Literature DB >> 25197445

Genomic analysis of Agrobacterium radiobacter DSM 30147(T) and emended description of A. radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Sawada et al. 1993.

Linshuang Zhang1, Xiangyang Li1, Feng Zhang1, Gejiao Wang1.   

Abstract

Agrobacterium radiobacter is the only known non-phytopathogenic species in Agrobacterium genus. In this study, the whole-genome sequence of A. radiobacter type strain DSM 30147(T) was described and compared to the other available Agrobacterium genomes. This bacterium has a genome size of 7,122,065 bp distributed in 612 contigs, including 6,834 protein-coding genes and 41 RNA genes. It harbors a circular chromosome and a linear chromosome but not a tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a genome from the A. radiobacter species. In addition, an emended description of A. radiobacter is described. This study reveals information that enhances the current understanding of its non-phytopathogenicity and its phylogenetic position within Agrobacterium genus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrobacterium radiobacter; comparative genomics; emended species description; genome sequence; non-phytopathogenic Agrobacterium

Year:  2014        PMID: 25197445      PMCID: PMC4149017          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.4688352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

DSM 30147T (= ATCC 19358T) was first isolated from saprobic soil in 1902 as [1] and obtained its current name until genus established by Conn in 1942 [2]. Based on phytopathogenic properties, Conn divided into 3 species, , and [2]. Subsequently, , and were also identified within the genus [3-6]. Recently, was transferred to genus, as , based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) using several housekeeping genes (rrs, atpD and recA) [7,8]. In addition, Young et al. proposed that should have priority over , and may not officially represent a species [8,9]. Thus, currently, the genus contains four validly named species, , , and [7-9]. A taxonomic classification that relies on the phytopathogenic phenotypes may not accurately reflect the actual phylogenetic relationships of strains within [10]. Accordingly, an alternative classification method was applied which divided most strains into 3 biovariants (Biovars I, II and III) [10]. Among the 3 biovariants, Biovar I is the most complex group and includes several members (genomovars), designated as genomovar G1 through G9 and G13 [8,11]. At present, two strains in Biovar I have been completely sequenced: H13-3 (G1) and C58 (G8). The genome sequencing revealed that these strains contained two chromosomes and different numbers of plasmids. DSM 30147T also belongs to Biovar I (it is classified as a member of genomovar G4), which indicates its close relationship to C58 and H13-3 [12]. Most strains in the genus are phytopathogens and induce crown gall tumors or hairy root diseases in their host plants [2]. However, is an exception because it does not have the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid that contributes to the pathogenicity [13-16]. members have been widely found in soil, in the rhizosphere of plants and in clinical specimens [17]. A strain of was reported to enhance soil arsenic phytoremediation, indicating a potential application in bioremediation [18]. However, some members have been identified as opportunistic human pathogens [19]. So far, a total of 11 genomes (3 finished and 8 draft genomes, listed in Table 1) have been sequenced but no genome of has been reported. Considering its essential biological feature and important phylogenetic position in the genus , we present the genome sequence of DSM 30147T, the first sequenced strain in this species.
Table 1

General information and comparison of the 14 -related genomes (12 strains and 2 strains)

Strain    Isolation source    Genome    size (Mb)    CDSs    #     Unique gene #     GenBank No.
A. radiobacter DSM 30147T    Soil    7.18    6,834     548     ASXY00000000
A. tumefaciens str. Cherry 2E-2-2    Crown gall infected cherry rootstalk    5.43    5,040     482     APCC00000000
A. tumefaciens CCNWGS0286    Zinc-lead mine tailing    5.21    4,979     489     AGSM00000000
A. albertimagni AOL15    Hot Creek    5.09    4,811     734     ALJF00000000
Agrobacterium sp. 224MFTsu3.1    Plant-associated    4.80    4,593     141a     ARQL00000000
R. lupini HPC (L)    Saline desert soil    5.27    4,614     554     AMQQ00000000
Agrobacterium sp. ATCC 31749    Non plant-associated    5.46    5,529     984     AECL00000000
A. tumefaciens F2    Soil    5.47    5,288     2,070     AFSD00000000
A. tumefaciens 5A    Arsenic-enriched calciaquoll soil    5.74    5,517     539     AGVZ00000000
Agrobacterium sp. 10MFCol1.1    Rhizosphere    5.44    5,280     241b     ARLJ00000000
Agrobacterium sp. H13-3    Rhizosphere of Lupinus luteus    5.57    5,345     1,314     GCA_000192635
A. vitis S4    Vitis vinifera    6.32    5,389     870     GCA_000016285
Rhizobium sp. PDO1-076    Root of Populus deltoids    5.51    5,347     873     AHZC00000000
A. tumefaciens C58    Cherry tree tumor    5.67    5,355     196     GCA_000092025

