Jatinder R Palta1, Jason A Efstathiou2, Justin E Bekelman3, Sasa Mutic4, Carl R Bogardus5, Todd R McNutt6, Peter E Gabriel3, Colleen A Lawton7, Anthony L Zietman2, Christopher M Rose8. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida. Electronic address: paltajr@ufl.edu. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, John Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Valley Radiotherapy Associates Medical Group, Manhattan Beach, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The National Radiation Oncology Registry (NROR) is a collaborative initiative of the Radiation Oncology Institute and the American Society of Radiation Oncology, with input and guidance from other major stakeholders in oncology. The overarching mission of the NROR is to improve the care of cancer patients by capturing reliable information on treatment delivery and health outcomes. METHODS: The NROR will collect patient-specific radiotherapy data electronically to allow for rapid comparison of the many competing treatment modalities and account for effectiveness, outcome, utilization, quality, safety, and cost. It will provide benchmark data and quality improvement tools for individual practitioners. The NROR steering committee has determined that prostate cancer provides an appropriate model to test the concept and the data capturing software in a limited number of sites. The NROR pilot project will begin with this disease-gathering treatment and outcomes data from a limited number of treatment sites across the range of practice; once feasibility is proven, it will scale up to more sites and diseases. RESULTS: When the NROR is fully implemented, all radiotherapy facilities, along with their radiation oncologists, will be solicited to participate in it. With the broader participation of the radiation oncology community, NROR has the potential to serve as a resource for determining national patterns of care, gaps in treatment quality, comparative effectiveness, and hypothesis generation to identify new linkages between therapeutic processes and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The NROR will benefit radiation oncologists and other care providers, payors, vendors, policy-makers, and, most importantly, cancer patients by capturing reliable information on population-based radiation treatment delivery.
PURPOSE: The National Radiation Oncology Registry (NROR) is a collaborative initiative of the Radiation Oncology Institute and the American Society of Radiation Oncology, with input and guidance from other major stakeholders in oncology. The overarching mission of the NROR is to improve the care of cancerpatients by capturing reliable information on treatment delivery and health outcomes. METHODS: The NROR will collect patient-specific radiotherapy data electronically to allow for rapid comparison of the many competing treatment modalities and account for effectiveness, outcome, utilization, quality, safety, and cost. It will provide benchmark data and quality improvement tools for individual practitioners. The NROR steering committee has determined that prostate cancer provides an appropriate model to test the concept and the data capturing software in a limited number of sites. The NROR pilot project will begin with this disease-gathering treatment and outcomes data from a limited number of treatment sites across the range of practice; once feasibility is proven, it will scale up to more sites and diseases. RESULTS: When the NROR is fully implemented, all radiotherapy facilities, along with their radiation oncologists, will be solicited to participate in it. With the broader participation of the radiation oncology community, NROR has the potential to serve as a resource for determining national patterns of care, gaps in treatment quality, comparative effectiveness, and hypothesis generation to identify new linkages between therapeutic processes and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The NROR will benefit radiation oncologists and other care providers, payors, vendors, policy-makers, and, most importantly, cancerpatients by capturing reliable information on population-based radiation treatment delivery.
Authors: Charles Mayo; Steve Conners; Christopher Warren; Robert Miller; Laurence Court; Richard Popple Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Justin E Bekelman; James A Deye; Bhadrasain Vikram; Soren M Bentzen; Deborah Bruner; Walter J Curran; James Dignam; Jason A Efstathiou; T J FitzGerald; Coen Hurkmans; Geoffrey S Ibbott; J Jack Lee; Thomas E Merchant; Jeff Michalski; Jatinder R Palta; Richard Simon; Randal K Ten Haken; Robert Timmerman; Sean Tunis; C Norman Coleman; James Purdy Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Indrin J Chetty; Mary K Martel; David A Jaffray; Stanley H Benedict; Stephen M Hahn; Ross Berbeco; James Deye; Robert Jeraj; Brian Kavanagh; Sunil Krishnan; Nancy Lee; Daniel A Low; David Mankoff; Lawrence B Marks; Daniel Ollendorf; Harald Paganetti; Brian Ross; Ramon Alfredo C Siochi; Robert D Timmerman; John W Wong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-07-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gary V Walker; Sharon H Giordano; Melanie Williams; Jing Jiang; Jiangong Niu; Jill MacKinnon; Patricia Anderson; Brad Wohler; Amber H Sinclair; Francis P Boscoe; Maria J Schymura; Thomas A Buchholz; Benjamin D Smith Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Justin E Bekelman; Aileen Chen; Ronald C Chen; Karen Hoffman; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Benjamin D Smith; James B Yu Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jason A Efstathiou; Deborah S Nassif; Todd R McNutt; C Bob Bogardus; Walter Bosch; Jeffrey Carlin; Ronald C Chen; Henry Chou; Dave Eggert; Benedick A Fraass; Joel Goldwein; Karen E Hoffman; Ken Hotz; Margie Hunt; Marc Kessler; Colleen A F Lawton; Charles Mayo; Jeff M Michalski; Sasa Mutic; Louis Potters; Christopher M Rose; Howard M Sandler; Gregory Sharp; Wolfgang Tomé; Phuoc T Tran; Terry Wall; Anthony L Zietman; Peter E Gabriel; Justin E Bekelman Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Charles S Mayo; Marc L Kessler; Avraham Eisbruch; Grant Weyburne; Mary Feng; James A Hayman; Shruti Jolly; Issam El Naqa; Jean M Moran; Martha M Matuszak; Carlos J Anderson; Lynn P Holevinski; Daniel L McShan; Sue M Merkel; Sherry L Machnak; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-10-13
Authors: Elizabeth Brown; Alison Cray; Annette Haworth; Sarat Chander; Robert Lin; Brindha Subramanian; Michael Ng Journal: J Med Radiat Sci Date: 2015-02-12