Corey S Davis1, Jill Johnston2, Lisa de Saxe Zerden3, Katie Clark4, Tessie Castillo5, Robert Childs6. 1. Network for Public Health Law - Southeastern Region, 101 E. Weaver St. #G-7, Carrboro, NC 27510, United States. Electronic address: cdavis@networkforphl.org. 2. UNC Chapel Hill School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States. Electronic address: jillj@unc.edu. 3. UNC Chapel Hill School of Social Work, 325 Pittsboro St. CB#3550, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3550, United States. Electronic address: lzerden@unc.edu. 4. North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, 1005 Slater Road Suite 330, Durham, NC 27703, United States. Electronic address: Katie.clark@yale.edu. 5. North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, 1005 Slater Road Suite 330, Durham, NC 27703, United States. Electronic address: Tessie@nchrc.net. 6. North Carolina Harm Reduction Coalition, 1005 Slater Road Suite 330, Durham, NC 27703, United States. Electronic address: Robert@nchrc.net.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: North Carolina, like much of the U.S. South, is disproportionately affected by HIV and hepatitis. This persistently high disease burden may be driven in part by laws that criminalize the possession and distribution of syringes for illicit drug use. Legal change to decriminalize syringes may reduce infection rates in the state, but is unlikely absent support from law enforcement actors. METHODS: We analyzed the responses of 350 North Carolina law enforcement officers to a confidential, anonymous survey. The survey instrument collected data regarding self-reported needle-stick injury (NSI), blood borne disease risk perception and attitudes toward syringe decriminalization. RESULTS: 82% of respondents reported that contracting HIV was a "big concern" for them. 3.8% of respondents reported ever receiving a job-related NSI, a rate of 36 NSI per 10,000 officer-years. Majorities of respondents reported positive views regarding syringe decriminalization, with approximately 63% agreeing that it would be "good for the community" and 60% agreeing that it would be "good for law enforcement." Black and female officers were significantly less likely to agree that on-the-job NSI was a "big concern" and significantly more likely to agree that it would be good for law enforcement. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that many North Carolina LEOs understand the public health benefits of syringe access programs and may be inclined to support syringe decriminalization legislation. Further research is indicated to determine the causes of observed differences in perceptions of bloodborne disease risk and attitudes toward syringe decriminalization by race and sex.
BACKGROUND: North Carolina, like much of the U.S. South, is disproportionately affected by HIV and hepatitis. This persistently high disease burden may be driven in part by laws that criminalize the possession and distribution of syringes for illicit drug use. Legal change to decriminalize syringes may reduce infection rates in the state, but is unlikely absent support from law enforcement actors. METHODS: We analyzed the responses of 350 North Carolina law enforcement officers to a confidential, anonymous survey. The survey instrument collected data regarding self-reported needle-stick injury (NSI), blood borne disease risk perception and attitudes toward syringe decriminalization. RESULTS: 82% of respondents reported that contracting HIV was a "big concern" for them. 3.8% of respondents reported ever receiving a job-related NSI, a rate of 36 NSI per 10,000 officer-years. Majorities of respondents reported positive views regarding syringe decriminalization, with approximately 63% agreeing that it would be "good for the community" and 60% agreeing that it would be "good for law enforcement." Black and female officers were significantly less likely to agree that on-the-job NSI was a "big concern" and significantly more likely to agree that it would be good for law enforcement. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that many North Carolina LEOs understand the public health benefits of syringe access programs and may be inclined to support syringe decriminalization legislation. Further research is indicated to determine the causes of observed differences in perceptions of bloodborne disease risk and attitudes toward syringe decriminalization by race and sex.
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Erin P Ricketts; Steven Huettner; Lee Cornelius; David Bishai; Jennifer R Havens; Peter Beilenson; Charles Rapp; Jacqueline J Lloyd; Carl A Latkin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Traci C Green; Nickolas Zaller; Wilson R Palacios; Sarah E Bowman; Madeline Ray; Robert Heimer; Patricia Case Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Caleb J Banta-Green; Leo Beletsky; Jennifer A Schoeppe; Phillip O Coffin; Patricia C Kuszler Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Javier A Cepeda; Leo Beletsky; Anne Sawyer; Chris Serio-Chapman; Marina Smelyanskaya; Jennifer Han; Natanya Robinowitz; Susan G Sherman Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Leo Beletsky; Daniela Abramovitz; Jaime Arredondo; Pieter Baker; Irina Artamonova; Phil Marotta; Maria Luisa Mittal; Teresita Rocha-Jimenez; Javier A Cepeda; Mario Morales; Erika Clairgue; Thomas A Patterson; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Mario Morales; Claudia Rafful; Tommi L Gaines; Javier A Cepeda; Daniela Abramovitz; Irina Artamonova; Pieter Baker; Erika Clairgue; Maria Luisa Mittal; Teresita Rocha-Jimenez; Jaime Arredondo; Thomas Kerr; Arnulfo Bañuelos; Steffanie A Strathdee; Leo Beletsky Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2018-09-15
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Jaime Arredondo; Teresita Rocha; Daniela Abramovitz; Maria Luisa Rolon; Efrain Patiño Mandujano; Maria Gudelia Rangel; Horcasitas Omar Olivarria; Tommi Gaines; Thomas L Patterson; Leo Beletsky Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 2.692