a, b Genomes were annotated through the RAST system [20]

a, b Genomes were annotated through the RAST system [20] The descriptions of have been reported in 1902 [1], 1942 [2], 1980 [21] and 1993 [22]. After that, fatty acids and utilization of more carbon and nitrogen sources have been tested and showed that the major fatty acids (> 5%) are 16:0, 19:0 cyclo ω8c, summed feature 2 (one or more of 12:0 aldehyde, iso-16:1 I and 14:0 3-OH) and summed feature 8 (18:1ω7c and/or 18:1ω6c) [23]. The strain can utilize adonitol, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-mannitol, lactose and raffinose as sole carbon sources and L-ornithine, L-proline and L-serine as sole nitrogen sources [23]. Citrate utilization, nitrate reduction and urease are all positive [23]. In this study, we performed more physiological/biochemical analysis and present the emended description of .

Classification and features

Genome sequences and 16S rRNA genes were used for phylogenetic analysis. In view of the close evolutionary relationship and the inconsistent phylogeny between and [12], we pre-analyzed all sequenced strains in these two genera and found that two “ members were very closely related to the 12 members (including strain DSM 30147T). Thus, all of the 12 members with sequenced genomes, two strains [ HPC(L) and PDO1-076] (Table 1) and an out-group strain K84 [7,8], were included in the phylogenetic analysis. A comparison of the 15 genomes revealed a total of 370 proteins that were shared across these genomes. A rooted neighbor-jointing (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the shared amino acid sequences. As shown in Figure 1a, DSM 30147T was in the same cluster as the Biovar I members H13-3 (G1) and C58 (G8), and showed the closest relationship with str. Cherry 2E-2-2. A NJ phylogenetic tree was also constructed based on the 16S rRNA genes (Figure 1b). When comparing the trees generated by the core protein sequences with those generated by 16S rRNA gene sequences, small topological differences in topology were found between them. In comparison to the tree generated using the 370 conserved proteins, some strains could not be distinguished with a high degree of clarity using the 16S rRNA genes. Therefore, phylogenomic analysis was considered a more robust approach than that using the 16S rRNA genes to infer the phylogeny, especially for closely related strains [21,25,26].
Figure 1

Phylogenetic trees highlighting the relationships among DSM 30147T and other closely related sequenced strains. (a) A tree was built based on 370 conserved proteins shared among the 15 genomes (12 strains, 2 strains very closely related to and one out-group strain, K84); (b) A tree inferred from the 16S rRNA genes of the same strains. The phylogenies were inferred by MEGA 5.05 using the neighbor-joining algorithm [20,24], and 1,000 bootstrap repetitions were computed to estimate the reliability of the branching order. The genome accession numbers of the strains used in the phylogenetic reconstructions: AOL15, ALJF00000000; PDO1-076, AHZC00000000; S4, , ASXY01000000; GCA_000016285; H13-3, GCA_000192635; 10MFCol1.1, ARLJ00000000; 5A, AGVZ00000000; F2, AFSD00000000; C58, GCA_000092025; ATCC 31749, AECL00000000; HPC(L), AMQQ00000000; str. Cherry 2E-2-2, APCC00000000; 224MFTsu3.1, ARQL00000000; CCNWGS0286, AGSM00000000 and K84 GCA_000016265.

