Literature DB >> 25197446

Genomic standards consortium projects.

Dawn Field1, Peter Sterk2, Renzo Kottmann3, J Wim De Smet4, Linda Amaral-Zettler5, Guy Cochrane6, James R Cole7, Neil Davies8, Peter Dawyndt4, George M Garrity9, Jack A Gilbert10, Frank Oliver Glöckner3, Lynette Hirschman11, Hans-Peter Klenk12, Rob Knight13, Nikos Kyrpides14, Folker Meyer15, Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi16, Norman Morrison17, Robert Robbins18, Inigo San Gil19, Susanna Sansone2, Lynn Schriml20, Tatiana Tatusova16, Dave Ussery21, Pelin Yilmaz3, Owen White20, John Wooley18, Gregory Caporaso22.   

Abstract

The Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) is an open-membership community that was founded in 2005 to work towards the development, implementation and harmonization of standards in the field of genomics. Starting with the defined task of establishing a minimal set of descriptions the GSC has evolved into an active standards-setting body that currently has 18 ongoing projects, with additional projects regularly proposed from within and outside the GSC. Here we describe our recently enacted policy for proposing new activities that are intended to be taken on by the GSC, along with the template for proposing such new activities.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197446      PMCID: PMC4148985          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5559680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


The Genomic Standards Consortium

The Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) is an open-membership community working towards the development, implementation and harmonization of standards in the field of genomics. The mission of the GSC is to improve digital descriptions of genomes, metagenomes and gene marker sequences. The GSC started in late 2005 with the defined task of establishing what is now termed the “Minimum Information about any Sequence” (MIxS) standard [1,2]. As an outgrowth of the activities surrounding the creation and implementation of the MixS standard there are now 18 projects within the GSC [3]. These efforts cover an ever widening range of standardization activities. Given the growth of projects and to promote transparency, participation and adoption the GSC has developed a “GSC Project Description Template”. A complete set of GSC Project Descriptions and the template are available on the GSC website. The GSC has an open policy of participation and continues to welcome new efforts. Any projects that facilitate the standard descriptions and exchange of data are potential candidates for inclusion under the GSC umbrella. Areas that expand the scope of the GSC are encouraged. Through these collective activities we hope to help foster the growth of the ‘bioinformatics standards’ community. For more information on the GSC and its range of projects, please see http://gensc.org/.

Initiating and maintaining a project within the GSC

The GSC Project Description template provides a uniform set of statements covering the purpose of the project, the main contacts, the relationship to other projects in the GSC, and other key details that will help the GSC and the wider community to join and use the work of each project group. Active projects must update their project descriptions annually and submit them to the GSC Board for review. Over time, the list of GSC projects will evolve as activities are added, merged, split or deprecated as demand dictates. Each project should maintain a balanced set of members, especially when the primary goal is to create consensus-driven data sharing solutions. Project Chairs and members form the core of the GSC. Chairs of projects/working groups report to the GSC Board and help drive GSC workshops and other events. Project working groups define the strategy of the GSC, plan core GSC workshops and host satellite meetings. All working members of GSC projects are encouraged to use GSC events as their primary working forum. To initiate a new GSC project, or to bring an existing project into the GSC, one or more “champions” prepare a Project Description and present it to the GSC Board. This starts the process of establishing the project within the GSC. Projects are formally voted into the GSC at annual meetings. All proposed GSC activities are open to challenge and improvement over time, especially because the technologies that underpin data sharing change rapidly. Ideally, a balanced working group will be established for all GSC projects, which should be consensus-driven. By coming together as a community with a common goal and shared interests, we will strengthen and accelerate work towards the goals of establishing best-practices in the capture and exchange of contextual information. The GSC helps grow an ecosystem of standards, tools and resources for empowering a broad community of researchers to describe and share their data. This in turn accelerates the standardization and exchange of an increasing number of data types, and in the long run, promotes open and facile data sharing, thus resolving a current bottleneck for many projects and investigators.
  3 in total

1.  Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications.

Authors:  Pelin Yilmaz; Renzo Kottmann; Dawn Field; Rob Knight; James R Cole; Linda Amaral-Zettler; Jack A Gilbert; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; Anjanette Johnston; Guy Cochrane; Robert Vaughan; Christopher Hunter; Joonhong Park; Norman Morrison; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Peter Sterk; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Mark Bailey; Laura Baumgartner; Bruce W Birren; Martin J Blaser; Vivien Bonazzi; Tim Booth; Peer Bork; Frederic D Bushman; Pier Luigi Buttigieg; Patrick S G Chain; Emily Charlson; Elizabeth K Costello; Heather Huot-Creasy; Peter Dawyndt; Todd DeSantis; Noah Fierer; Jed A Fuhrman; Rachel E Gallery; Dirk Gevers; Richard A Gibbs; Inigo San Gil; Antonio Gonzalez; Jeffrey I Gordon; Robert Guralnick; Wolfgang Hankeln; Sarah Highlander; Philip Hugenholtz; Janet Jansson; Andrew L Kau; Scott T Kelley; Jerry Kennedy; Dan Knights; Omry Koren; Justin Kuczynski; Nikos Kyrpides; Robert Larsen; Christian L Lauber; Teresa Legg; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Wolfgang Ludwig; Donna Lyons; Eamonn Maguire; Barbara A Methé; Folker Meyer; Brian Muegge; Sara Nakielny; Karen E Nelson; Diana Nemergut; Josh D Neufeld; Lindsay K Newbold; Anna E Oliver; Norman R Pace; Giriprakash Palanisamy; Jörg Peplies; Joseph Petrosino; Lita Proctor; Elmar Pruesse; Christian Quast; Jeroen Raes; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Jacques Ravel; David A Relman; Susanna Assunta-Sansone; Patrick D Schloss; Lynn Schriml; Rohini Sinha; Michelle I Smith; Erica Sodergren; Aymé Spo; Jesse Stombaugh; James M Tiedje; Doyle V Ward; George M Weinstock; Doug Wendel; Owen White; Andrew Whiteley; Andreas Wilke; Jennifer R Wortman; Tanya Yatsunenko; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  The Genomic Standards Consortium.

