Marjorie G Zauderer1, Alex Drilon2, Kyuichi Kadota3, Kety Huberman4, Camelia S Sima5, Isabella Bergagnini2, Dyana K Sumner2, William D Travis3, Adriana Heguy4, Michelle S Ginsberg6, Andrei I Holodny6, Gregory J Riely2, Mark G Kris2, Lee M Krug2, M Catherine Pietanza2. 1. Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States. Electronic address: zauderem@mskcc.org. 2. Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States. 3. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States. 4. Geoffrey Beene Translational Oncology, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States. 6. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) are characterized by aberrantly methylated O(6)-methyl-guanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Epigenetic silencing of MGMT is associated with loss of MGMT activity and improved sensitivity to alkylating agents in glioblastomas. We have reported the activity of temozolomide, a non-classical alkylating agent, in patients with relapsed sensitive or refractory SCLCs, given at 75 mg/m2/day for 21 of 28 days. However, prolonged myelosuppression was noted. We therefore evaluated a 5-day dosing schedule of temozolomide and examined MGMT as a predictive biomarker for temozolomide treatment in SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with sensitive or refractory SCLCs and progression after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens received temozolomide 200 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was tolerability. We also assessed MGMT promoter methylation status by PCR and MGMT expression by immunohistochemistry in tumor specimens. RESULTS: Of 25 patients enrolled, 5 experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity (anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and constipation). The partial response rate was 12% [95% CI: 3-31%], with partial responses in 2 refractory patients. We were able to obtain tumor samples for more than half of patients for MGMT testing. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days in 28-day cycles is tolerable and active in patients with relapsed SCLCs. No treatment-limiting prolonged cytopenias were observed, making this our preferred schedule for further studies. Acquisition of archived biospecimens is feasible and necessary in order to continue evaluating the role of MGMT as a predictive biomarker in SCLCs.
OBJECTIVES:Small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) are characterized by aberrantly methylated O(6)-methyl-guanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Epigenetic silencing of MGMT is associated with loss of MGMT activity and improved sensitivity to alkylating agents in glioblastomas. We have reported the activity of temozolomide, a non-classical alkylating agent, in patients with relapsed sensitive or refractory SCLCs, given at 75 mg/m2/day for 21 of 28 days. However, prolonged myelosuppression was noted. We therefore evaluated a 5-day dosing schedule of temozolomide and examined MGMT as a predictive biomarker for temozolomide treatment in SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with sensitive or refractory SCLCs and progression after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens received temozolomide 200 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was tolerability. We also assessed MGMT promoter methylation status by PCR and MGMT expression by immunohistochemistry in tumor specimens. RESULTS: Of 25 patients enrolled, 5 experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity (anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and constipation). The partial response rate was 12% [95% CI: 3-31%], with partial responses in 2 refractory patients. We were able to obtain tumor samples for more than half of patients for MGMT testing. CONCLUSION:Temozolomide 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days in 28-day cycles is tolerable and active in patients with relapsed SCLCs. No treatment-limiting prolonged cytopenias were observed, making this our preferred schedule for further studies. Acquisition of archived biospecimens is feasible and necessary in order to continue evaluating the role of MGMT as a predictive biomarker in SCLCs.
Authors: S Toyooka; K O Toyooka; R Maruyama; A K Virmani; L Girard; K Miyajima; K Harada; Y Ariyoshi; T Takahashi; K Sugio; E Brambilla; M Gilcrease; J D Minna; A F Gazdar Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J von Pawel; J H Schiller; F A Shepherd; S Z Fields; J P Kleisbauer; N G Chrysson; D J Stewart; P I Clark; M C Palmer; A Depierre; J Carmichael; J B Krebs; G Ross; S R Lane; R Gralla Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L A Hammond; J R Eckardt; S D Baker; S G Eckhardt; M Dugan; K Forral; P Reidenberg; P Statkevich; G R Weiss; D A Rinaldi; D D Von Hoff; E K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mary E R O'Brien; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Hristo Tsekov; Yaroslav Shparyk; Branka Cuceviá; Gabor Juhasz; Nicholas Thatcher; Graham A Ross; Graham C Dane; Theresa Crofts Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria F Paz; Ricard Yaya-Tur; Iñigo Rojas-Marcos; Gaspar Reynes; Marina Pollan; Lucinda Aguirre-Cruz; Jose Luis García-Lopez; Jose Piquer; María-Jose Safont; Carmen Balaña; Montserrat Sanchez-Cespedes; Mercedes García-Villanueva; Leoncio Arribas; Manel Esteller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: John R Eckardt; Joachim von Pawel; Jean-Louis Pujol; Zsolt Papai; Elisabeth Quoix; Andrea Ardizzoni; Ruth Poulin; Alaknanda J Preston; Graham Dane; Graham Ross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A A Brandes; A Tosoni; G Cavallo; R Bertorelle; V Gioia; E Franceschi; M Biscuola; V Blatt; L Crinò; M Ermani Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Christopher B Jackson; Seth I Noorbakhsh; Ranjini K Sundaram; Aravind N Kalathil; Sachita Ganesa; Lanqi Jia; Hank Breslin; Danielle M Burgenske; Oren Gilad; Jann N Sarkaria; Ranjit S Bindra Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Susan F Murphy; Robin T Varghese; Samy Lamouille; Sujuan Guo; Kevin J Pridham; Pratik Kanabur; Alyssa M Osimani; Shaan Sharma; Jane Jourdan; Cara M Rodgers; Gary R Simonds; Robert G Gourdie; Zhi Sheng Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: A-M C Dingemans; M Früh; A Ardizzoni; B Besse; C Faivre-Finn; L E Hendriks; S Lantuejoul; S Peters; N Reguart; C M Rudin; D De Ruysscher; P E Van Schil; J Vansteenkiste; M Reck Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 51.769
Authors: Andrew L Lin; Mark T A Donoghue; Sharon L Wardlaw; T Jonathan Yang; Lisa Bodei; Viviane Tabar; Eliza B Geer Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 5.958