| Literature DB >> 25197276 |
Junhua Yin1, Changchun Wang1, Qin Shao1, Dihong Qu1, Zhenya Song1, Pengfei Shan2, Tao Zhang1, Jun Xu3, Qin Liang3, Songzhao Zhang4, Jian Huang5.
Abstract
Objective. The association between thyroid nodule (TN) prevalence and metabolic syndrome (MetS) has only rarely been examined in iodine-adequate areas and needs further clarification. We investigated correlations between MetS and TN prevalence in the iodine-adequate area of Hangzhou, China. Material and Method. A cross-sectional study that screened and recruited individuals for cohort research 3 years later. The 13522 subjects (8926 men, 4596 women) were screened in 2009 for all MetS components, thyroid ultrasound (US), and thyroid function. Cohort research recruited 1610 subjects who were screened in both 2009 and 2012, of whom 1061 underwent follow-up research. Results. The prevalence of TN was higher in the MetS (+) group than in the MetS (-) group (χ (2) = 69.63, P < 0.001) and higher in women than in men (χ (2) = 11.65, P = 0.001). Waist circumference (WC) was positively related to the prevalence of TN (OR = 1.022, P < 0.001). Individuals with greater WC in 2009 were more likely to suffer from TN in 2012 (RR = 1.434, P = 0.024). Elevated triglyceride level was a risk factor for developing new TN (RR = 1.001, P = 0.035). Conclusion. Both greater WC and elevated triglycerides are risk factors for new TN in this iodine-adequate area in China.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25197276 PMCID: PMC4150509 DOI: 10.1155/2014/675796
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Figure 1Prevalence of thyroid nodules. (a) The prevalence of thyroid nodules for women was significantly higher than for men in the 40 to 49 age range, 50 to 59 age range, and the age above 70 (χ 2 = 8.904, P = 0.003; χ 2 = 29.044, P < 0.001; χ 2 = 4.631, P = 0.031, respectively). The prevalence of thyroid nodules increased along with increasing age (trend χ 2 test: χ 2 = 515.22 for men, P < 0.001; χ 2 = 921.56 for women, P < 0.001). (b) The prevalence of thyroid nodule in the MetS (+) group was higher than in the MetS (−) group for both sexes together (41.71% (1157/2774) versus 33.23% (3572/10748), χ 2 = 69.63, P < 0.001) and for men and women separately (female: 48.15% (260/540) versus 35.43% (1437/4056), χ 2 = 33.10, P < 0.001; male: 40.15% (897/2234) versus 31.90% (2135/6692), χ 2 = 50.80, P < 0.001).
Univariate binary logistic regression analysis: dependent variable is thyroid nodule.
| Model |
|
| OR | 95% C.I. for OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBP | 1 | 0.013 | 0.000 | 1.014 | 1.011 | 1.016 |
| 2 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 1.005 | 1.002 | 1.007 | |
| 3 | 0.004 | 0.010 | 1.004 | 1.001 | 1.007 | |
|
| ||||||
| DBP | 1 | 0.014 | 0.000 | 1.014 | 1.011 | 1.017 |
| 2 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 1.007 | 1.004 | 1.010 | |
| 3 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 1.006 | 1.002 | 1.010 | |
|
| ||||||
| WC | 1 | 0.020 | 0.000 | 1.020 | 1.016 | 1.024 |
| 2 | 0.018 | 0.000 | 1.018 | 1.014 | 1.023 | |
| 3 | 0.020 | 0.000 | 1.020 | 1.014 | 1.025 | |
|
| ||||||
| FBG | 1 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 1.006 | 1.004 | 1.007 |
| 2 | 0.001 | 0.324 | 1.001 | 0.999 | 1.003 | |
| 3 | 0.001 | 0.609 | 1.001 | 0.998 | 1.003 | |
|
| ||||||
| Insulin | 1 | 0.007 | 0.032 | 1.007 | 1.001 | 1.014 |
| 2 | 0.012 | 0.001 | 1.012 | 1.005 | 1.019 | |
| 3 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 1.011 | 1.003 | 1.018 | |
|
| ||||||
| HOMAIR | 1 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 1.002 | 1.001 | 1.004 |
| 2 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 1.002 | 1.001 | 1.004 | |
| 3 | 0.002 | 0.010 | 1.002 | 1.000 | 1.004 | |
|
| ||||||
| TG | 1 | 0.000 | 0.792 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| 2 | 0.000 | 0.791 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| 3 | 0.000 | 0.836 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
|
| ||||||
| HDL | 1 | −0.002 | 0.130 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 1.001 |
| 2 | −0.004 | 0.012 | 0.996 | 0.993 | 0.999 | |
| 3 | −0.004 | 0.030 | 0.996 | 0.992 | 1.000 | |
Model 1, crude; Model 2, after adjustment for age and sex; Model 3, after further adjustment for TT4 and TSH.
SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; WC: waist circumference; FBG: fasting blood glucose; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index for insulin resistance; TG: triglyceride; HDL: high-density lipoprotein.
The results of follow-up for participants without thyroid diseases in 2009.
| Results in 2012 | Male | Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |
| Normal | 417 | 54.02 | 149 | 51.56 |
| TN | 333 | 43.13 | 123 | 42.56 |
| Cancer | 5 | 0.65 | 2 | 0.69 |
| DG | 6 | 0.78 | 0 | 0.00 |
| HT | 10 | 1.30 | 15 | 5.19 |
| SAT | 1 | 0.13 | 0 | 0.00 |
|
| ||||
| Total | 772 | 289 | ||
All of the results were based on B-mode ultrasound scanning.
TN: thyroid nodule; DG: diffuse goiter; SAT: subacute thyroiditis; HT: Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Univariate binary logistic regression analysis: dependent variable is thyroid nodule in 2012, and independent variables are the status of the metabolic components, Mets, HOMA-IR, and Insulin in 2009. (Method: Enter).
| Independent variable |
|
| RR | 95% C.I. for RR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | 0.288 | 0.031 | 1.333 | 1.027 | 1.731 |
| Hyperglycemia | −0.008 | 0.960 | 0.992 | 0.714 | 1.377 |
| Higher TG | −0.263 | 0.073 | 0.769 | 0.577 | 1.024 |
| Lower HDL | 0.053 | 0.726 | 1.055 | 0.782 | 1.423 |
| Larger WC | 0.352 | 0.007 | 1.422 | 1.100 | 1.839 |
| MetS | 0.136 | 0.405 | 1.145 | 0.832 | 1.576 |
| HOMA-IR | −0.002 | 0.337 | 0.998 | 0.993 | 1.002 |
| Insulin | −0.010 | 0.374 | 0.990 | 0.969 | 1.012 |
All of the metabolic components in 2009 were transferred into qualitative data according to the IDF criteria; MetS was defined according to the IDF criteria as well. All independent variables were adjusted by age and sex. Hypertension lost statistical significance (P = 0.093) in multivariate binary logistic regression analysis when hypertension and WC were taken as independent variables.
TG: triglyceride; HDL: high density lipoprotein; WC: waist circumference; HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index for insulin resistance; MetS: metabolic syndrome.
Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis: dependent variable is thyroid nodule in 2012, and independent variables are age, sex, and the D values of SBP, DBP, WC, FBG, TG, and HDL (method: forward stepwise LR or backward stepwise LR).
|
|
| RR | 95% C.I. for RR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.055 | 0.000 | 1.057 | 1.040 | 1.073 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.035 | 1.001 | 1.000 | 1.002 |
| Constant | −2.759 | 0.000 | 0.063 | ||
D value of TG was calculated as the TG value in 2012 minus the TG value in 2009, and the differences of SBP, DBP, WC, FBG, and HDL were calculated in the same way. The results of forward stepwise LR and backward stepwise LR were absolutely consistent.