Literature DB >> 25199580

Do participant, facilitator, or group factors moderate effectiveness of the Body Project? Implications for dissemination.

Meghan L Butryn1, Paul Rohde2, C Nathan Marti2, Eric Stice2.   

Abstract

The Body Project is a dissonance-based selective eating disorder prevention program with a broad evidence-base. The study sought to determine if previous findings regarding participant moderators replicate in an effectiveness trial under more real-world conditions. This study also had the novel aim of examining facilitator characteristics and group-level variables as potential outcome predictors. These aims are critical for understanding when the intervention is most effective and for whom. Participants were 408 young women with body image concerns recruited from seven universities. Change in eating disorder symptoms at 1-year follow-up was the primary outcome. Intervention effects were significant for both participants who had low or high baseline symptom levels, but the effect size was approximately twice as large for participants with high initial symptom levels (d = 0.58 vs. 0.24). Intervention effects were not predicted by facilitator factors (education, age, BMI, sex) or by group size or attendance rate. This study demonstrates that participants with either low or high eating disorder symptoms will benefit from the intervention but if resources are limited, targeting those with elevated eating disorder symptoms may be sensible. Results also suggest that a wide variety of facilitators can effectively deliver the Body Project, which has encouraging implications for dissemination.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dissemination; Eating disorders; Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25199580      PMCID: PMC4172533          DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  27 in total

Review 1.  Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer; G Terence Wilson; Christopher G Fairburn; W Stewart Agras
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2002-10

2.  Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test.

Authors:  Sara T Brookes; Elise Whitely; Matthias Egger; George Davey Smith; Paul A Mulheran; Tim J Peters
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.

Authors:  John W Graham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Outcome in patients with eating disorders: a 5-year study.

Authors:  D I Ben-Tovim; K Walker; P Gilchrist; R Freeman; R Kalucy; A Esterman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

6.  Dissonance thin-ideal and didactic healthy behavior eating disorder prevention programs: results from a controlled trial.

Authors:  Jill Anne Matusek; Sally J Wendt; Claire V Wiseman
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.861

7.  Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis.

Authors:  Alan Feingold
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-03

8.  Effects of a cognitive dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program are similar for Asian American, Hispanic, and White participants.

Authors:  Rosalía Rodriguez; Erica Marchand; Janet Ng; Eric Stice
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  An effectiveness trial of a dissonance-based eating disorder prevention program for high-risk adolescent girls.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Paul Rohde; Jeff Gau; Heather Shaw
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-10

10.  An effectiveness trial of a new enhanced dissonance eating disorder prevention program among female college students.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Meghan L Butryn; Paul Rohde; Heather Shaw; C Nathan Marti
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2013-10-19
View more
  6 in total

1.  Adapting the body project to a non-western culture: a dissonance-based eating disorders prevention program for Saudi women.

Authors:  Munirah AlShebali; Carolyn Becker; Stephen Kellett; Ahmad AlHadi; Glenn Waller
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Moderators of two dual eating disorder and obesity prevention programs.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Christopher D Desjardins; Heather Shaw; Paul Rohde
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2019-04-12

3.  Does Group Size Matter? Group Size and Symptom Reduction Among Incarcerated Women Receiving Psychotherapy Following Sexual Violence Victimization.

Authors:  Aubrey R Dueweke; Danielle E Higuera; Melissa J Zielinski; Marie E Karlsson; Ana J Bridges
Journal:  Int J Group Psychother       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Effects of sex composition on group processes in alcohol prevention groups for teens.

Authors:  Tracey A Garcia; Guadalupe A Bacio; Kristin Tomlinson; Benjamin O Ladd; Kristen G Anderson
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Integrating intervention targets offered by homeostatic theory.

Authors:  Rachel A Annunziato; Stephanie L Grossman
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2016-03-27

6.  The effects of different recruitment and incentive strategies for body acceptance programs on college women.

Authors:  Marisol Perez; Tara K Ohrt; Amanda B Bruening
Journal:  Eat Disord       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.222

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.