Michael R Zile1, William H Gaasch2, Kanan Patel3, Inmaculada B Aban3, Ali Ahmed4. 1. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina. Electronic address: zilem@musc.edu. 2. Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts. 3. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 4. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether specific patterns of adverse left ventricular (LV) structural remodeling are associated with differential rates of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. BACKGROUND: It is not known whether a stepwise combinatorial assessment of LV volume, mass, and geometry done to define specific remodeling patterns provides incremental prognostic information. METHODS: A total of 3,181 Cardiovascular Health Study participants (mean age, 73 years of age; 60% women, 5% African American) were categorized by LV remodeling patterns and related to a multivariate-adjusted (age, sex, race, ejection fraction, hypertension, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease) analysis of CV outcomes (incident heart failure [HF], all-cause mortality, and a combined endpoint of HF and mortality) over a 13-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Examined independently, either left ventricular enlargement (LVE) or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was associated with a higher risk of HF (32%, 34%, respectively) than with normal geometry (17%; p < 0.001). When LV volume and mass were used in combination, important incremental prognostic information was achieved. In the absence of LVE, HF was more common in those with LVH than in those with normal mass (32% vs. 16%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the presence of LVE, HF was more common in those with LVH than in those with normal mass (37% vs. 29%, respectively; p = 0.021). The subgroup with normal volume and mass but relative wall thickness (RWT) >0.42 carried a higher risk of HF (21%) than those with normal geometry (15%; p = 0.011). Once LVH or LVE was present, the addition of RWT to this analysis did not affect HF rate. Similar results were obtained for the other CV outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise combinatorial assessment of LV volume, mass, and geometry provides incremental prognostic information regarding CV outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether specific patterns of adverse left ventricular (LV) structural remodeling are associated with differential rates of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. BACKGROUND: It is not known whether a stepwise combinatorial assessment of LV volume, mass, and geometry done to define specific remodeling patterns provides incremental prognostic information. METHODS: A total of 3,181 Cardiovascular Health Study participants (mean age, 73 years of age; 60% women, 5% African American) were categorized by LV remodeling patterns and related to a multivariate-adjusted (age, sex, race, ejection fraction, hypertension, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease) analysis of CV outcomes (incident heart failure [HF], all-cause mortality, and a combined endpoint of HF and mortality) over a 13-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Examined independently, either left ventricular enlargement (LVE) or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was associated with a higher risk of HF (32%, 34%, respectively) than with normal geometry (17%; p < 0.001). When LV volume and mass were used in combination, important incremental prognostic information was achieved. In the absence of LVE, HF was more common in those with LVH than in those with normal mass (32% vs. 16%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the presence of LVE, HF was more common in those with LVH than in those with normal mass (37% vs. 29%, respectively; p = 0.021). The subgroup with normal volume and mass but relative wall thickness (RWT) >0.42 carried a higher risk of HF (21%) than those with normal geometry (15%; p = 0.011). Once LVH or LVE was present, the addition of RWT to this analysis did not affect HF rate. Similar results were obtained for the other CV outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise combinatorial assessment of LV volume, mass, and geometry provides incremental prognostic information regarding CV outcomes.
Authors: Gabriela Querejeta Roca; Susan Redline; Brian Claggett; Natalie Bello; Christie M Ballantyne; Scott D Solomon; Amil M Shah Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Leila R Zelnick; Ronit Katz; Bessie A Young; Adolfo Correa; Bryan R Kestenbaum; Ian H de Boer; Nisha Bansal Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2017-01-28 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Ambarish Pandey; Neil Keshvani; Colby Ayers; Adolfo Correa; Mark H Drazner; Alana Lewis; Carlos J Rodriguez; Michael E Hall; Ervin R Fox; Robert J Mentz; Christopher deFilippi; Stephen L Seliger; Christie M Ballantyne; Ian J Neeland; James A de Lemos; Jarett D Berry Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Tiago Fernandes; Valério G Baraúna; Carlos E Negrão; M Ian Phillips; Edilamar M Oliveira Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Sonia Garg; James A de Lemos; Colby Ayers; Michel G Khouri; Ambarish Pandey; Jarett D Berry; Ronald M Peshock; Mark H Drazner Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-19
Authors: Michael R Zile; Vinod Sharma; James W Johnson; Eduardo N Warman; Catalin F Baicu; Tom D Bennett Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Fernando U Kay; Suhny Abbara; Parag H Joshi; Sonia Garg; Amit Khera; Ronald M Peshock Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Wilson Nadruz; Brian Claggett; Alexandra Gonçalves; Gabriela Querejeta-Roca; Miguel M Fernandes-Silva; Amil M Shah; Susan Cheng; Hirofumi Tanaka; Gerardo Heiss; Dalane W Kitzman; Scott D Solomon Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Peiheng Gan; Catalin Baicu; Hirofumi Watanabe; Kristy Wang; Ge Tao; Daniel P Judge; Michael R Zile; Takako Makita; Rupak Mukherjee; Henry M Sucov Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 6.150