Phylogenetic trees highlighting the relationships among DSM 30147T and other closely related sequenced strains. (a) A tree was built based on 370 conserved proteins shared among the 15 genomes (12 strains, 2 strains very closely related to and one out-group strain, K84); (b) A tree inferred from the 16S rRNA genes of the same strains. The phylogenies were inferred by MEGA 5.05 using the neighbor-joining algorithm [20,24], and 1,000 bootstrap repetitions were computed to estimate the reliability of the branching order. The genome accession numbers of the strains used in the phylogenetic reconstructions: AOL15, ALJF00000000; PDO1-076, AHZC00000000; S4, , ASXY01000000; GCA_000016285; H13-3, GCA_000192635; 10MFCol1.1, ARLJ00000000; 5A, AGVZ00000000; F2, AFSD00000000; C58, GCA_000092025; ATCC 31749, AECL00000000; HPC(L), AMQQ00000000; str. Cherry 2E-2-2, APCC00000000; 224MFTsu3.1, ARQL00000000; CCNWGS0286, AGSM00000000 and K84 GCA_000016265. Strain DSM 30147T is rod-shaped (0.6-0.8 x 1.5-1.8 μm) (Figure 2). The enzyme activities and carbon sources utilization of strain DSM 30147T were tested using API ZYM, API 20 NE and API ID 32 GN systems and the results are shown in Table 2 and in the emended description of
Figure 2

A transmission micrograph of DSM 30147T, using 200 kV transmission electron microscopy FEI Tecnai G2 20 TWIN (USA). The scale bar represents 1 μm.

Table 2

Classification and general features of DSM 30147T according to the MIGS recommendations [27,28]

MIGS ID       Property         Term          Evidence code
       Current classification         Domain Bacteria         Phylum Proteobacteria         Class Alphaproteobacteria         Order Rhizobiales         Family Rhizobiaceae         Genus Agrobacterium         Species Agrobacterium radiobacter         type strain DSM 30147T          TAS [29]          TAS [28]          TAS [30,31]          TAS [30,32]          TAS [21,33]          TAS [2,21,22,33-35]          TAS [21,22,33]          TAS [1-3]
       Gram stain         negative          TAS [22]
       Cell shape         rod-shaped          TAS [22]
       Motility         motile          IDA
       Sporulation         non-sporulating          TAS [22]
       Optimum temperature         25-28 ºC          TAS [22]
       Carbon source         arabinose, D-glucose, D-melibiose, D-ribose, D-sorbitol, gluconate, histidine,         4-hydroxybenzoate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, inositol, 2-ketogluconate,         L-alanine, L-fucose, L-lactate, L-proline, L-rhamnose, malate, maltose, mannitol,         mannose, N-acetyl glucosamine, propionate, salicin, sodium acetate and sucrose          IDA
       Energy source         chemoorganotroph          TAS [22]
       Terminal electron receptor         molecular oxygen          TAS [22]
MIGS-6.2       pH         6-7          TAS [22]
MIGS-22       Oxygen         aerobic          TAS [22]
MIGS-15       Biotic relationship         free-living          NAS
MIGS-14       Pathogenicity       Biosafety level         non-phytopathogenic         level 1, in individual cases, some members of this species are suspected human pathogens          TAS [36]
MIGS-4       Geographic location         not reported
MIGS-5       Sample collection time         1902          TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1MIGS-4.2       Latitude       Longitude         not reported         not reported
MIGS-4.3       Depth         not reported
MIGS-4.4       Altitude         not reported

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement; NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [37]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

A transmission micrograph of DSM 30147T, using 200 kV transmission electron microscopy FEI Tecnai G2 20 TWIN (USA). The scale bar represents 1 μm. Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement; NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement. These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [37]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

To make a comprehensive genomic comparison for the genomes, the whole genome sequence of DSM 30147T was determined. This draft genome sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number ASXY00000000. The version described in this study is the first version, ASXY01000000. The project information is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3

Project information

MIGS ID          Property          Term
MIGS-31          Finishing quality          High-quality draft
MIGS-28          Libraries used          Illumina Paired-End library (300 bp insert size)
MIGS-29          Sequencing platform          Illumina Hiseq2000
MIGS-31.2          Sequencing coverage          196.3 ×
MIGS-30          Assemblers          SOAPdenovo v1.05
MIGS-32          Gene calling method          GeneMarkS+
          GenBank date of release          July 12, 2013
          NCBI project ID          ASXY00000000
MIGS-13          Source material identifier          DSM 30147T
          Project relevance          Genome comparison

Growth condition and DNA isolation

DSM 30147T was grown aerobically in LB medium [38] at 28 °C for 24 h. The DNA was extracted, concentrated and purified using the QiAamp kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Qiagen, Germany).

