STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare NREM EEG power in primary insomnia (PI) and good sleeper controls (GSC), examining both sex and NREM period effects; to examine relationships between EEG power, clinical characteristics, and self-reports of sleep. DESIGN: Overnight polysomnographic study. SETTING: Sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: PI (n=48; 29 women) and GSC (n=25; 15 women). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: EEG power from 1-50 Hz was computed for artifact-free sleep epochs across four NREM periods. Repeated measures mixed effect models contrasted differences between groups, EEG frequency bands, and NREM periods. EEG power-frequency curves were modeled using regressions with fixed knot splines. RESULTS: Mixed models showed no significant group (PI vs. GSC) differences; marginal sex differences (delta and theta bands); significant differences across NREM periods; and group*sex and group*NREM period interactions, particularly in beta and gamma bands. Modeled power-frequency curves showed no group difference in whole-night NREM, but PI had higher power than GSC from 18-40 Hz in the first NREM period. Among women, PI had higher 16 to 44-Hz power than GSC in the first 3 NREM periods, and higher 3 to 5-Hz power across all NREM periods. PI and GSC men showed no consistent differences in EEG power. High-frequency EEG power was not related to clinical or subjective sleep ratings in PI. CONCLUSIONS: Women with PI, but not men, showed increased high-frequency and low-frequency EEG activity during NREM sleep compared to GSC, particularly in early NREM periods. Sex and NREM period may moderate quantitative EEG differences between PI and GSC.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare NREM EEG power in primary insomnia (PI) and good sleeper controls (GSC), examining both sex and NREM period effects; to examine relationships between EEG power, clinical characteristics, and self-reports of sleep. DESIGN: Overnight polysomnographic study. SETTING: Sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: PI (n=48; 29 women) and GSC (n=25; 15 women). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: EEG power from 1-50 Hz was computed for artifact-free sleep epochs across four NREM periods. Repeated measures mixed effect models contrasted differences between groups, EEG frequency bands, and NREM periods. EEG power-frequency curves were modeled using regressions with fixed knot splines. RESULTS: Mixed models showed no significant group (PI vs. GSC) differences; marginal sex differences (delta and theta bands); significant differences across NREM periods; and group*sex and group*NREM period interactions, particularly in beta and gamma bands. Modeled power-frequency curves showed no group difference in whole-night NREM, but PI had higher power than GSC from 18-40 Hz in the first NREM period. Among women, PI had higher 16 to 44-Hz power than GSC in the first 3 NREM periods, and higher 3 to 5-Hz power across all NREM periods. PI and GSC men showed no consistent differences in EEG power. High-frequency EEG power was not related to clinical or subjective sleep ratings in PI. CONCLUSIONS:Women with PI, but not men, showed increased high-frequency and low-frequency EEG activity during NREM sleep compared to GSC, particularly in early NREM periods. Sex and NREM period may moderate quantitative EEG differences between PI and GSC.
Authors: Irwin Feinberg; Lisa M Higgins; Wong Yu Khaw; Ian G Campbell Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Anne Germain; Robin Richardson; Douglas E Moul; Oommen Mammen; Gretchen Haas; Steven D Forman; Noelle Rode; Amy Begley; Eric A Nofzinger Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-04-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael R Dolsen; Philip Cheng; J Todd Arnedt; Leslie Swanson; Melynda D Casement; Hyang Sook Kim; Jennifer R Goldschmied; Robert F Hoffmann; Roseanne Armitage; Patricia J Deldin Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: You Meme Wu; Regina Pietrone; J David Cashmere; Amy Begley; Jean M Miewald; Anne Germain; Daniel J Buysse Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Julio Fernandez-Mendoza; Yun Li; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Jidong Fang; Jordan Gaines; Susan L Calhoun; Duanping Liao; Edward O Bixler Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 5.849