Literature DB >> 25199883

Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments to prevent fractures: an updated systematic review.

Carolyn J Crandall, Sydne J Newberry, Allison Diamant, Yee-Wei Lim, Walid F Gellad, Marika J Booth, Aneesa Motala, Paul G Shekelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a major contributor to the propensity to fracture among older adults, and various pharmaceuticals are available to treat it.
PURPOSE: To update a review about the benefits and harms of pharmacologic treatments used to prevent fractures in adults at risk. DATA SOURCES: Multiple computerized databases were searched between 2 January 2005 and 4 March 2014 for English-language studies. STUDY SELECTION: Trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews. DATA EXTRACTION: Duplicate extraction and assessment of data about study characteristics, outcomes, and quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: From more than 52 000 titles screened, 315 articles were included in this update. There is high-strength evidence that bisphosphonates, denosumab, and teriparatide reduce fractures compared with placebo, with relative risk reductions from 0.40 to 0.60 for vertebral fractures and 0.60 to 0.80 for nonvertebral fractures. Raloxifene has been shown in placebo-controlled trials to reduce only vertebral fractures. Since 2007, there is a newly recognized adverse event of bisphosphonate use: atypical subtrochanteric femur fracture. Gastrointestinal side effects, hot flashes, thromboembolic events, and infections vary among drugs. LIMITATIONS: Few studies have directly compared drugs used to treat osteoporosis. Data in men are very sparse. Costs were not assessed.
CONCLUSION: Good-quality evidence supports that several medications for bone density in osteoporotic range and/or preexisting hip or vertebral fracture reduce fracture risk. Side effects vary among drugs, and the comparative effectiveness of the drugs is unclear. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and RAND Corporation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25199883     DOI: 10.7326/M14-0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  68 in total

1.  Duration of anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Robert A Adler
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Exercise for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an evidence-based guide to the optimal prescription.

Authors:  Robin M Daly; Jack Dalla Via; Rachel L Duckham; Steve F Fraser; Eva Wulff Helge
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of monthly delayed-release versus daily immediate-release risedronate tablets in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  Satoshi Soen; Hideaki Kishimoto; Hiroshi Hagino; Teruki Sone; Hiroaki Ohishi; Tsukasa Fujimoto; Emma Sasaki; Sakae Tanaka; Toshitsugu Sugimoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan.

Authors:  T Mori; C J Crandall; D A Ganz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The role of radiography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Daniel López Zúñiga
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-12

7.  Bisphosphonate use after clinical fracture and risk of new fracture: response to comments by Wu et al.

Authors:  J Bergman; A Nordström; P Nordström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Comparative Efficacy of Bisphosphonates to Prevent Fracture in Men with Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Junwen Zhou; Tiansheng Wang; Xilan Zhao; Donald R Miller; Suodi Zhai
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22

Review 9.  Optimising the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ziad Farrah; Ali Sm Jawad
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 10.  Considerations in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Peter J Ostergaard; Matthew J Hall; Tamara D Rozental
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.