Genome sequencing and assembly

Illumina Hiseq2000 with the Paired-End library strategy (300 bp insert size) was used to determine the whole-genome sequence of DSM 30147T and obtained a total of 15,140,909 reads (1.41 Gb data). The detailed methods of library construction and sequencing can be found at Illumina’s official website [39]. Using SOAPdenovo v1.05 [40], these reads were assembled into 612 contigs (> 200 bp) with a genome size of 7,122,065 bp and an average coverage of 196.3 ×.

Genome annotation

The draft genome of DSM 30147T was annotated using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [41], which combines the gene caller GeneMarkS+ [42] with the similarity-based gene detection approach. Protein function classification was performed by searching all the predicted coding sequences of strain DSM 30147T against the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) protein database [43] using Blastp algorithm with E-value cutoff 1-e10.

Genome properties

The whole genome of DSM 30147T is 7,122,065 bp in length, with an average GC content of 59.9%, and distributed in 612 contigs. Compared to the complete reference genome C58 [44] (also belonging to Biovar I,Figure 1), the whole genome of strain DSM 30147T could clearly be divided into 2 replicons, a circular chromosome and a linear chromosome (Figure 3). In accordance with its non-phytopathogenicity phenotype, strain DSM 30147T did not contain a Ti plasmid. Of the 6,894 genes predicted, 6,853 were protein-coding genes (CDSs), and 41 RNA genes. A total of 5,320 CDSs (77.85%) were assigned with putative functions, and the remaining proteins were annotated as the hypothetical proteins. The genome properties and statistics are summarized in Table 4 and Figure 3. The distribution of the genes into COG functional categories is shown in Table 5.
Figure 3

The circular representation of the DSM 30147T circular chromosome (left) and linear chromosome (right). From outside to center, ring 1, 4 show protein-coding genes colored by COG categories on forward/reverse strand; ring 2, 3 denote genes on forward/reverse strand; ring 5 shows G+C% content plot, and the innermost ring shows GC skew.

Table 4

Genome statistics

Attribute             Value          % of Total
Genome size (bp)             7,177,085          100
Number of contigs             612
Contig N50             24,130
Number of replicons             2
Extrachromosomal elements             Unknown
Total genes             7,151          100
     Protein-coding genes             6,834          95.57
     Pseudo genes             276          3.86
     RNA genes             41          0.57
     rRNAs             4
Frameshifted genes             95
DNA coding region (bp)             6,197,065          86.34
Protein-coding genes with function prediction             5,320          77.85
Protein-coding genes assigned to COGs             5,333          78.04
Protein-coding genes with conserved domain             5,986          87.59
Protein-coding genes with transmembrane helices             1,899          27.79
Protein-coding genes with signal peptides             550          8.05
Table 5

Number of protein-coding genes associated with the general COG functional categories in DSM 30147T genome

Code          Value              % age                Description
J          184              2.69                Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A          0              0.00                RNA processing and modification
K          461              6.75                Transcription
L          157              2.30                Replication, recombination and repair
B          0              0.00                Chromatin structure and dynamics
D          39              0.57                Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y          0              0.00                Nuclear structure
V          75              1.10                Defense mechanisms
T          284              4.16                Signal transduction mechanisms
M          282              4.13                Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N          99              1.45                Cell motility
Z          0              0.00                Cytoskeleton
W          0              0.00                Extracellular structures
U          100              1.46                Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O          197              2.88                Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C          336              4.92                Energy production and conversion
G          585              8.56                Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E          757              11.08                Amino acid transport and metabolism
F          115              1.68                Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H          224              3.28                Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I          188              2.75                Lipid transport and metabolism
P          481              7.04                Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q          148              2.17                Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R          684              10.01                General function prediction only
S          546              7.99                Function unknown
-          1501              21.96                Not in COGs
The circular representation of the DSM 30147T circular chromosome (left) and linear chromosome (right). From outside to center, ring 1, 4 show protein-coding genes colored by COG categories on forward/reverse strand; ring 2, 3 denote genes on forward/reverse strand; ring 5 shows G+C% content plot, and the innermost ring shows GC skew.