Authors:  Dawn Field; Linda Amaral-Zettler; Guy Cochrane; James R Cole; Peter Dawyndt; George M Garrity; Jack Gilbert; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Lynette Hirschman; Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi; Hans-Peter Klenk; Rob Knight; Renzo Kottmann; Nikos Kyrpides; Folker Meyer; Inigo San Gil; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Lynn M Schriml; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; David W Ussery; Owen White; John Wooley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 8.029

  3 in total
  21 in total

1.  Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.8: overview and updates.

Authors:  Supratim Mukherjee; Dimitri Stamatis; Jon Bertsch; Galina Ovchinnikova; Jagadish Chandrabose Sundaramurthi; Janey Lee; Mahathi Kandimalla; I-Min A Chen; Nikos C Kyrpides; T B K Reddy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.6.0: new tools and advanced capabilities.

Authors:  I-Min A Chen; Ken Chu; Krishnaveni Palaniappan; Anna Ratner; Jinghua Huang; Marcel Huntemann; Patrick Hajek; Stephan Ritter; Neha Varghese; Rekha Seshadri; Simon Roux; Tanja Woyke; Emiley A Eloe-Fadrosh; Natalia N Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  MG-RAST version 4-lessons learned from a decade of low-budget ultra-high-throughput metagenome analysis.

Authors:  Folker Meyer; Saurabh Bagchi; Somali Chaterji; Wolfgang Gerlach; Ananth Grama; Travis Harrison; Tobias Paczian; William L Trimble; Andreas Wilke
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  MEBS, a software platform to evaluate large (meta)genomic collections according to their metabolic machinery: unraveling the sulfur cycle.

Authors:  Valerie De Anda; Icoquih Zapata-Peñasco; Augusto Cesar Poot-Hernandez; Luis E Eguiarte; Bruno Contreras-Moreira; Valeria Souza
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  Metagenomics survey unravels diversity of biogas microbiomes with potential to enhance productivity in Kenya.

Authors:  Samuel Mwangangi Muturi; Lucy Wangui Muthui; Paul Mwangi Njogu; Justus Mong'are Onguso; Francis Nyamu Wachira; Stephen Obol Opiyo; Roger Pelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Recommendations for connecting molecular sequence and biodiversity research infrastructures through ELIXIR.

Authors:  Robert M Waterhouse; Anne-Françoise Adam-Blondon; Donat Agosti; Petr Baldrian; Bachir Balech; Erwan Corre; Robert P Davey; Henrik Lantz; Graziano Pesole; Christian Quast; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Niels Raes; Anna Sandionigi; Monica Santamaria; Wouter Addink; Jiri Vohradsky; Amandine Nunes-Jorge; Nils Peder Willassen; Jerry Lanfear
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 7.  Characterization of the gut microbiome in epidemiologic studies: the multiethnic cohort experience.

Authors:  Benjamin C Fu; Timothy W Randolph; Unhee Lim; Kristine R Monroe; Iona Cheng; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Meredith A J Hullar; Johanna W Lampe
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  High quality draft genome sequence and analysis of Pontibacter roseus type strain SRC-1(T) (DSM 17521(T)) isolated from muddy waters of a drainage system in Chandigarh, India.

Authors:  Supratim Mukherjee; Alla Lapidus; Nicole Shapiro; Jan-Fang Cheng; James Han; Tbk Reddy; Marcel Huntemann; Natalia Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Stefan Spring; Markus Göker; Victor Markowitz; Tanja Woyke; Brian J Tindall; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides; Amrita Pati
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-02-09

9.  High quality draft genome sequence of Corynebacterium ulceribovis type strain IMMIB-L1395(T) (DSM 45146(T)).

Authors:  Atteyet F Yassin; Alla Lapidus; James Han; T B K Reddy; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Natalia Ivanova; Victor Markowitz; Tanja Woyke; Hans-Peter Klenk; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-08-05

10.  High quality draft genome sequence of Flavobacterium rivuli type strain WB 3.3-2(T) (DSM 21788(T)), a valuable source of polysaccharide decomposing enzymes.

Authors:  Richard L Hahnke; Erko Stackebrandt; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Brian J Tindall; Sixing Huang; Manfred Rohde; Alla Lapidus; James Han; Stephan Trong; Matthew Haynes; T B K Reddy; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Victor Markowitz; Tanja Woyke; Markus Göker; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.