STUDY OBJECTIVES:Suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, improves sleep in healthy subjects (HS) and patients with insomnia. We compared the electroencephalographic (EEG) power spectral density (PSD) profile of suvorexant with placebo using data from a phase 2 trial in patients with insomnia. We also compared suvorexant's PSD profile with the profiles of other insomnia treatments using data from 3 HS studies. DESIGN: Phase 2 trial--randomized, double-blind, two-period (4 w per period) crossover. HS studies--randomized, double-blind, crossover. SETTING: Sleep laboratories. PARTICIPANTS: Insomnia patients (n = 229) orHS (n = 124). INTERVENTIONS: Phase 2 trial--suvorexant 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, placebo; HS study 1--suvorexant 10 mg, 50 mg, placebo; HS study 2--gaboxadol 15 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, placebo; HS study 3--trazodone 150 mg, placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The PSD of the EEG signal at 1-32 Hz of each PSG recording during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep were calculated. The day 1 and day 28 PSD profiles of suvorexant at all four doses during NREM and REM sleep in patients with insomnia were generally flat and close to 1.0 (placebo) at all frequencies. The day 1 PSD profile of suvorexant in HS was similar to that in insomnia patients. In contrast, the other three drugs had distinct PSD profiles in HS that differed from each other. CONCLUSIONS:Suvorexant at clinically effective doses had limited effects on power spectral density compared with placebo in healthy subjects and in patients with insomnia, in contrast to the three comparison insomnia treatments. These findings suggest the possibility that antagonism of the orexin pathway might lead to improvements in sleep without major changes in the patient's neurophysiology as assessed by electroencephalographic.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES:Suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, improves sleep in healthy subjects (HS) and patients with insomnia. We compared the electroencephalographic (EEG) power spectral density (PSD) profile of suvorexant with placebo using data from a phase 2 trial in patients with insomnia. We also compared suvorexant's PSD profile with the profiles of other insomnia treatments using data from 3 HS studies. DESIGN: Phase 2 trial--randomized, double-blind, two-period (4 w per period) crossover. HS studies--randomized, double-blind, crossover. SETTING: Sleep laboratories. PARTICIPANTS: Insomniapatients (n = 229) or HS (n = 124). INTERVENTIONS: Phase 2 trial--suvorexant 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, placebo; HS study 1--suvorexant 10 mg, 50 mg, placebo; HS study 2--gaboxadol 15 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, placebo; HS study 3--trazodone 150 mg, placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The PSD of the EEG signal at 1-32 Hz of each PSG recording during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep were calculated. The day 1 and day 28 PSD profiles of suvorexant at all four doses during NREM and REM sleep in patients with insomnia were generally flat and close to 1.0 (placebo) at all frequencies. The day 1 PSD profile of suvorexant in HS was similar to that in insomniapatients. In contrast, the other three drugs had distinct PSD profiles in HS that differed from each other. CONCLUSIONS:Suvorexant at clinically effective doses had limited effects on power spectral density compared with placebo in healthy subjects and in patients with insomnia, in contrast to the three comparison insomnia treatments. These findings suggest the possibility that antagonism of the orexin pathway might lead to improvements in sleep without major changes in the patient's neurophysiology as assessed by electroencephalographic.
Authors: David Michelson; Ellen Snyder; Erin Paradis; Mary Chengan-Liu; Duane B Snavely; Jill Hutzelmann; James K Walsh; Andrew D Krystal; Ruth M Benca; Martin Cohn; Christopher Lines; Thomas Roth; W Joseph Herring Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Anthony L Gotter; Anthony J Roecker; Richard Hargreaves; Paul J Coleman; Christopher J Winrow; John J Renger Journal: Prog Brain Res Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.453
Authors: Christopher J Winrow; Anthony L Gotter; Christopher D Cox; Scott M Doran; Pamela L Tannenbaum; Michael J Breslin; Susan L Garson; Steven V Fox; Charles M Harrell; Joanne Stevens; Duane R Reiss; Donghui Cui; Paul J Coleman; John J Renger Journal: J Neurogenet Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 1.250
Authors: Daniel J Buysse; Anne Germain; Martica L Hall; Douglas E Moul; Eric A Nofzinger; Amy Begley; Cindy L Ehlers; Wesley Thompson; David J Kupfer Journal: Sleep Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Anthony L Gotter; Susan L Garson; Joanne Stevens; Regina L Munden; Steven V Fox; Pamela L Tannenbaum; Lihang Yao; Scott D Kuduk; Terrence McDonald; Jason M Uslaner; Spencer J Tye; Paul J Coleman; Christopher J Winrow; John J Renger Journal: BMC Neurosci Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Anthony L Gotter; Mark S Forman; Charles M Harrell; Joanne Stevens; Vladimir Svetnik; Ka Lai Yee; Xiaodong Li; Anthony J Roecker; Steven V Fox; Pamela L Tannenbaum; Susan L Garson; Inge De Lepeleire; Nicole Calder; Laura Rosen; Arie Struyk; Paul J Coleman; W Joseph Herring; John J Renger; Christopher J Winrow Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 4.379