Comparative genome analysis of DSM 30147T with the other related genomes

Strain DSM 30147T has the largest genome size of the 12 strains sequenced to date and is larger than the 2 very closely related strain genomes as well (Table 1). OrthoMCL [45] was used to perform orthologs clustering analysis for the 14 genomes (Table 1). The results indicate that DSM 30147T shares 1,636 genes with the other 13 strains and contains 548 strain-specific genes (Table 1), which potentially encode products that contribute to species-specific features differentiating from other species [46]. In addition, on average, only 31% core genes were shared among the 14 genomes, which reveals a high-degree of diversity within genus.

Emended description of (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Sawada et al. 1993

This emended description is based on that given by Beijerinck and van Delden 1902, Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) and Sawada et al. 1993 with the following changes. Positive results are observed for acid phosphatase, α-glucosidase, alkaline phosphatase, arginine dihydrolase, β-glucosidase, citrate utilization, esterase (C4), leucine arylamidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, nitrate reduction, urease and valine arylamidase, but negative results for α-galactosidase, α-mannosidase, β-fucosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, chymotrypsin, cystine arylamidase, esterase lipase (C8), lipase (C14) and trypsin. Arabinose, D-glucose, D-melibiose, D-ribose, D-sorbitol, gluconates, histidine, 4-hydroxybenzoate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, inositol, 2-ketogluconate, L-alanine, L-fucose, L-lactate, L-rhamnose, malate, maltose, mannose, N-acetyl glucosamine, propionate, salicin, sodium acetate and sucrose source while cannot assimilate adipate, caprate, 3-hydroxy-benzoate, itaconic acid, glycogen, 5-ketogluconate, phenylacetate, potassium, sodium malonate, suberate and valerate are utilized as the sole carbon sources. L-ornithine, L-proline and L-serine are utilized as nitrogen sources. The major fatty acids (> 5%) are 16:0, 19:0 cyclo ω8c, summed feature 2 (one or more of 12:0 aldehyde, iso-16:1 I and 14:0 3-OH) and summed feature 8 (18:1ω7c and/or 18:1ω6c). The members of this species are nonphytopathogenic, but in individual cases, some members of this species are detected as possible human pathogens.
  27 in total

Review 1.  The microbial pan-genome.

Authors:  Duccio Medini; Claudio Donati; Hervé Tettelin; Vega Masignani; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Validity of the Genus Alcaligenes.

Authors:  H J Conn
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1942-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Comparative genome characterization of Achromobacter members reveals potential genetic determinants facilitating the adaptation to a pathogenic lifestyle.

Authors:  Xiangyang Li; Yao Hu; Jing Gong; Linshuang Zhang; Gejiao Wang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Proposal that Agrobacterium radiobacter has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Request for an opinion.

Authors:  J M Young; S R Pennycook; D R W Watson
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Effect of applying an arsenic-resistant and plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium to enhance soil arsenic phytoremediation by Populus deltoides LH05-17.

Authors:  Q Wang; D Xiong; P Zhao; X Yu; B Tu; G Wang
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Christian J Stoeckert; David S Roos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Proposal for rejection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and revised descriptions for the genus Agrobacterium and for Agrobacterium radiobacter and Agrobacterium rhizogenes.

Authors:  H Sawada; H Ieki; H Oyaizu; S Matsumoto
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1993-10

10.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity of genes encoding anti-microbial traits within plant associated microbes.

Authors:  Walaa K Mousa; Manish N Raizada
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Adjusting microbiome profiles for differences in microbial load by spike-in bacteria.

Authors:  Frank Stämmler; Joachim Gläsner; Andreas Hiergeist; Ernst Holler; Daniela Weber; Peter J Oefner; André Gessner; Rainer Spang
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 14.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.