Katie Van Geyte; Peter Fraisl; Tom Dresselaers; Massimiliano Mazzone; Ruud Dirkx; Serena Zacchigna; Hélène Lemieux; Nam Ho Jeoung; Diether Lambrechts; Tammie Bishop; Peggy Lafuste; Antonio Diez-Juan; Sarah K Harten; Pieter Van Noten; Katrien De Bock; Carsten Willam; Marc Tjwa; Alexandra Grosfeld; Rachel Navet; Lieve Moons; Thierry Vandendriessche; Christophe Deroose; Bhathiya Wijeyekoon; Johan Nuyts; Benedicte Jordan; Robert Silasi-Mansat; Florea Lupu; Mieke Dewerchin; Chris Pugh; Phil Salmon; Luc Mortelmans; Bernard Gallez; Frans Gorus; Johan Buyse; Francis Sluse; Robert A Harris; Erich Gnaiger; Peter Hespel; Paul Van Hecke; Frans Schuit; Paul Van Veldhoven; Peter Ratcliffe; Myriam Baes; Patrick Maxwell; Peter Carmeliet Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-01-06 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Abdelnaby Khalyfa; Leila Kheirandish-Gozal; Ahamed A Khalyfa; Mona F Philby; María Luz Alonso-Álvarez; Meelad Mohammadi; Rakesh Bhattacharjee; Joaquin Terán-Santos; Lei Huang; Jorge Andrade; David Gozal Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405