Literature DB >> 12467239

DNA methylation profiles of lung tumors.

S Toyooka1, K O Toyooka, R Maruyama, A K Virmani, L Girard, K Miyajima, K Harada, Y Ariyoshi, T Takahashi, K Sugio, E Brambilla, M Gilcrease, J D Minna, A F Gazdar.   

Abstract

Aberrant methylation of CpG islands in promoter regions of tumor cells is one of the major mechanisms for silencing of tumor suppressor genes. We determined the frequency of aberrant promoter methylation of the p16, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), H-cadherin (CDH13), glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1), O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT), retinoic acid receptor beta-2 (RAR beta), E-cadherin (CDH1), and RAS association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) genes in 198 tumors consisting of small cell lung cancers [SCLCs (n = 43)], non-small cell lung cancers [NSCLCs (n = 115)], and bronchial carcinoids (n = 40). The profile of methylated genes in the two neuroendocrine tumors (SCLC and carcinoids) were very different from that of NSCLC. However, whereas the overall pattern of aberrant methylation of carcinoids was similar to that of SCLC, carcinoids had lower frequencies of methylation for some of the genes tested. There were also significant differences in the methylation profiles between the two major types of NSCLC, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. We performed cluster analysis and found that SCLCs clustered with other SCLCs and carcinoids but not with NSCLCs, whereas the NSCLCs tended to cluster together. Within NSCLCs, adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas clustered with their respective histological types. Finally, we compared the methylation profiles of SCLC and NSCLC tumors and their respective cell lines (n = 44). In general, methylation frequencies were higher in tumor cell lines, but these differences were seldom significant. Thus, tumor cell lines appear to be suitable models to study aberrant DNA methylation. We conclude that SCLC, carcinoids, squamous cell carcinomas, and adenocarcinomas of the lung have unique profiles of aberrant methylation. Our findings should help us understand differences in the pathogenetic mechanisms of lung cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12467239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  53 in total

1.  Aberrant promoter methylation of CDH13 and MGMT genes is associated with clinicopathologic characteristics of primary non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Milica Kontic; Jelena Stojsic; Dragana Jovanovic; Vera Bunjevacki; Simona Ognjanovic; Jacquelyn Kuriger; Susan Puumala; Heather H Nelson
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Aberrant DNA methylation profile in pleural fluid for differential diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Masanori Fujii; Nobukazu Fujimoto; Akio Hiraki; Kenichi Gemba; Keisuke Aoe; Shigeki Umemura; Hideki Katayama; Nagio Takigawa; Katsuyuki Kiura; Mitsune Tanimoto; Takumi Kishimoto
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 6.716

3.  RASSF1A promoter methylation and Kras2 mutations in non small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jie Li; Zhongqiu Zhang; Zunyan Dai; Anthony P Popkie; Christoph Plass; Carl Morrison; Yian Wang; Ming You
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  Epigenetic aberrant methylation of tumor suppressor genes in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Zhou Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  A subset of high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas shows up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-7 associated with nuclear beta-catenin immunoreactivity, independent of EGFR and HER-2 gene amplification or expression.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pelosi; Aldo Scarpa; Giulia Veronesi; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Barbara Del Curto; Patrick S Moore; Patrick Maisonneuve; Angelica Sonzogni; Michele Masullo; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Epigenetic and copy number variation analysis in retinoblastoma by MS-MLPA.

Authors:  Gabriella Livide; Maria Carmela Epistolato; Mariangela Amenduni; Vittoria Disciglio; Annabella Marozza; Maria Antonietta Mencarelli; Paolo Toti; Stefano Lazzi; Theodora Hadjistilianou; Sonia De Francesco; Alfonso D'Ambrosio; Alessandra Renieri; Francesca Ariani
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 7.  Molecular screening of cancer: the future is here.

Authors:  Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Establishment and validation of real-time polymerase chain reaction method for CDH1 promoter methylation.

Authors:  Kiyomi O Toyooka; Shinichi Toyooka; Anirban Maitra; Qinghua Feng; Nancy C Kiviat; Alice Smith; John D Minna; Raheela Ashfaq; Adi F Gazdar
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Histone deacetylation, as opposed to promoter methylation, results in epigenetic BIM silencing and resistance to EGFR TKI in NSCLC.

Authors:  Mingchuan Zhao; Yishi Zhang; Jiayu Li; Xuefei Li; Ningning Cheng; Qi Wang; Weijing Cai; Chao Zhao; Yayi He; Jianhua Chang; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Diagnostic utility of MS-MLPA in DNA methylation profiling of adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the colon-rectum.

Authors:  Daniela Furlan; Nora Sahnane; Mara Mazzoni; Roberta Pastorino; Ileana Carnevali; Michele Stefanoli; Andrea Ferretti; Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Stefano La Rosa; Carlo Capella
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.