Literature DB >> 25194517

Surgical training using three-dimensional simulation in placement of cervical lateral mass screws: a blinded randomized control trial.

Michael B Gottschalk1, S Tim Yoon2, Daniel K Park3, John M Rhee1, Phillip M Mitchell4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The skills and knowledge that residents have to master has increased, yet the amount of hours that the residents are allowed to work has been reduced. There is a strong need to improve training techniques to compensate for these changes. One approach is to use simulation-training methods to shorten the learning curve for surgeons in training.
PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of surgical training using three-dimensional (3D) simulation on the placement of lateral mass screws in the cervical spine on either cadavers or sawbones. STUDY
DESIGN: A blinded randomized control study.
METHODS: Fifteen orthopedic residents, postgraduate year (PGY) 1 to 6, were asked to simulate Magerl lateral mass screw trajectories from C3-C7 on cadavers using a navigated drill guide, but with no feedback as to the actual trajectory within the bone (Baseline 1). This was repeated to determine baseline accuracy (Baseline 2). They were then randomized into three groups: Group 1, control, did not receive any training, whereas Groups 2 and 3 received 3D navigational feedback as to the intended drill trajectory on sawbones and cadavers, respectively. All three groups then performed final simulated drilling (final test). All 3D images were deidentified and reviewed by a blinded single fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeon. Each image/screw was measured for the starting site, caudad/cephalad angle, and medial/lateral angle to determine trajectory accuracy.
RESULTS: The aggregate mean difference from a perfect screw was compiled for each session for each group. A negative difference shows improvement, whereas a positive difference shows regression. The difference between final test and Baseline 1 in the control group was 2.4°, suggesting regression. In contrast, the differences for groups sawbone and cadaver were -8.2° and -7.2°, respectively, suggesting improvement. When comparing the difference in aggregate sum angle for the sawbones and cadaver groups with the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Training with 3D navigation significantly improved the ability of orthopedic residents to properly drill simulated lateral mass screws. As such, training with 3D navigation may be a useful adjunct in resident surgical education. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; Cervical lateral mass; Education; Navigation; Resident; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25194517     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  18 in total

1.  Accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-navigated anterior transpedicular screw insertion in the cervical spine: an experimental study.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Carolin Meyer; Max Joseph Scheyerer; Florian Siedek; Lars Peter Müller; Peer Eysel; Gregor Stein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The perceived efficacy and utility of spine bioskills curricula for resident and fellow education.

Authors:  Michael H McCarthy; Barrett S Boody; Peter R Swiatek; Brett D Rosenthal; Jason Savage; Wellington K Hsu; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-09

Review 3.  The utility of virtual reality and augmented reality in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  Minimally invasive surgery for resection of ossification of the ligamentum flavum in the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Chaoxiong Shen; Ranze Cai; Jianfeng Wu; Yuandong Zhuang; Zhaowen Cai; Rui Wang; Chunmei Chen
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  The Effectiveness of Bioskills Training for Simulated Open Lumbar Laminectomy.

Authors:  Barrett S Boody; Brett D Rosenthal; Tyler J Jenkins; Alpesh A Patel; Jason W Savage; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-06-23

6.  When to Introduce Three-Dimensional Visualization Technology into Surgical Residency: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chen Lin; Junyi Gao; Hua Zheng; Jun Zhao; Hua Yang; Yue Zheng; Yihan Cao; Yufei Chen; Guoliang Wu; Guole Lin; Jianchun Yu; Hanzhong Li; Hui Pan; Quan Liao; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Evolving Navigation, Robotics, and Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Murat Cosar; Sertac Kirnaz; Franziska A Schmidt; Christoph Wipplinger; Taylor Wong; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

8.  Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jeffrey C Wang; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Danny P Goel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hannah K James; Anna W Chapman; Giles T R Pattison; Joanne D Fisher; Damian R Griffin
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2020-06

10.  The Effectiveness of Bioskills Training for Simulated Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement.

Authors:  Barrett S Boody; Sohaib Z Hashmi; Brett D Rosenthal; Joseph P Maslak; Michael H McCarthy; Alpesh A Patel; Jason W Savage; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.