Francesco Benazzo1, Giacomo Zanon1, Catherine Klersy2, Matteo Marullo3. 1. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. 2. Servizio di Biometria e Statistica, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy. 3. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. matteomarullo@hotmail.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study aimed to compare two methods of open surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy in sportsmen. A novel technique consisting in transferring some soleus fibres into the degenerated tendon to improve its vascularization and longitudinal tenotomies are evaluated and compared. METHODS: From 2006 to 2011, fifty-two competitive and noncompetitive athletes affected by midportion Achilles tendinopathy were surgically treated and prospectively evaluated at 6 months and at a final 4-year mean follow-up. Twenty patients had longitudinal tenotomies, and thirty-two had soleus fibres transfer. Clinical outcome was evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score. Time to return to walk and to run and tendon thickening were also recorded. RESULTS: Patients in the soleus transfer group had a higher increase in AOFAS and VISA-A score at 6 months and at the mean 4-year final follow-up (by 5.4 points, 95 % CI 2.9-7.9, p < 0.001 and by 5.7 points, 95 % CI 2.5-8.9, p = 0.001, for AOFAS and VISA, respectively). They also needed less time to return to run: 98.9 ± 17.4 days compared to 122.2 ± 26.3 days for the longitudinal tenotomies group (p = 0.0019). The soleus transfer group had a greater prevalence of tendon thickening (59.4 % compared to 30.0 % in the longitudinal tenotomies group, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Open surgery for midportion Achilles tendinopathy is safe and effective in medium term. Despite similar outcomes in postoperative functional scores, soleus transfer allows a faster recovery but has a higher incidence of tendon thickening. These results should suggest the use of the soleus graft technique in high-level athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, Level II.
PURPOSE: The study aimed to compare two methods of open surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy in sportsmen. A novel technique consisting in transferring some soleus fibres into the degenerated tendon to improve its vascularization and longitudinal tenotomies are evaluated and compared. METHODS: From 2006 to 2011, fifty-two competitive and noncompetitive athletes affected by midportion Achilles tendinopathy were surgically treated and prospectively evaluated at 6 months and at a final 4-year mean follow-up. Twenty patients had longitudinal tenotomies, and thirty-two had soleus fibres transfer. Clinical outcome was evaluated by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score. Time to return to walk and to run and tendon thickening were also recorded. RESULTS:Patients in the soleus transfer group had a higher increase in AOFAS and VISA-A score at 6 months and at the mean 4-year final follow-up (by 5.4 points, 95 % CI 2.9-7.9, p < 0.001 and by 5.7 points, 95 % CI 2.5-8.9, p = 0.001, for AOFAS and VISA, respectively). They also needed less time to return to run: 98.9 ± 17.4 days compared to 122.2 ± 26.3 days for the longitudinal tenotomies group (p = 0.0019). The soleus transfer group had a greater prevalence of tendon thickening (59.4 % compared to 30.0 % in the longitudinal tenotomies group, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Open surgery for midportion Achilles tendinopathy is safe and effective in medium term. Despite similar outcomes in postoperative functional scores, soleus transfer allows a faster recovery but has a higher incidence of tendon thickening. These results should suggest the use of the soleus graft technique in high-level athletes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative study, Level II.
Authors: Y Bohu; N Lefèvre; T Bauer; O Laffenetre; S Herman; M Thaunat; T Cucurulo; J-P Franceschi; C Cermolacce; E Rolland Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 2.256
Authors: A Burssens; R Forsyth; W Bongaerts; M Jagodzinski; N Mahieu; M Praet; J Victor Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2012-09-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: J M Robinson; J L Cook; C Purdam; P J Visentini; J Ross; N Maffulli; J E Taunton; K M Khan Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Benjamin John Floyd Dean; Sarah J B Snelling; Stephanie G Dakin; Richard J Murphy; Muhammad Kassim Javaid; Andrew Jonathan Carr Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 5.156